The Performance of a Spray Tower in Scrubbing H2S from Air
Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention),
Vol. 2 No. 4 (2014),
28 June 2015
,
Page 321-328
https://doi.org/10.22037/meipm.v2i4.8400
Abstract
Background and Objective: Hydrogen sulfide is a hazardous gas which is fatal at high concentrations. The application of a spray tower to remove H2S from air is the simplest and cheapest method but its performance is under question. In this study, the performance of a spray tower in removing H2S from air as well as its pressure loss across the bed were investigated.
Material and Methods: In this study a spray tower was used to remove H2S from air. H2S was injected to the tower at the range of 0-30 ppm. The volumetric flow rate of water as the scrubbing liquid was 2 lit/min and spraying was carried out by a pump with 21-35 Kg/cm2 head. The volumetric flow rate of air was supplied through a fan in the range of 2400-3000 lit/min. The pressure loss across the bed was monitored by an inclined manometer. H2S concentrations in air were measured using direct reading device. The results were analyzed using SPSS version 16.
Results: The minimum pressure loss, 73.81±0.2887 Pa, was obtained at 1200 lit/min air flow rate without scrubbing liquid injected to the tower. The maximum pressure loss, 292.84±2.448 Pa, was experienced at 3000 lit/min air flow rate with 2 lit/min of water flow injected to the tower. The maximum removal efficiency, 70.53±1.5415%, was experienced at 1800 lit/min of air flow rate along with 15 ppm of H2S injected to the tower. Minimum removal efficiency, 47.74±0.9295%, was gained at 3000 lit/min of air flow rate and 30 ppm of H2S injected to the tower. Statistical t-test revealed that there is a significant difference between H2S removal efficiency with air flow rate and inlet concentration, also between pressure drop with air flow rate and the presence of water (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The removal efficiency of spray tower decreases by increasing the input flow rate and input concentration of H2S. The performance of water as a scrubbing liquid in spray tower is not satisfactory thus, the application of water plus chemical scrubbing liquids is strongly recommended to be studied.
How to cite this article: Jafari MJ, Nourian S, Zendehdel R, Massoudinejad MR, Sarbakhsh P, Rahmati AR, Mofidi AA. The performance of a spray tower in scrubbing H2S from air. Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention).2015; 2(4):321-328.
- spray tower
- Hydrogen sulfide
- pressure drop
- removal efficiency
How to Cite
References
Schifftner KC. Air pollution control equipment selection guide. CRC press company; 2002.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological profile for hydrogen sulfide. 2006
Norman WS. Absorption, distillation and cooling towers. New York: Jhon wiley & sons Inc; 1962.
Environmental protection agency(EPA). Lesson 5: wet-film (packed tower) scrubbers. U. S. Environmental Protectin Agency; 1998.
Ullman JL, Mukhtar S, Lacey RE, Carey JB. A review of literature concerning odors , ammonia , and dust from broiler production facilities : 4 . remedial management practices. Journal of Applied ploutry Research. 2004;13(3):521–31.
Anti SB, Artuz RJ, . Biofiltration of air. 2004; Available from: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/chem-eng/Biotech-Environ/MISC/biofilt/biofiltration.htm.
Javed KH, Mahmud T, Purba E. Enhancement of mass transfer in a spray tower. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2006;84(A6):465–77.
Davis DS. Accidental releases of air toxics: prevention, control, and mitigation. 1 ed: Noyes Publications; 1990.
Qing Z, Yincheng G, Zhenqi N. Experimental studies on removal capacity of carbon dioxide by a packed reactor and a spray column using aqueous ammonia. Energy Procedia. 2011;4:519-24.
Bandyopadhyay A, Biswas MN. Critical flow atomizer in SO 2 spray scrubbing. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2008;139:29–41.
Turpin A, Couvert A, Laplanche A, Paillier A. Experimental study of mass transfer and H 2 S removal efficiency in a spray tower. Chemical Engineering and Processing. 2008;47(5):886–92.
Theodore L. Air pollution control equipment calculations. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
Jafari MJ. Industrial ventilation. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; Fadak Isatis2010.
- Abstract Viewed: 619 times
- PDF Downloaded: 195 times