مصادیق قواعد آمره حقوق بشر بینالمللی در پرتو نظام حقوق شهروندی جمهوری اسلامی ایران
Akhlāq-i zīstī i.e., Bioethics Journal,
Vol. 10 No. 1 (1399),
28 June 2020
,
Page 239-253
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v10i1.30940
Abstract
Background and Aim: In order to globalize and diminish the shadow of national sovereignty of states over human rights, all human beings (regardless of which state they are citizens of) are considered members of the international community and, as a result, enjoy different rights. In this regard, in order to design and present a set of legal standards and norms to ensure more and better human rights, the concept of fundamental human rights in the literature of international law in particular and international human rights, has emerged.
Materials and Methods: In this analytical-descriptive study, the concept of peremptory norms in international law and its effects will be discussed first. After accurately identifying this variable, we will introduce examples of peremptory norms in the field of international human rights. In the next step, the framework of citizenship rights in the Iranian legal system and examples of these rights will be identified as another variable of this research.
Ethical Considerations: In order to organize this research, while observing the authenticity of the texts, honesty and fidelity have been observed.
Findings: By accepting and ratifying the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Iranian government has incorporated the concept of fundamental human rights, which is one of the examples of the peremptory norms in international law, into its domestic legal system. In the present study, it is observed that the distinction between the concept of human rights and citizenship rights within the framework of domestic law will affect Iran's international obligations in relation to fundamental human rights.
Conclusion: On the one hand, the classification of international human rights norms and their division into two categories of fundamental and non-fundamental rights, and on the other hand, the lack of attention of the Iranian domestic legal system to this issue in some cases can cause international Responsibility for state in the field of International law and relations. As a result, the need to amend domestic laws and regulations in relation to fundamental human rights seems inevitable.
Please cite this article as: Jafari A, Rostami S, Rostami S. Examples of the Peremptory Norms of International Human Rights in the Light of the Citizenship Rights System of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Bioethics Journal, Special Issue on Bioethics and Citizenship Rights 2020; 239-253.
- Citizenship Rights; Human Rights; Fundamental Human Rights; Peremptory Normsjustice
How to Cite
References
Greiman V. Artificially Intelligent System and Human Rights: A Global Perspective. In: Payne B, Wu H, ICCWS 2020 15th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security. London: Academic Conferences and Publishing International; 2020. p.207.
Kanstroom D. Human Rights for All Is Better than Citizenship Rights for Some. In: Bauböck R. Debating Transformations of National Citizenship. IMISCOE Research Series. Cham: Springer; 2018. p.207-208.
Teo T. The Exclusions of Citizenship. In: Teo T. Civic Multiculturalism in Singapore: Revisiting Citizenship, Rights and Recognition. London: Springer; 2019. p.73-89.
Kishino H, Takahashi T. Global Citizenship Development: Effects of Study Abroad and Other Factors. Journal of International Students 2019; 9(2): 535-555.
Weatherall T. Jus Cogens: International Law and Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p.263-264.
Schutter O. International Human Rights Law: Cases, Materials, Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. p.85-87.
Beyranvand F. Jus Cogens and Erga Omnes Obligations in International Law. MA Dissertation. Tehran: Islamic Azad University; 2013. p.100. [Persian]
Ingram D. World Crisis and Underdevelopment: A Critical Theory of Poverty, Agency and Coercion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. p.293.
Beer A. Peremptory Norms of General International Law. Boston: Brill; 2019. p.83.
Heinze E, Fitzmaurice M. Landmark Cases in Public International Law. London: Kluwer; 1998. p.234.
Arechaga J. International Law in the Past Third of a Century. Hague: Sijthoff et Noordhoff; 1978. p.64.
Beyranvand F. The procedure of national courts in confronting with international soft law with emphasis on international humanitarian law. Ph.D. Dissertation. Tehran: Islamic Azad University; 2020. p.325. [Persian]
Costelloe D. Legal Consequences of Peremptory Norms in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p.193-223.
Ziegler R. Voting Rights of Refugees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p.173.
