Assessing the compliance of the pesticide labels used by farmers in Sahneh city with the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) of classification and labeling
Journal of Behdasht dar Arseh (i.e., Health in the Field),
Vol. 9 No. 4 (1400),
31 July 2022
,
Page 19-28
https://doi.org/10.22037/jhf.v9i4.37458
Abstract
Background and Aims: Labels are the simplest and most accessible means of transmitting information on health, safety and environmental risks of pesticides for farmers. In this study, the degree of compliance of pesticide labels in the consumer market of Sahneh city with Globally Harmonized System (GHS) was investigated.
Materials and Methods: The labels of pesticides available in the consumer market were assessed according to seven important elements in GHS including: (1) name and identification code of pesticide, (2) word of warning, (3) danger phrase that shows the nature and severity of the danger, (4) precautionary phrases and first aid, (5) supplier identity, (6) Pictograms, and (7) SDS (safety data sheet) and the data was analyzed in Excel software. Ethical considerations were taken into account at all stages.
Results: In total, 186 labels were reviewed in which only 30% of them had the name and code of pesticide identification fully registered, 21% of the tags contained the word warning, 76% of the tags held dangerous phrases, and 91% of the tags involved precautionary expressions and first aid. The identity of the supplier was seen in 98.7% and only 2% of the labels carried the GHS pictogram. None of the pesticides had SDS sheets even in electronic form.
Conclusion: The current labeling method needs to be revised and modified to be effective in providing warnings to farmers. It is necessary to inform all companies of the same format and in accordance with the GHS system by the Pesticide Supervision Board and to implement it compulsorily with incentive policies.
- Pesticide, Health, Safety, Environment, Label, GHS, Globally Harmonized System
How to Cite
References
- Ganji A, Safavi M, Nouraei M, Naseri Moghadam S, MERAT SH, Vahedi H, Malekzadeh R. Digestive and liver diseases statistics in several referral centers in Tehran, 2000-2004. Govaresh 2006; 11(1):33-38 (In Persian).
- Jahani MA, Eskandari FZ, Mahmoudjanloo Sh, Mahmoudi Gh. The causes of the mortality of inpatients in the hospitals covered by semnan province universities of medical sciences based on ICD10. Journal of Healthcare Management Research 2017; 8(3):7-16 (In Persian).
- Ministry of Health and Medical Education. http://deathregistry.behdasht.gov.ir/Available:2021, Accessed Sep 21, 2021.
- UNECE.https://unece.org/transport/standards/transport/dangerous-goods/ghs-rev9-2021, Accessed Feb 30, 2021.
- Bagheri A, Pirmoazen S, Allahyari MS. Assessment of farmers’ understanding of the pictograms displayed on pesticide labels. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021; 28(14):17812-25.
- Bondori A, Bagheri A, Sookhtanlou M, Jamshidi O, Norozi A. Assessing farmers' knowledge of moghan plain about the consequences of chemical pesticides for community health, the environment, and food security. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment 2020; 12(4):621-38 (In Persian).
- Saqi MH, Malayedari R, Rostaghi S, Rastgar A, Rezaei H. Survey of knowledge, attitude and practice of farmers for aspects of pesticides in jouvin. Scientific-Research Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences 2019; 27 (4):513-19 (In Persian).
- Dayanidhi VK, Hegde SP, Chendrashekaran P, Begum Kh. A cross-sectional survey on the awareness of pesticide labels and pesticide safety pictograms among paddy farming in south India. Journal of Health Science Surveillance System 2016; 4(4):158-166.
- Mohd Fadhil HA, Yazid Goh Ch, Mazlin Mokhtar T. Classified chemicals in accordance with the globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals: comparison of lists of the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and New Zealand. Safety and Health at Work 2020; 11(2):152-58.
- Rother HA. South African farm workers’ interpretation of risk assessment data expressed as pictograms on pesticide labels. Environmental Research 2008; 108(3):419-27.
- Persson L, Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen S, Lai A, Persson A, Fick S. The globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals-explaining the legal implementation gap. Sustainability 2017; 9(12):2176-83.
- Jalalian H, Javed L, Javan F, Ghasemiyan Z. Measuring villagers' awareness of sustainable agriculture in order to preserve the natural ecosystem (case study: rural settlements along lake Zarivar). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2020; 22(12):197-207 (In Persian).
- Fayazi A, Pouyakian M, Jafari MJ, Khodakarim S. A survey among three Iranian occupational groups: general knowledge of chemical safety and familiarity with ghs and outdated labeling systems. ACS Chemical Health & Safety 2020; 27(1):43-51.
- Morita T, Morikawa K. Expert review for ghs classification of chemicals on health effects. Industrial Health 2011; 49(5):559-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.MS1267.
- Boelhouwer E, Davis J, Franco-Watkins A, Dorris N, Lungu C. Comprehension of hazard communication: effects of pictograms on safety data sheets and labels. Journal of Safety Research 2013; 46: 145-55.
- Fayazi A, Pouyakian M, Jafari MJ, Khodakarim S. Development and validation of two awareness and current status assessment questionnaires for the hazardous chemically-exposed staffs though globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS). Journal of Health and Safety at Work 2019; 9(1): 29-39 (In Persian).
- Abstract Viewed: 210 times