مجله اخلاق پزشکی - علمی پژوهشی

Lotfi E. From Informed Consent to knowingly choosing: A study on the commitment to information delivery in physician-patient relationship. Med Law J 2009; 3(11): 39-73.

Katz J. The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. 1st ed. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2002.

Sargos P. Two "historic" judgments in terms of general medical liability and specific liability linked to a doctor's failure of his duty to inform. Rec Dalloz 2010; 24(7429): 1522-1526.

Parsapoor MB, Ghasemzadeh SR. Legal and jurisprudential study of patient`s informed consent and physician`s duty of notification: A comparison between Iranian, English and French law. IJME 2011; 5(1): 39-50.

Cooke J. Law of Tort. 9th ed. England: Harlow, Pearson Longman; 2009.

Joodaki B, Khaleghi A. Patient’s consent, legal conditions and their criminal protection. IJME 2012; 5(6): 14-26.

Edozien LC. Self-determination in Health Care: A Property Approach to the Protection of Patients' Rights. 1st ed. England: Routledge; 2016.

Hostiuc S, Buda O. The Age of Informed Consent: A European History. 1st ed. England: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2019.

Ciortea AE. What Medical Risks Should Physicians Disclose to their Patients? Towards a Better Standard in American and French Medical Malpractice Law. J Civ L Stud 2017; 10: 173-221.

Vansweevelt T, Glover-Thomas N. Informed Consent and Health: A Global Analysis. 1st ed. England: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2020.

Mohr v. Williams. Minnesota: Supreme Court; 1905.

Tawose OM. The legal boundaries of informed consent. AMA Journal of Ethics 2008; 10(8): 521-523.

Raab EL. The parameters of informed consent. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 2004; 102: 225-226.

Pratt v. Davis. Illinois: Supreme Court; 1906.

Rolater v. Strain. Oklahoma: Supreme Court; 1913.

Wandler M. The history of the informed consent requirement in United States federal policy. Massachusetts: Harvard University’s DASH; 2001 Report No.: ID# 705059320.

Shandell RE, Schulman FA, Smith P. The preparation and trial of medical malpractice cases. 1st ed. New York: Law Journal Press; 2018.

Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital. New York: Court of Appeals; 1914.

Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees. California: District Court of Appeal; 1957.

Natanson v. Kline. Kansas: Supreme Court; 1960.

Grzegorz Mazur OP. Informed consent, proxy consent, and Catholic bioethics: For the good of the subject. 1st ed. Netherlands: Springer; 2012.

Shah P, Thornton I, Turrin D, Hipskind JE. Informed Consent, Florida: Stat Pearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL). 2020.

Thouvenin D. Scope of a reversal of case-law concerning the physician's duty to inform. Rec Dalloz 2001; 43(1): 3470-3477.

Khoshnoodi R. Changes in Principles of medical liability in French law. Sci J Forensic Med 2014; 20(4): 417-425.

Décision n° 94-343/344 DC. 27 juillet 1994.

N de pourvoi: 00-14564. Cour de cassation; 9 octobre 2001.

Bert D. The light of judgment Mercier! Rec Dalloz 2010; 28(7433): 1801-1802.

N de pourvoi: 09-13591. Cour de cassation, chambre civile 1; 3 juin 2010.

Cobbs v. Grant. California: Supreme Court; 1972.

Pizzalotto v. Wilson. Louisiana: Court of Appeals; 1983.

Haskins v. Howard. Tennessee: Supreme Court; 1929.

Gouse v. Cassel. Pennsylvania: Supreme Court; 1992.

Fogal v Genesee Hospital. New York: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court; 1973.

Housh v. Morris. Tennessee: Court of Appeals; 1991.

Matthies v. Mastromonaco. New Jersey: Supreme Court; 1999.

Shehee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. Louisiana: United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; 1954.

Skripek v. Bergamo. New Jersey: Appellate Division of Superior Court; 1985.

Elliott C, Quinn F. Tort Law. 7th ed. England: Harlow, Pearson Longman; 2009.

Bal BS. An Introduction to Medical Malpractice in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467(2): 339–347.

Costa v. Regents of Univ. of California. California: District Court of Appeal; 1953.

Roybal v. Bell. Wyoming: Supreme Court; 1989.

Khoshnoudi R. Development in the Concept of Medical Malpractice and its Instances in the French Legal System. Medical Law Journal 2013; 7(26): 41-64.

Jourdain P. Failure to comply with the duty to information medical causes damage that must be repaired (reversal of jurisprudence). RTD Civ 2010; 3(1): 559-580.

G'Sell-Macrez F. Medical malpractice and compensation in France: Part I: the French rules of medical liability since the patients' rights law of march 4, 2002. Chi-Kent L Rev 2011; 86(3): 1093-1123.

Shoarian E, Ebadzadeh H. Obligations Arising from Treatment Contract with Emphasis on Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). Medical Law Journal 2016; 10(38): 41-71.