Examining the Legal and Ethical Dimensions Related to Patients With Autism
Akhlāq-i zīstī i.e., Bioethics Journal,
Vol. 15 No. 40 (1404),
14 Tir 2025
,
Page 1-9
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v15i40.48473
Abstract
Background and Aim: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impairments in social interaction, verbal and non-verbal communication, and repetitive behaviors. In many societies, including Iran, individuals with this disorder face fundamental challenges in accessing their basic rights, such as education, treatment, employment, and decision-making. The aim of the present study is to examine the legal and ethical dimensions related to autistic patients in Iran and to align them with international legal systems.
Methods: This study was conducted using a descriptive-analytical method through a library research approach. For the comparative analysis, Iran's regulations were compared with the laws of the United States, the United Kingdom, and international documents, including the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Data were collected and analyzed from legal texts, scientific research, and valid international documents.
Ethical Considerations: The ethical principles of research, including respect for authors' rights, avoidance of plagiarism, impartiality in analyses, and observance of the human dignity of patients, have been observed. During some stages of writing, artificial intelligence tools were used for structural editing; however, the scientific and final responsibility for the article lies with the author.
Results: The research findings indicate that the Iranian legal system faces significant gaps in the areas of education, specialized treatment, informed consent, guardianship, and access to services for autistic patients. Additionally, the disregard for the human dignity and autonomy of these patients in policymaking is considered one of the major ethical challenges. In contrast, some countries have been able to provide more effective support by enacting specific laws and adopting a differentiated approach.
Conclusion: To achieve therapeutic, social, and ethical justice for patients with autism spectrum disorder, it is essential to revise laws, strengthen supportive decision-making models, and develop interdisciplinary policies based on international approaches.
- Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Health Law
- Guardianship
- Supported Decision-Making
- Inclusive Education
How to Cite
References
1. World Health Organization. Autism. Geneva: WHO; 2023.
2. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: UN; 2006; Rasmussen M, Lewis O. United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. International Legal Materials. 2007; 46(3): 441-466.
3. National Institute of Mental Health. Autism Spectrum Disorder. Bethesda: NIMH; 2022.
4. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington DC: APA; 2017.
5. Wehmeyer ML, Shogren KA. Beyond IQ: The Role of Supported Decision-Making in Educational Settings. J Educ Psychol. 2020; 112(4): 667-680.
6. Pellicano E, Dinsmore A, Charman T. What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom. Autism. 2014; 18(7): 756-770.
7. Kapp SK, Gillespie-Lynch K, Sherman LE, Hutman T. Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Dev Psychol. 2013; 49(1): 59-71.
8. Schalock RL, Verdugo MA, Braddock DL. Handbook on quality of life for human service practitioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation; 2002.
9. Thunborg C. Inclusive Education and the Nordic Welfare State: A Comparative Perspective. Scand J Educ Res. 2022; 66(5): 773-789.
10. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.
11. Peterson A, Karlawish J, Largent E. Supported decision making with people at the margins of autonomy. The American journal of bioethics. 2021; 21(11): 4-18.
12. Vincent J, Rowe H, Johnson J. Parity of participation for autistic students: Mapping provision across UK higher education institutions. Research in Education. 2022; 112(1): 20-38.
13. Liu BM, Paskov K, Kent J, Bishop SL, Durkin MS, Mandell DS. Racial and ethnic disparities in geographic access to autism resources across the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(1): e2251182.
14. Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1993.
15. Singer J. Neurodiversity: The Birth of an Idea. Lexington: Amazon Digital Services; 2017.
16. Arstein-Kerslake A, Flynn E. The right to legal agency: domination, disability and the protections of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. International Journal of Law in Context. 2017; 13(1): 22-38.
- Abstract Viewed: 86 times
- PDF (فارسی) Downloaded: 31 times