The review of the journal of Pizhūhish dar dīn va salāmat is online. Online Review System has been developed for speeding up the review process by the reviewers. The overall procedures for the review process are as follows:
- Registering the reviewer’s name as user in the program
- Providing access as reviewer and specifying the reviewer’s areas of expertise
- Assigning articles to reviewers and sending a respective electronic message
- Checking the website and entering via username and password
- Going to the review section and receiving the articles
Registering the reviewer’s name as user in the program
To be able to enter the program as a reviewer, you should first register on the website as reviewer and then complete the membership form. You can access this form using the following link:
https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/jrrh/login
Providing access as reviewer and specifying the reviewer’s areas of expertise
Note: This is normally done by the administrator of the website. After you have registered your name as user, the administrator can provide specific access for review using the electronic review section by introducing the reviewers to the program.
Assigning articles to reviewers and sending a respective electronic message
Note: This is normally done by the website administrator.
After the review settings and introducing the reviewers, the program director can provide the articles submitted for review to the respective specialized reviewer. At the same time, an email is sent to the reviewers informing them in this regard.
Checking the website and entering via username and password
In this stage, the reviewer has been selected as a potential reviewer of the submitted article. By entering his/her username and password, the reviewer can enter his/her personal profile and see a list of the articles sent to him/her. The list of articles includes:
1) A list of the new articles
The new articles include those recently added to the list of articles assigned to the reviewer. You can decline reviewing these articles or fill in the review form.
2) Incomplete reviews
Incomplete reviews include a list of the articles with incomplete review process. You can reexamine these articles or modify your comments in necessary.
3) Confirmed reviews
Because you have confirmed your comments on these articles, the program directors have taken your comments into account in selecting the articles. Therefore, confirmed articles have only been listed on this page for checking the review results (and not their modification).
Doing the review
1) Request page: First, the reviewer enters the request page and sees the following titles: Review request, article title, abstract, type of review, review timing, I have conflict of interests, this article includes conflict of interests, saving, etc. By filling in the required fields and saving information, you can enter the second stage, i.e., guidelines.
2) Guidelines page: before accepting to review the article and reading the guidelines, you immediately enter the next stage, i.e., Guidelines.
3) Download and review: In this stage, the review files are downloadable and the respected reviewer can see the files by clicking on any of them and register the review results in the provided form. The reviewer can also upload the files related to reviewing the articles in the Upload section if necessary.
In the section ‘Reviewing the conversations’, there is a tab called ‘adding conversation’ in which the reviewer can talk to the journal staff.
At the end, there is a tab called ‘Recommendation’ in which the reviewer presents his/her final decision by choosing one of the following: 1) Accept submitted article, 2) Revision, 3), Send for re-review, 4) Send to another journal, 5) rejection of the submitted article, and 6) See my comments.
Finally, by selecting ‘Register review’, the respected reviewer’s decision will be registered.
4) Completion: In this section, the message ‘Review registered’ can be seen.
