The Criterion for Determining Treatment Priority in the Patients
Journal of Pizhūhish dar dīn va Salāmat (i.e., Research on Religion & Health),
Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022),
20 June 2022
,
Page 1-8
https://doi.org/10.22037/jrrh.v8i2.38265
Abstract
It happens quite often that a physician or health specialist faces force majeure conditions in which s/he does not know what to do; for instance, when s/he has two or more patients exposed to risk and s/he does not have the ability to treat both considering the facilities s/he has and the particular conditions s/he is faced with, or when a patient is exposed to two risks and the physician needs to deal with and avoid both risks. The question is “how can s/he handle both? At the same time, there is benefit in both force majeure conditions and both need expediency, but we are not aware of it. However, there must be a criterion for determining the priority for treatment of one patient over the other or a treatment priority for avoiding the serious risk over the non-serious one. We will discuss this issue in several phases to find an operational solution for determining the criterion for treatment priority.
- Treatment priority; Patient; Physician
How to Cite
References
Mozafar MR. Osool al-Fegh. 5 ed. Qom: Boostan-e Ketab; 2008.
Abdoljabari M, Karamkhani M, Fani M, Dolatshahi F. Euthanasia and Assisted Death Journal of Reaserch on Religion & Health. 2016;1(1):56-64.
Naeini MH. Favaed al-Osool. 1 ed. Qom: Jameh al-Modaresin Hovzeh Elmiyeh-e Qom; 1997.
Khoei Aa-Q. Mesbah al-Osool 5ed. Qom: Maktab al-Davari; 1997.
Akhond-e Khorasani MK. Kefayat al-Osool. 6 ed. Qom: Moassesh al-Nashr al-Eslami; 2009.
- Abstract Viewed: 549 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 161 times