Developments in the Principle of the Right to Receive Medical Assistance in the Event of Disasters in the Light of International soft Law
Tārīkh-i pizishkī i.e., Medical History,
Vol. 8 No. 28 (1395),
7 November 2019
,
Page 85-103
https://doi.org/10.22037/mhj.v8i28.32488
Abstract
There is a small number of binding international documents on the issue of the right to receive medical assistance in response to natural and man-made disasters. In recent years, however, soft law instruments have been developed in this area, including the draft articles on the protection of persons in the event of a disaster, adopted by the UNHCR, the UN Guidelines on Internal Displacement, and the Code of Conduct for the Red Cross. And mention the Red Crescent and the humanitarian charter and the minimum standards in response to disasters. Although these documents are not binding, they can play an important role in creating convergence and coordination among international actors to provide medical assistance. Simply put, these non-binding documents play a role in the process of shaping international customs. On the other hand, in drafting articles on the protection of persons in the event of a disaster, the International Law Commission has taken into account the importance of non-binding standards and norms to develop an internationally acceptable legal framework for the protection of victims of disasters. Given this importance, in the present study, in order to better understand the principles and standards related to humanitarian aid, we should examine the provisions of these documents.
Please cite this article as: Alizadeh Y, Masoudinia M, Rostami S, Beyranvand F. Developments in the Principle of the Right to Receive Medical Assistance in the Event of Disasters in the Light of International Soft Law. Med Hist J 2016; 8(28): 85-103.
- Medical Assistance; Medical Services; Soft Law; Non-Binding Standards
How to Cite
References
Sousa S. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. p.490-495.
Jürgen F. International Environmental soft law: The Functions and Limits of Nonbinding Instruments in International Environmental Governance and Law. New York: Springer; 2013. p.216.
Mackintosh K. The Principles of Humanitarian Action in International Humanitarian Law. Geneva: Overseas Development Institute; 2000. p.1-4.
Francioni F, Ronzitti N. War by Contract: Human Rights, Humanitarian Law and Private Contractors. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. p.209, 427.
Fisher D. The Right to Humanitarian Assistance. In: Kälin W. Incorporating the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement into Domestic Law: Issues and Challenges. New York: ASIL & Brookings-Bern Project on Internal Displacement; 2010. p.48, 51-52.
Dupuy A. Declaratory Law and Programmatory Law: From Revolutionary Custom to Soft Law. In: R. Akkerman R. Declarations of Principles: A Quest for Universal Peace. London: Springer; 1977. p.252.
McNair A. The law of treaties. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1961. p.345-489.
Klabbers J. The Redundancy of Soft Law. Nordic Journal of International Law 1996; 65(32): 173-180.
Aspremont J. Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials. European Journal of Law 2008; 19(5): 1075-1093.
Weil P. Towards Relative Normativity in International Law. The American Journal of International Law 1983; 77(3): 414-420.
Brownlie I. Principles of public international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. p.3-4.
Meyer T. Soft Law as Delegation. Fordham International Law Journal 2008; 32(3): 910-915.
Amato A. Softness in International Law: A Self Serving Quest for New Legal Materials: A Reply to Jean d’Aspremont. The European Journal of International Law 2009; 20(3): 897-910
Aspremont J. Softness in International Law: A Self-Serving Quest for New Legal Materials: A Rejoinder to Tony D’Amato. The European Journal of International Law 2009; 20(3): 911-917.
Klabbers J. The Undesirability of Soft Law. Nordic Journal of International Law 1998; 67(1): 381-390.
Klabbers J. The Concept of Treaty in International Law. Hague: Kluwer Law International; 1998. p.157.
Senden L. Soft Law in European Community Law. London: Hart publishing; 2004. p.112-113.
Rosenne S. Developments in the Law of Treaties 1945-1986. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. p.104, 107.
Aust A. Modern Treaty Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p.21.
Judgement (Merits), Corfu Channel Case (UK v. Albania), ICJ. 1949. p.22.
Advisory Opinion, Legal Consequences for States for the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), ICJ. 1971. p.50.
Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012. para.99.
Damrosch L. International Law: Cases and Materials. New York: West Academic; 2014. p.142-158.
Cassesse A. International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. p.160-161.
Fritz M. Non-binding Agreement. In: Bernhardt R. Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Berlin: Max-Planck Institution; 1991. Vol.7 p.354-355, 357.
Hartmut H. A Fresh look at Soft Law. European Journal of International Law 1990; 10(3): 499-504.
Blutman L. In The Trap of a Legal Metaphor: International Soft Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2010; 59(1): 607-608.
Thürer D. Soft Law. The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law 2013; 9(1): 269-277.
