Social Outcomes of States' Support of Citizenship Welfare Rights; from Welfare to Postwelfare State
Akhlāq-i zīstī i.e., Bioethics Journal,
Vol. 13 No. 38 (1402),
28 May 2023
,
Page 1-13
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v13i38.39428
Abstract
Background and Aim: Since past time, societies have been encountered with such damages as diseases, poverty and death. Hence, it is for centuries that many states have attempted to reduce such damages via policymaking in order to realize citizens’ welfare rights. Social consequences of such initiatives are manifested in promoting citizens’ life quality level. Therefore, in the modern era, the social policies of the governments have been followed with different approaches from the past and have been influenced by the surrounding conditions of the societies.
Methods: Research methodology in present paper is based on cause-and-effect analysis of data and data collection technique is based on library and documents studying in order to respond raised hypothesis in the paper.
Ethical Considerations: In order to organize this research, while observing the authenticity of the texts, honesty and fidelity have been observed.
Results: Present paper findings suggest that today states have looked at human’s welfare rights through a new approach and have attempted to cover damages from people’s incapability such as unemployment, disability and senescence through wisdom of the crowd and utilizing social initiatives and policymaking in macro levels since such damages would yield to reduction in incomes and consequently, mitigation in welfare level and losing human dignity.
Conclusion: The focal point of efforts can be seen in theories resulted from establishing welfare state that could improve citizens’ welfare and life qualities through supportive policies and extending human security indicators in food supply, healthcare services and training and have enhanced life expectancy via a human development approach. Despite of this, states impacted by globalization, have pursued a postwelfare approach on social policymaking based on a minimum attitude toward supporting citizens’ welfare rights.
- Social Policymaking
- Postwelfare State
- Welfare State
- Welfare
- State’s Commitment
- Citizens’ Welfare Rights
How to Cite
References
Bashirieh H. The history of political ideas of the 20th century; Liberalism and conservatism. Tehran: Ney Publication; 1999. [Persian]
Tavasoli H. Individualism as the metaphysical depth of liberal thought. Ain-e Hikmat Quarterly. 2011; 3(7): 81-113. [Persian]
Ghaderi H. Political thoughts in the 20th century. Tehran: Samt Publication; 2001. [Persian]
Bashirieh H. Education of political knowledge (Fundamentals of theoretical and institutional politics). Tehran: Neghah-e Moaser P ublication; 2003. [Persian]
Fitiz Petrick T. New welfare theories. Translated by Homayounpour H. Tehran: Social Security Research Institute; 2006. [Persian]
Rahmatollahi H, Agha Mohammad Aghaee E. Contemplation on the relationship between the State and citizen: The transition from the absolute State to the constituted State. Tehran: Khorsandi Publication; 2016. [Persian]
Rahmatollahi H. Power Evolution (State and sovereignty from the dawn of history to the age of globalization). Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2009. [Persian]
Bashirieh H. Political Sociology. Tehran: Ney Publication; 1997. [Persian]
Chang KV. Privatization and development (theory, policy and evidence). Translated by Safar M. Tehran: Etrat No Publication (By Order of the Privatization Organization); 2009. [Persian]
Smith A. An Inquiry in to the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations. Edited by Cannan E. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1976. Vol.1.
Hayek FA. Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1949.
Fon Hayek F. Law, legislation and freedom (A new account of the libertarian principles of justice and political economy) Rules and order. Translated by Moeiri M, Ghaninejad M. Tehran: The World of Economy Publication; 2013. [Persian]
Hayek FA. Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Mirage of Social Justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1976. Vol.2.
Tohidfam M. Hayek & the Legal Democracy. Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Sciences. 2006; 73: 115-132. [Persian]
Ostevar M. Influence of Hayek's Idea on Political Ideologies of Right and Left. Political Quarterly. 2009; 38(4): 77-97. [Persian]
Sharifzadegan MH. Economic development strategies and social justice. Social Welfare Quarterly. 2007; 6(24): 30-39. [Persian]
Cebera A. The Paradigms for distinguishing between private law and public law. Kraków: Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University; 2014.
Ripstein A. Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 2009.
Rosenfeld M. Rethinking the Boundaries between Public Law and Private Law for the Twenty First Century: An Introduction. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2013; 11(1): 125-128.
Rahmatollahi H, Agha Mohammad Aghaee E. Advanced course of public law, philosophical-theological schools of public law (2), Natural rights and Positives rights and their effects on the power structure and public law. Tehran: Majd Publication; 2020. [Persian]
Ghafari GH, Omidi RA. Quality of life index of social development (Studying Iran's civil and development programs). Tehran: Shirazeh Publishing and Research; 2011. [Persian]
Alem A. Foundations of political science. Tehran: Ney Publication; 2009. [Persian]
Kapstein EB. Workers and the World Economy. Foreign Affairs. 1996; 75(3): 16-37.
Rahmatollahi H, Agha Mohammad Aghaee E. A new vision at the basics of public law (Concepts and values). Tehran: Sherkat Sahami Enteshar Publishing; 2021. [Persian]
Ghari Seyed Fatemi SM. Human Rights in the contemporary world (second book). Tehran: Shahr Danesh Legal Studies and Research Institute; 2009. [Persian]
Khaleghparast H. Expert report on the theory of the state and the optimal mechanism of social security with an emphasis on Iran's legal system. Tehran: Social Security Research Institute; 2018. [Persian]
Agha Mohammad Aghaee E. The role of the State in the process of people's participation (a research about participatory State). Tehran: Shahre Danesh Legal Studies and Research Institute; 2013. [Persian]
Agha Mohammad Aghaee E, Khaleghparast H. An introduction to social security law (basics and policies of social welfare: From the welfare state to the post-welfare area). Tehran: Dadghostar Publication; 2021. [Persian]
Ohmae K. The End of the Nation State. London: Harper Collins; 1995.
Graham C. Safety Nets, Politics and the Poor. Washington D.C: Brookings Institute; 1994.
Mousavi MT, Mohammadi MA. Concepts and theories of social welfare. Tehran: Danjeh Publication; 2009. [Persian]
Goodman R, White G, Kwon H. The East Asian Welfare Model. London: Routledge; 1988.
Layard R. Tackling Unemployment. London: Basingstoke Macmillan. 1999.
Jessop B. The Transition to Post-Fordism and Schumpeterian Workfare State. In: Burrows R, Loader B. Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State? London: Routledge; 1994.
Poggi G. The Development of the modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press; 1978.
- Abstract Viewed: 385 times
- PDF (فارسی) Downloaded: 184 times