فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی بهداشت در عرصه

- Villa V, Paltrinieri N, Khan F, Cozzani V. Towards dynamic risk analysis: A review of the risk assessment approach and its limitations in the chemical process industry. Safety Science 2016; 89:77-93.

- Fernández-Muñiz B, Montes-Peón JM, Vázquez-Ordás CJ. Occupational risk management under the OHSAS 18001 standard: analysis of perceptions and attitudes of certified firms. Journal of Cleaner Production 2012; 24:36-47.

- Aven T. Risk analysis: Assessing uncertainties beyond expected values and probabilities Chichester: Wiley; 2008.

- Goncalves Filho AP, Jun GT, Waterson P. Four studies, two methods, one accident–An examination of the reliability and validity of Accimap and STAMP for accident analysis. SafetyScience 2019; 113:310-17.

- Qing-gui C, Kai L, Ye-jiao L, Qi-hua S, Jian Z. Risk management and workers’ safety behavior control in coal mine. Safety Science 2012; 50(4):909-13.

- Accou B, Reniers G. Developing a method to improve safety management systems based on accident investigations: The Safety Fractal Analysis. Safety Science 2019; 115:285-93.

- Khakkar S, Ranjbarian M, Pouyakian M. Study of CFSES software compliance with Iranian national standards for fire safety assessment of commercial complexes. Journal of Health in the Field 2019; 7(1): 26-35.

- Mahdevari S, Shahriar K, Esfahanipour A. Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS. Science of the Total Environment 2014; 488:85-99.

- Jaafari A, Anderson J. Risk assessment on development projects, the case of lost opportunities. Australian Institute of Building Papers 1995; 6:21-36.

- Marhavilas P-K, Koulouriotis D, Gemeni V. Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2011; 24(5):477-523.

- Tixier J, Dusserre G, Salvi O, Gaston D. Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2002; 15(4):291-303.

- Ning X, Qi J, Wu C. A quantitative safety risk assessment model for construction site layout planning. Safety Science 2018; 104:246-59.

- Ericson CA. Hazard analysis techniques for system safety. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2015.

- De Almeida AG, Vinnem JE. Major accident prevention illustrated by hydrocarbon leak case studies: A comparison between Brazilian and Norwegian offshore functional petroleum safety regulatory approaches. Safety science 2020; 121:652-65.

- Xiang Y, Liu C, Chao C, Liu H. Risk analysis and assessment of public safety of Submerged Floating Tunnel. Procedia Engineering 2010; 4:117-25.

- Nieto-Morote A, Ruz-Vila F. A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management 2011; 29(2):220-31.

- Yarahmai R, Moridi P. Health, Safety and Environmental Risk Assessment in Laboratory Sites. Journal of Health and Safety at Work 2012; 2(1):11-26.

- Ardeshir A, Amiri M, Mohajeri M. Safety risk assessment in mass housing projects using combination of Fuzzy FMEA, Fuzzy FTA and AHP-DEA. Iran Occupational Health 2013; 10(6):78-91.

- Ellenbecker MJ. Engineering controls as an intervention to reduce worker exposure. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1996; 29(4):303-07.

- Reason J. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Oxfordshire. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing; 1997.

- Viner MD. Occupational Risk Control: Predicting and Preventing the Unwanted. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing; 2015.

- Gul M, Guneri AF. A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: a case study for aluminum industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2016; 40:89-100.

- Barnes M. Risk assessment workbook for mines. Metalliferous, extractive and opal mines, and quarries. Mine Safety Operations Workbook. Hunter Region: Industry & Investment NSW; 2009.

- Duraccio V, Gnoni MG, Mora C. An integrated holistic approach to health and safety in confined spaces. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2018; 55:25-35.

- Arghami S, Pouya kian M. Safety at Workplace 1. Fanavaran: Tehran; 201 (In Persian).

- Karami, E., Goodarzi, Z., Rashidi, R., & Karimi, A. (2020). Assessing human errors in sensitive jobs using two methods, TAFEI and SHERPA: A case study in a high-pressure power post. Journal of Health in the Field 2020; 8(1):58-69.

- Haddon Jr W. Energy damage and the ten countermeasure strategies. Human Factors 1973; 15(4):355-66.

- Brauer RL. Safety and health for engineers. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.

- Deljavan R, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Fouladi N, Arshi S, Mohammadi R. Application of Haddon’s matrix in qualitative research methodology: an experience in burns epidemiology. International Journal of General Medicine 2012; 5:621-627.

- Albertsson P, Björnstig U, Falkmer T. The Haddon matrix, a tool for investigating severe bus and coach crashes. International Journal of Disaster Medicine 2003; 1(2):109-19.

- Lu T-H. Unalterable host factors? A social epidemiologist’s view of the Haddon matrix. Injury Prevention 2006; 12(5):285-86.

- Haddon Jr W. Approaches to prevention of injuries. Proceedings of the American Medical Association Conference on Prevention of Disabling Injuries.1983. Miami, USA.

- Runyan CW. Introduction: back to the future-revisiting Haddon’s conceptualization of injury epidemiology and prevention. Epidemiologic Reviews 2003; 25(1):60-64.

- Runyan CW. Using the Haddon matrix: introducing the third dimension. Injury Prevention 1998; 4(4):302-307.

- Hendershot DC. Inherently safer design: an overview of key elements. Professional Safety 2011; 56(2):48-55.

- Jafari MJ, Mohammadi H, Reniers G, Pouyakian M, Nourai F, Torabi SA, et al. Exploring inherent process safety indicators and approaches for their estimation: A systematic review. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2018; 52:66-80.

- Khan FI, Amyotte PR. I2SI: A comprehensive quantitative tool for inherent safety and cost evaluation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2005; 18(4):310-26.

- Kidam K, Sahak HA, Hassim MH, Shahlan SS, Hurme M. Inherently safer design review and their timing during chemical process development and design. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2016; 42:47-58.

- Zaini D, Pasha M, Kaura S. Inherently Safe Heat Exchanger Network Design by Consequence Based Analysis. Procedia Engineering 2016; 148:908-15.

- varvani Farahani P, Hekmat pou D, Amini H. Determination of the numerical scores of occupational hazards and their predisposing factors among nurses working in educational hospitals in Arak city. Journal of Nursing Education 2013; 1(2):53-61.

- Yang Q, Chin K-S, Li Y-L. A quality function deployment-based framework for the risk management of hazardous material transportation process. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2018; 52:81-92.

- Atehnjia DN, Yang Z, Wang J. Risk Control and Cost Benefit Analysis of Docking Operation. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and engineering 2018; 4(1):1-14.

- Kececi T, Arslan O. SHARE technique: A novel approach to root cause analysis of ship accidents. Safety Science 2017; 96:1-21.

- Young S. From zero to hero. A case study of industrial injury reduction: New Zealand Aluminium Smelters Limited. Safety Science 2014; 64:99-108.

- Vanem E, Endresen Ø, Skjong R. Cost-effectiveness criteria for marine oil spill preventive measures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2008; 93(9):1354-68.

- Fine WT. Mathematical evaluations for controlling hazards. Maryland: Naval Ordnance Lab White Oak; 1971.