Shelton D. Normative Hierarchy in International Law. The American Journal of International Law 2006; 100(2): 291-322.
Meron T. On a Hierarchy of International Human Rights. The American Journal of International Law 1986; 80(90): 1-23.
Fastenrath U. Relative Normativity in International Law. European Journal of International Law 1993; 4(3): 305-340.
Koskenniemi M. Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch. European Journal of International Law 1997; 8(4): 566-582.
Paulus A, Weiler H. The Structure of Change in International Law or Is There a Hierarchy of Norms in International Law?. European Journal of International Law 1997; 8(4): 545-565.
Charney J. Universal International Law. The American Journal of International Law 1993; 87(4): 544-550.
Kälin W. How Hard is Soft Law? The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement and the Need for a Normative Framework. Hague: Ralph Bunche Institute for International Studies; 2001. p.8.
International Law Commission, Draft articles on the protection of persons in the event of disasters, with commentaries. 2016. Commentary of article.1, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16.
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Guidelines for the Domestic Facilitation and Regulation of International Disaster Relief and Initial Recovery Assistance. Geneva: IFRCRC; 2007. Guideline.4 para.1.
The Inter-Agency Standing Committee Operational Guidelines on Human Rights and Natural Disasters, A/HRC/4/38/Add.1, annex. 2006.
Corfu Channel case, Judgment of April 9th, I.C.J. Reports 1949. p.22.
Lefkowit D. The Sources of International Law: Some Philosophical Reflections. In: Besson S, Tasioulas J. The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p.189-190.
Strengthening of the Coordination of Humanitarian Emergency Assistance of the United Nations, General Assembly Res.65/133. 2011.
Safety and Security of Humanitarian Personnel and Protection of United Nations Personnel, General Assembly Res.65/132. 2011.
International Cooperation on Humanitarian Assistance in the Field of Natural Disasters, from Relief to Development, General Assembly Res. 65/264. 2011.
Assistance in Cases of Natural Disaster and other Disaster Situations, GA Res.2816 (XXVI). 1972.
Strengthening of the Coordination of Humanitarian Emergency Assistance of the United Nations, General Assembly Res.46/182. 1991.
Tsui E. Analysis of Normative Developments in Humanitarian Resolutions since the Adoption of 46/182. Geneva: UNOCHA; 2009. p.6.
Katoch A. International Natural Disaster Response and the United Nations. In: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. International Disaster Response Laws, Principles and Practice: reflections, prospects and challenges. Geneva: IFRC; 2003. p.12-29.
Resolutions adopted by the 21st International Conference of the Red Cross, Resolution XXIV: Principles and Rules for Red Cross Disaster Relief’, 104 IRRC 625-631. 1969.
Hilhorst D. A Living Document? The Code of Conduct of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and NGOs in Disaster Relief, Research paper produced for the conference Ten Years Code of Conduct: Principles in Practice. Washington: Wageningen University Press; 2004. p.5.
Hilhorst D. Dead or Alive? Ten Years of the Code of Conduct for Disaster Relief. Humanitarian Exchange Magazine 2005; 29(1): 12-19.
Bugnion F. Red Cross Law. International Review of the Red Cross 1995; 308(1): 492-500.
United Nations, Commission on Human Rights, the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1998/53/Add.2. 1998.
Cohen R. The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement: An Innovation in International Standard Setting. Global Governance 2004; 10(1): 459-470.
Rothchild D. Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa. London: Brookings Institution Press; 1996. p.7-31.
Kälin W. Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement: Annotations, the American Society of International Law and the Brookings Institution. University of Bern Project on Internal Displacement. Studies in Transnational Legal Policy 2008; 38(1): 7-10.
Entwisle H. Tracing Cascades: The Normative Development of the U.N. Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 2005; 19(1): 384-396.
Cohen R. Reconciling R2P with IDP Protection. Geneva: Brookings-LSE Project on Internal Displacement; 2010. p.8.
International Cooperation on Humanitarian Assistance in the Field of Natural Disasters, from Relief to Development, GA Res.65/264. 2011.
Beyranvand F. The procedure of national courts in confronting with international soft law with emphasis on international humanitarian law. Ph.D. Dissertation. Tehran: Islamic Azad University; 2020. p.325. [Persian]
Caron D. Contemporary International Law Issues in the Asia Pacific: The Importance and Challenge of the Difference between Principles and Rules in International Law. International Law Association Asia-Pacific Regional Conference Contemporary International Law Issues in the Asia Pacific: Opportunities and Challenges. 2011. Available at: http://www.works.bepress.com/david_caron/118/.
- Abstract Viewed: 494 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 146 times