Structural Modeling of the Relationship between Personality Dimensions with a Tendency toward Marital Infidelity: the Mediating Effect of Religious Beliefs
Journal of Pizhūhish dar dīn va Salāmat (i.e., Research on Religion & Health),
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023),
27 May 2025
,
Page 93-106
https://doi.org/10.22037/jrrh.v9i1.37468
Abstract
Background and Objective: Marital infidelity is defined as a sexual, romantic, or emotional relationship, which causes a person's infidelity towards its marital relationship and is known as one of the destructive events in intimate relationships and often leads to turmoil, dispute, dissolution, and divorce. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between personality dimensions and marital infidelity based on the mediating role of religious beliefs.
Methods: The sample population was all married couples in Tehran in 2021, of whom 350 were selected by accessible sampling method. For data collection, McCree and Costa’s NEO-Personality Inventory-Revised, Bashirpour et al.’s Marital Infidelity Tendency Questionnaire, and Golriz’s Religious Attitude Questionnaire were used. In order to test the research model, the path analysis method was used by the maximum probability. In this study, all ethical considerations were observed and the authors reported no conflict of interests.
Results: Based on the results, neuroticism had negative and extroversion, openness, agreeableness, and consciousness had positive effects on religious beliefs. Also, religious beliefs had a negative effect on marital infidelity. The neuroticism both directly and indirectly, affected the tendency toward marital infidelity with the mediating role of religious beliefs. According to the results, 47.5% of the variance in religious beliefs and 76.5% of the variance in marital infidelity were explained by the variables of the model.
Conclusion: It can be stated that religion and religious beliefs can have a negative impact on marital infidelity. The key to living without conflict is to pay attention to spiritual issues and to cultivate religious beliefs. Values give meaning to life and act as a refuge when faced with life crises such as sadness, loss, and mourning. Religion provides couples with instructions on how to deal with and resolve conflicts when they arise.
- Personality Dimensions Marital Infidelity; Religious Beliefs
How to Cite
References
Ferron A, Lussier Y, Sabourin S, Brassard A. The role of internet pornography use and cyber infidelity in the associations between personality, attachment, and couple and sexual satisfaction. Social Networking. 2016;6(1):1-18.
Aman J, Abbas J, Lela U, Shi G. Religious affiliation, daily spirituals, and private religious factors promote marital commitment among married couples: does religiosity help people amid the COVID-19 crisis? Frontiers in psychology. 2021;12.
Aman J, Abbas J, Nurunnabi M, Bano S. The relationship of religiosity and marital satisfaction: The role of religious commitment and practices on marital satisfaction among Pakistani respondents. Behavioral Sciences. 2019;9(3):30-42.
Ghoreishi Rad FS, Pourjabar Akhooni F. Relationship between religious commitment and other factors related to tendency toward extra-marital affairs among married students. Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics. 2018;5(2):45-50. (Full Text in Persian)
Tuttle JD, Davis SN. Religion, infidelity, and divorce: Reexamining the effect of religious behavior on divorce among long-married couples. Journal of divorce & remarriage. 2015;56(6):475-89.
Khosravi A, Heydarnia A, Nazifi M. The role of Religious Attitude in Attitude towards Infidelity: The Mediating Role of Subjective Well-being. Positive Psychology Research. 2019;5(3):13-28. (Full Text in Persian)
Yoosefi N, Karimipour B, Amani A. The study model of religious beliefs, conflict resolution styles, and marital commitment with attitudes toward marital infidelity. Journal of Applied Counseling. 2016;6(1):47-64. (Full Text in Persian)
Rezaei Gazki P, Delavar A, Samavi A. Does Academic Commitment Affect the Learners' Progress through Academic Buoyancy? A Structural Equation Model. Iranian Evolutionary and Educational Psychology Journal. 2019;1(3):196-203. (Full Text in Persian)
Wiggins JS. The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives: Guilford Press; 1996.
Tahmasb AM, Ghorbani N, Watson P. Relationships between self-and peer-reported integrative self-knowledge and the big five factors in Iran. Current Psychology. 2008;27(3):169-76.
Bashirpour M, ShafiAbadi A, Dokaneii F. Psychometric properties of the scale of marital infidelity. PSYCHOMETRY. 2018;6(24):37-55. (Full Text in Persian)
Golriz G. Study of the relationship between attitude
Atapour N, Falsafinejad MR, Ahmadi K, Khodabakhshi-Koolaee A. A Study of the Processes and Contextual Factors of Marital Infidelity. Practice in Clinical Psychology. 2021;9(3):211-26 .(Full Text in Persian)
Wilkinson DE, Dunlop WL. Both sides of the story: Narratives of romantic infidelity. Personal Relationships. 2021;28(1):121-47.
Whisman MA, Snyder DK. Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment. Journal of family psychology; 2007:21(2):147.
Labrecque LT, Whisman MA. Attitudes toward and prevalence of extramarital sex and descriptions of extramarital partners in the 21st century. Journal of Family Psychology. 2017;31(7):952.
Castro Á, Barrada JR. Dating apps and their sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(18):6500.
Fincham FD, May RW. Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current opinion in psychology. 2017;13:70-4.
Kumar A, Sharma L, Narwal S, Kamal N. Infidelity, Betrayal and Homicide—A Case Report. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. 2017;39(4):430-3.
Lee BH, O’Sullivan LF. Walk the line: How successful are efforts to maintain monogamy in intimate relationships? Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2019;48(6):1735-48.
Van Z, CJ J. The five factor model and infidelity: Beyond the broad domains. Personality and individual differences. 2021;172:110553.
Mahambrey M. Selfreported Big Five personality traits of individuals who have experienced partner infidelity. Personal Relationships. 2020;27(2):274-302.
Batara JBL, Guanzon AB, Macaloyos JL, Diaz CL, Albao JC, Villano MD. Parental infidelity and children’s reactions: A case study in a Filipino family. Prism. 2018;23(1).
Miller SL, Maner JK. Sex differences in response to sexual versus emotional infidelity: The moderating role of individual differences. Personality and individual differences. 2009;46(3):287-91.
Scheeren P, Apellániz IdAMd, Wagner A. Marital infidelity: The experience of men and women. Trends in Psychology. 2018;26:355-69.
Martins A, Pereira M, Andrade R, Dattilio FM, Narciso I, Canavarro MC. Infidelity in dating relationships: Gender-specific correlates of face-to-face
with other feedback and job characterizations. Tehran University: Faculty of literature and human sciences; 1974.
Bakhshayesh F, Bagheri N. Comparison of personality characteristics and sexual satisfaction among couples with marital infidelity and normal couples. Salamat Ijtimai (Community Health). 2020;7(3):299-309. (Full Text in Persian)
Ghasemi F, Askarizadeh G, Mosavi-nasab SMH. Relationship of personality traits, religious attitude and sexual satisfaction with tendency towards divorcee in paramedic females. Journal of Pizhūhish dar dīn va salāmat. 2020;5(4):20-33. (Full Text in Persian)
Khayat E, Attari Y, Koraei A. Predict the tendency toward infidelity based on personality traits and attachment styles in married people. Quarterly Social Psychology Research. 2018;8(31):87-102. (Full Text in Persian)
Radmehr H, Shams J. Examining the association between religious commitment and marital stability among divorce-seeking and normal couples in Tehran. Pizhūhish dar dīn va salāmat. 2019;4(5):77-86. (Full Text in Persian)
- Abstract Viewed: 587 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 87 times