A Reflection on the Existence and Nature of "Free-will" in the Context of Neurolaw and Neuroethics
akhlāq-i pizishkī i.e., Medical Ethics,
Vol. 17 No. 48 (1402),
21 August 2023
,
Page 1-19
https://doi.org/10.22037/mej.v17i48.42099
Abstract
Background and Aim: Proponents of the school of neurodeterminism, based on new findings from neuroscience, believe in the illusion of free will in man and claim that all individuals are under the control and dictatorship of their brains. Do we really have free will? Is free will an illusory abstract concept or a real quality in man? What is the definition of human free will in light of the new findings of human knowledge? The answer to these questions is important because the denial of free will means the denial of any criminal responsibility and in general the denial of the existence of the rules of criminal law in the normative order of society. This perception can turn into anarchy. The present article seeks to provide a convincing answer to the rejection of the skepticism introduced by the school of neurodeterminism and to redefine free will by examining the interdisciplinary approach of law, ethics and cognitive neuroscience.
Methods: This research is of theoretical type and the research method is descriptive-analytical and the method of data collection is library and has been done by referring to documents, books and articles.
Ethical Considerations: In order to organize this research, while observing the authenticity of the texts, honesty and fidelity have been observed.
Results: Consciousness is central to the definition of free will; Consciousness is self-awareness, which awareness (in the narrow sense) and arousal are the necessary means for its realization.
Conclusion: Free will includes a range of substantive and necessary elements in a coherent and inextricably linked sequence: motivation includes intention and delibration (in the words of Islamic philosophers, imagination, acknowledgment and enthusiasm) and determination includes the potential for preparation, awareness of intention and action. With these words, free will can be defined as follows: An intrinsic ability to perform conscious behavior based on purpose and reflection, which is realized in a range of elements from motivation to action.
- Neurolaw
- Determinism
- Neuroethics
- Free-Will
- Criminal Responsibility
How to Cite
References
Maulana J. Masnavi Manavi. 7th ed. Tehran: Amir Kabir; 2020. [Persian]
Brass M, Furstenberg A, Mele AR. Why neuroscience does not disprove free will. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019; 102: 251-263.
Singh N. A Perspective on Free Will, Neuroscience and Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: OUP; 2022.
Caruso GD. Rejecting retributivism: Free will, punishment and criminal justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.
Petoft A. Neurolaw: A brief introduction. Iranian Journal of Neurology. 2015; 14(1): 53-67. [Persian]
Morse SJ. Determinism and the death of folk psychology: Two challenges to responsibility from neuroscience. Minn JL Sci & Tech. 2008; 9(1): 1-7.
Nobahar R, Khatteshab M. Free will as a pillar of criminal responsibility in the debate between compatibilism and non-compatibilism. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 2017; 5(9): 87-113. [Persian]
Abassi M, Petoft A. Fundamentals of Neurolaw. Tehran: Medical Ethics and Law Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; 2019. [Persian]
Laws DR. Criminal Anthropology: Lombroso’s Search for Criminal Man. A History of the Assessment of Sex Offenders: 1830-2020. London: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2020.
Petoft A, Abbasi M. A historical overview of law and neuroscience: From the emergence of medico-legal discourses to developed neurolaw. Journal on European History of Law. 2019; 10(2): 15-33. [Persian]
Catello R. Who gave historical criminology a name? A history of 20th-century historical criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice. 2023; 85(1): 10-54.
Lawrence P. Historical criminology and the explanatory power of the past. Criminology & Criminal Justice. 2019; 19(4): 493-511.
Rafalovich A. Conflict and complementarity: Medicalization, criminalization and the question of human agency. Deviant Behavior. 2020; 41(7): 868-881.
Wright JD. Compatibilist libertarianism: Why it talks past the traditional free will problem and determinism is still a worry. Journal of the American Philosophical Association. 2022; 8(4): 604-622.
Mele AR. Free will and luck: Compatibilism versus incompatibilism. The Monist. 2020; 103(3): 262-277.
Kitossa T. Criminology as Epistemic Necropolitics. Social Transformations: Journal of the Global South. 2020; 8(2): 89-123.
Morse SJ. Criminal law and common sense: An essay on the perils and promise of neuroscience. Marq L Rev. 2015; 99(1): 39-48.
Greene J, Cohen J. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2004; 359(1451): 1775-1779.
Petoft A, Abbasi M. Current limits of neurolaw: A brief overview. Médecine & Droit. 2020; 2020(161): 29-34.
Smith K. Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will. Nature. 2011; 477(7362): 23-25.
Fifel K. Readiness potential and neuronal determinism: New insights on Libet experiment. Journal of Neuroscience. 2018; 38(4): 784-786.
