The Path of Evolution of Ethical Principles in Medical Research: A Comparative Comparison of the 2013 and 2024 Declaration of Helsinki
akhlāq-i pizishkī i.e., Medical Ethics,
Vol. 19 (1404),
25 September 2025
,
Page 1-4
https://doi.org/10.22037/mej.v19i-.51065
Abstract
Given the accelerating advancements in health technologies and the increasing ethical complexity of medical research, revising foundational guidance documents is imperative. The Declaration of Helsinki, as the cornerstone of human research ethics, has responded to these needs with the publication of its eighth revision in 2024 . This letter aims to provide a comparative content analysis of the 2013 and 2024 versions and explore their implications for the future of research ethics. The present analysis reveals that a key evolution is the paradigm shift from "research subject" to "participant", centering human agency and dignity. This shift underpins new emphases on structural justice, the necessity for meaningful and sustained engagement with local communities and the integration of environmental sustainability considerations into research design. Furthermore, for the first time, the Declaration explicitly addresses the ethical challenges of artificial intelligence and big data research, emphasizing transparency, accountability and the avoidance of algorithmic bias. The unprecedented strengthening of the oversight role and authority of ethics committees, along with clearer regulations on conflict of interest and dynamic informed consent, are other strengths of this revision. Overall, the 2024 Declaration has evolved from an individual-centric protective framework into a dynamic, socially-conscious and forward-looking document capable of guiding research in an era of technological complexity and global inequity. The success of this new framework depends on the continuous education of researchers, the strengthening of oversight institutions and a commitment to equitable international collaboration.
- Declaration of Helsinki
- ; Research Ethics
- Research Participant
- Ethics Committee
How to Cite
References
1. Topol E. Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again: Hachette UK; 2019.
2. Tobias J, Applewhite MK, Angelos P. The 2024 World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and Its Importance for Thyroidology. Thyroid. 2025;35(5):457-9.
3. Horn R. In a time of growing awareness of the need of joint ethical approaches to cur-rent global challenges, this book proposes a novel framework of ‘living ethics’ to better understand, analyse and address everyday ethical challenges in various settings such as healthcare, education, and politics.
4. Pratt B, de Vries J. Community engagement in global health research that advances health equity. Bioethics. 2018;32(7):454-63.
5. Kivikangas JM, Fernández-Castilla B, Järvelä S, Ravaja N, Lönnqvist J-E. Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2021;147(1):55.
6. Ratti E, Morrison M, Jakab I. Ethical and social considerations of applying artificial intelligence in healthcare-a two-pronged scoping review. BMC Medical Ethics. 2025;26(1):68.
7. Abimbola S, Asthana S, Montenegro C, Guinto RR, Jumbam DT, Louskieter L, et al. Addressing power asymmetries in global health: imperatives in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS Medicine. 2021;18(4):e1003604.
8. Evans BJ. Ethical Oversight and Social Licensing of Portable MRI Research. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2024;52(4):851-67.
9. Klitzman R. The ethics police?: The struggle to make human research safe. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
10. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447-53.
11. Bibbins-Domingo K, Brubaker L, Curfman G. The 2024 revision to the Declaration of Helsinki: modern ethics for medical research. JAMA. 2025;333(1):30-1.
12. Kaye J, Whitley EA, Lund D, Morrison M, Teare H, Melham K. Dynamic consent: A patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. European Journal of human Genetics. 2015;23(2):141-6.
13. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics: Edicoes Loyola; 1994.
14. Morales JAB, Zarabadi S. Towards posthumanism in education: Theoretical entanglements and pedagogical mappings: Taylor & Francis; 2024.
- Abstract Viewed: 72 times