Defensive the Idea of Recompense in Responsibilities Subsequent from the Fault and Fraud of Managers from the Viewpoint of Citizenship Rights
Akhlāq-i zīstī i.e., Bioethics Journal,
Vol. 8 No. 1 (1397),
2 Aban 2018
,
Page 363-374
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v8i1.32710
Abstract
Background and Aim: Recompence of errands resulting from fault and fraud of managers is one of the contests of advancing domestic laws for the rights of the victims, as well as in the field of bankruptcy, the determination of this article is to study the internal laws to recognize and achieve the assets and weaknesses of these responsibilities and boundaries to help the rights of the losses, as well as stockholders and third revelries, which in a comprehensive view, considers citizens.
Materials & Methods: Descriptive-analytical methods as one of the qualitative methods for investigating communal and human issues have a high gradation of validity, bearing in mind the subject of this debate, using descriptive-analytical method and using biopic and library resources have been designated as research method.
Findings: The impression of compensation for residency rights in the issue of responsibilities ascending from the fault and fraud of managers and from a jurisprudential and legal point of view founded on the rule of waste, waste, Tasbib (authorship indirect destruction), incapability, violation of the powers and disgraces of managers is considerable by examining the role of the manager in the formation of fault and fraud, the idea of reimbursement for their responsibility for the rights of civilization and citizens is substantial.
Conclusion: International recompence laws are effective based on universal and general rules, but in domestic law of Iran, jurisprudential rules are defensible as backers for compensation rendering to the rule of waste, waste, Tasbib (authorship indirect destruction) and also the powerlessness of managers. Consequently, one of the effective ways to classify and deal with the fault and fraud of managers from the perspective of citizenship rights is to secure the idea of compensation in order to compel managers to respond to citizens and to authorize the grounds for transparency and drill of managers.
Please cite this article as: Khatibzadeh HR, Paseban MR, Zaare' A. Defensive the Idea of Recompense in Responsibilities Subsequent from the Fault and Fraud of Managers from the Viewpoint of Citizenship Rights. Bioethics Journal, Special Issue on Citizenship Rights, Autumn 2018; 363-374.
- Recompence; Citizenship Rights; Managers' Fault; Managers' Fraud
How to Cite
References
Dehkhoda AA. Dictionary. Tehran: University of Tehran Publications; 2006. [Persian]
Jaafari Langroodi MJ. Legal terminology. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh Publications; 2003. [Persian]
Ghaem Magham Farahani MH. Babkruptcy and lIquidation. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2006. [Persian]
Eftekhari J. Bankruptcy. Tehran: Ghoghnoos Publications; 2000. [Persian]
Erfani M. Business Law. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2003. [Persian]
Rahmdel M. Bankruptcy to blame. Journal of Law and Political Sceince 2007; 2(37): 113-138. [Persian]
Matin A. Collection of Judicial procedure. Tehran: Hashemi Publications; 1970. [Persian]
Katouzian N. Legal Events. Tehran: Publisher Sahami Enteshar; 2006. [Persian]
Safaei H, Rahimi H. Civil Liability. Tehran: Samt Publications; 2011. [Persian]
Ghasemzadeh M. Fundamental of Civil Liability. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2008. [Persian]
Amiri Ghaem Magham AM. Rights of obligations. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2006. [Persian]
Bahrami Ahmadi H. Civil Liability. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2009. [Persian]
Mousavi Bojnoordi M. Rules of Jurisprudence. Tehran: Amjad Publications; 2006. [Persian]
Amid Zanjani AA. Guaranteed Causes. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2003. [Persian]
Katouzian N. Complusory Liability. Tehran: Jihad University Publications; 1983. [Persian]
Mohaghegh Damad M. Rules of Jurisprudence. Tehran: Olom Islami Publications; 1994. [Persian]
Shahri G. Rights to register documents and property. Tehran: Majed Publications; 1998. [Persian]
Pourbadakhshan J, Darvishzadeh M. Types of rules and how to deal with Iranian Law. Tehran: Javdaneh Publications; 2011. [Persian]
Eskini R. Babkruptcy Litigation. Tehran: Samt Publications; 2010. [Persian]
Katouzian N. Non-Contractual requirements. Tehran: University of Tehran Publications; 2003. [Persian]
- Abstract Viewed: 241 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 92 times