Morse SJ. Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: A diagnostic note. Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 2005; 3(1): 397-405.
Morse SJ. Brain Overclaim Syndrome and Criminal. Neuroethics: An Introduction with Readings. Oxford: OUP; 2010.
Morse SJ. Brain overclaim redux. Law & Ineq. 2012; 31(1): 509-603.
Fields D. The Neuroscience of Violence, Again. Lancet. 2016; 387(2): 1847-1855.
Mark VH, Ervin FR. Violence and the Brain. London: Harper & Row; 1970.
Opderbeck DW. The problem with neurolaw. Louis ULJ. 2013; 58(3): 497-503.
Lyashenko O. The Problem with Fearing the Unknown: A Response to David Opderbeck’s the Problem with Neuro Law. Saint Louis University Law Journal. 2019; 59(11): 11-17.
Gkotsi GM, Gasser J. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2016; 46(5): 58-67.
Ekhtiari H, Nasseri P, Yavari F, Mokri A, Monterosso J. Neuroscience of drug craving for addiction medicine: From circuits to therapies. Progress in Brain Research. 2016; 223(6): 115-141.
Braun MN, Wessler J, Friese M. A meta-analysis of Libet-style experiments. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2021; 128(9): 182-198.
Kashfi AR, Tayefehrostami M. Allameh Tabatabaei and William Craig on Theological Fatalism; A Comparison Study. Contemporary Wisdom. 2016; 6(3): 75-100. [Persian]
Willoughby EA, Love AC, McGue M, Iacono WG, Quigley J, Lee JJ. Free will, determinism and intuitive judgments about the heritability of behavior. Behavior Genetics. 2019; 49(2): 136-153.
Mudrik L, Arie IG, Amir Y, Shir Y, Hieronymi P, Maoz U, et al. Free will without consciousness?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2022; 26(7): 555-566.
Roskies A. Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2006; 10(9): 419-423.
Roskies AL. The Neuroscience of Free Will. U St Thomas JL & Pub Pol'y. 2021; 15(3): 162-174.
Evers K. Variable determinism in social applications: translating science to society. Intellectica. 2021; 2(75): 73-89.
Lavazza A. Free will and neuroscience: From explaining freedom away to new ways of operationalizing and measuring it. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2016; 10(9): 233-262.
Petoft A, Abbasi M, Zali A. Toward children’s cognitive development from the perspective of neurolaw: implications of Roper v Simmons. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2023; 30(2): 144-160. [Persian]
Fountoulakis KN. Consciousness and Free Will. The Human Connectome: How the Brain Works. Berlin: Springer; 2022.
Koch C. What is consciousness. Nature. 2018; 557(7704): 8-12.
Lee M, Sanz LR, Barra A, Wolff A, Nieminen JO, Boly M, et al. Quantifying arousal and awareness in altered states of consciousness using interpretable deep learning. Nature Communications. 2022; 13(1): 1064-1074.
Pfaff D. How brain arousal mechanisms work: Paths toward consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019.
Petoft A. Loss of Free Will Causes; Interdisciplinary Analysis of Law and Cognitive Neuroscience. Medical Law Journal. 2022; 16(57): 480-495. [Persian]
Nestor PG. In defense of free will: Neuroscience and criminal responsibility. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2019; 65(2): 10-44.
Mele AR. Libet on free will: Readiness potentials, decisions and awareness. Conscious will and responsibility: A tribute to Benjamin Libet. Oxford: OUP; 2010.
Kamble P. What is Subconscious Mind? How Does it Impact our Behaviour? How Does it Impact our Behaviour. Oxford: OUP; 2021.
Seidi A, Lahootiyan H, Mohammadi Monfared B. Free Will and the Problem of Determinism in the Theory of Dominion. Naqd Va Nazar. 2021; 26(103): 60-87. [Persian]
Shirazi SA-D, Ibrahim MB. Al-Madat wa Maad. Translation and description of the first part of the book Al-Mubadad and Al-Maad. Qom: Ishraq Publications; 2004. [Persian]
Petoft A, Abbasi M. Children’s Criminal Perception; Lessons from Neurolaw. Child Indicators Research. 2022; 15(5): 1905-1920.
Petoft A, Abbasi M, Zali A. Loss of Free will in the Iranian Criminal Justice System: Interdisciplinary Analysis of Law and Neuroscience. Social Neuroscience. 2023; 12(1): 11-38. [Persian]
Petoft A, Abbasi M, Zali A. The Validation Requirments of Neurscientific Evidences before Courts. Medical Law Journal. 2021; 15(56): 431-443. [Persian]
Petoft A. An overview of the technical limitations of applying the fMRI method in neurolaw. Bioethics Journal. 2019; 9(34): 95-107. [Persian]
- Abstract Viewed: 494 times