Shelton D. Sherlock Holmes and the Mystery of Jus Cogens. In: Heijer M, Wilt H. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015: Jus Cogens: Quo Vadis?. Hague: Springer; 2016. p.36.
Yaghuti E, Khazaee A, Beyranvand F. Inquiries About Jus Cogens and Erga Omnes Obligations in International Law. Tehran: Islamic Azad University of Central Tehran Publisher; 2019. p.35-36. [Persian]
Mansour A, Menard M, Thouvenin J, Lesaffre H, Szurek S, Heathcote S. Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the ILC Articles on State Responsibility. In: Crawford J, Pellet A, Olleson S. The Law of International Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p.452.
Weatherall T. Jus Cogens: International Law and Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p.201.
Kolb A. The UN Security Council Members' Responsibility to Protect: A Legal Analysis. Berlin: Springer; 2017. p.338.
Desierto D. Necessity and National Emergency Clauses. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff; 2012. p.310.
Ersson S, Lane E. Democracy: A Comparative Approach. Hague: Routledge; 2013. p.14-15.
Magliocca G. The Heart of the Constitution: How the Bill of Rights Became the Bill of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. p.1-5.
Elsan M. Citizenship rights from the perspective of global citizenship theory. Human Rights 2008; 11(2): 27-42.
Poorezat A. The logical model of the Charter of Civil Rights based on a comparative review of existing documents. Social Welfare Quarterly 2007; 14(26): 12-28.
Mohsen T. Critique of the position of citizenship rights in the Iranian legal system with a look at the Charter of Citizenship Rights. Orumieh: National Conference on Civil Rights; 2016. p.8-9.
Schutter O. International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. p.642, 731.
Tabatabaee M. Citizenship rights with emphasis on the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. First Line Quarterly 2009; 10(8): 24-36.
Palmer V, Mattar M. Mixed Legal Systems, East and West. Hague: Routledge; 2016. p.210-211.
Novak A. Transnational Human Rights Litigation. London: Springer; 2020. p.93-95.
Bantekas I, Oette L. International Human Rights Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020. p.356-358.
Akhondi M. Aeene Dadresiye Keyfari. Tehran: Sazemane Chap va Entesharate Vezarate Farhang va Ershade Eslami; 1989. p.22, 142.
Shirkhani P. Execution of persons under the age of eighteen in the Islamic Penal Code. Khorramabad: First National Conference on Futurology, Humanities and Social Security; 2016.
Peleg N, Tobin J. The Right to Life, Survival and Development. In: Tobin J. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. p.208-209.
Poorbaferani H, Rahimi R. A comparative study of the crime of torture in Iranian law and the Convention against Torture. Legal Journal of Justice 2016; 14(93): 37-60.
Wheatley S. The Idea of International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. p.155-156.
Oliyaeefard M. Prohibition of slavery and servitude in international instruments and Iranian law. Our rights 2017; 17(52): 87-99.
Schutter O. International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. P.608.
Tshosa O. National Law and International Human Rights Law: Cases of Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2017. p.228-229.
Katuziyan N. Law generalities. Tehran: Publishing Joint Stock Company; 2000. p.392.
Abassi B. Human rights and fundamental freedoms. Tehran: Dadgostar; 2011. p.245.
Shahbagh A. Sharhe Ghanoone Madani. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh; 1997. Vol.1 p.4-5.
Morna C, Rama K, Chigorimbo S. SADC Gender Protocol 2019 Barometer. Pretoria: African Books Collective; 2019. p.241-242.
Flynn E. Disabled Justice? Access to Justice and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing; 2015. p.24-25.
Hashemi M, Hoghooghe Bashar va Azadihaye Asasi. Tehran: Bonyade Hoghooghiye Mizan; 2018. Pp. 205-207, 595-597, 604-609.
Rochow N, Immortal Beings without Soul or Conscience: Toward a Corporate and an AI Ethic. In: Babie P, Sarre R, Religion Matters: The Contemporary Relevance of Religion. London: Springer; 2020. Pp. 15-17.
- Abstract Viewed: 819 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 230 times