Analysis of the Rule of Fair Trial in Quasi-Judicial Authorities in the Light of Charter of Citizenship Rights Adopted in 2016
Akhlāq-i zīstī,
Vol. 8 No. 1 (1397),
2 November 2018
,
Page 213-227
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v8i1.32698
Abstract
Background and Aim: Justice is an inseparable feature in any trial, especially the proceedings of quasi-judicial authorities. Observance of justice for the judicial system can be observed in several sections with a guarantee of implementation: including the principles stated in the Constitution and the Charter of Civil Rights adopted in 2016, international treaties and also in jurisprudential sources. Our purpose in this article is to examine the role of the principles of fair trial in the proceedings of quasi-judicial authorities in the light of the Charter of Civil Rights.
Materials and Methods: The research method is descriptive-analytical using library resources.
Conclusion: With the involvement of the government in many matters, new relationships were formed that required a special kind of trial and information and specialized knowledge in the field related to them. On the other hand, resolving disputes arising from those relationships required speed of action and quick decision-making that was inconsistent with the nature of the public judiciary and its procedure. Therefore, authorities were created outside the system of general judicial authorities, with the titles of organization, board, dispute resolution commissions, etc. which deal with disputes arising from the implementation of special laws based on substantive and special laws.
Please cite this article as: Fardoost GH, Rajabi A, Rajabiyeh MH, Golkhandan S. Analysis of the Rule of Fair Trial in Quasi-Judicial Authorities in the Light of Charter of Citizenship Rights Adopted in 2016. Bioethics Journal, Special Issue on Citizenship Rights, Autumn 2018; 213-227.
- Trial; Fair; Charter of Civil Rights; Quasi-Judicial Authorities
How to Cite
References
Ebrahimi F. Principles of fair trial in dealing with administrative violations. Tehran: Shahr-e Danesh Legal Research Institute; 2014. p.41-39. [Persian]
Yazdi A. Human Rights and the Concept of Equality, Fairness and Justice, a group of authors. Under the supervision of Ashouri M. Tehran: Tendency Publishing; 2004. p.133. [Persian]
Fazaeli M. Fair trial in international criminal trials. Tehran: Published by the Institute of Legal Studies and Research; 2010. p.56. [Persian]
Katorian N. Philosophy of Law. Tehran: Anteshar Co.; 1989. Vol.2 p.478. [Persian]
Rahpima M. Tax proceedings in the light of the principles of fair trial. Tehran: Jangal Publishing; 2012. p.91. [Persian].
Tabatabai Motameni M. Administrative Law. Tehran: Samat Publications; 1995. p.145-147. [Persian].
Abbasi,M,Collection of Medical and Pharmaceutical Laws and Regulations, Tehran, Legal Publications, 2001, 79.
Montesquieu SH. The Spirit of Laws. Translated by Mehdi AA. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications; 2015. p.109-111. [Persian]
Katozian N. A Step towards Justice. Tehran: Tehran University Press; 1999. p.318. [Persian]
Poor Ostad M. The Origin and Challenge of the Rule of Prohibition of Reasoning. Law Quarterly 2010; 40(4): 99-119. [Persian]
Hadavand M, Aghaei Toogh M. Special Administrative Courts in the Light of the Principles and Rules of Fair Trial. Tehran: Nashr Khorsandi; 2010. p.237-240. [Persian]
Dehghani H. Time Management: Accelerating the proceedings. Journal of Legal Excellence 2011; 8(12): 13-35. [Persian]
Darvishzadeh M. A Study in Judicial Management. 1st ed. Tehran: Space; 2005. p.27. [Persian]
Wisburt D, Fred Rickson B. Fair Trial. Translated by Taha F, Ashrafi L. Tehran: Mizan Publishing; 2007. p.169-171.
Razaghi K. Judicial Standards in International Documents and the Judicial System of Iran. Kanoon Magazine 2010; 105(52): 85-117. [Persian]
Moazenzadegan HA. The Right to Litigation and Defense in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Legal Perspectives 1988; 7(9): 132-147. [Persian]
Zarrin Ghalam A. Discussion on the Court of Administrative Justice. Quarterly Journal of Legal and Judicial Studies 1987; 4(11-12): 131-147 [Persian]
Agriculture A, Bahonar SA. Law for Mama, Familiarity with the authorities in resolving and resolving administrative disputes. Tehran: Jangal Publishing; 1977. Vol.1 p.27. [Persian]
- Abstract Viewed: 233 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 78 times