دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention)

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Editorial Team
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Journal Policies
    • Article Processing Charge (APC)
    • Privacy Statement
    • Archiving
    • Open Access
  • Guidelines
    • for Authors
    • Authorship Criteria
    • Declaration
    • for Reviewers
  • Publication Ethics
  • Conference Proceedings
    • The 13th Student Scientific Conference of Innovation Health Sciences
    • The 9th Iranian Congress of Epidemiology
    • The fourth international conference and the fifth conference biennial Ergonomics of Iran
  • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 10 No. 2 (1401)
  4. Original article

Vol. 10 No. 2 (1401)

September 2022

Noise Control Measures Prioritization and Job Groups Identification Exposed to Hearing Impairments to Implement a Hearing Conservation Program in the Azar Oil Field

  • Ali Askari
  • Arash Sepahvand
  • Masoud Davoodi
  • Farhad Mokhtari
  • Ali Salehi-Sahlabadi

Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention), Vol. 10 No. 2 (1401), 5 September 2022 , Page 187 - 176
https://doi.org/10.22037/iipm.v10i2.37886 Published: 2022-11-19

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Background and Aim: Noise is the industry's most common occupational harmful factor. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify and prioritize occupational groups exposed to noise in an oil field.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was started in the winter of 2021 by examining the job description of employees and performing dosimetry using the CEL-360 device. The sound pressure level distribution was measured using the Casella CEL device and based on ISO 9612-2009 (E). Using Surfer 21 and AutoCAD 2020 software, an isotonic map was prepared, and priority occupational groups and primary noise sources were identified using Noise Control Priority Index (NCPI). In stations with more than 85 dB sound pressure levels, noise frequency analysis was performed, and in the last stage, appropriate corrective action was presented according to the production process.

Results: The findings of this study showed that 16% of the area has the priority for control measures in the danger area, and 23.56% is located in the precautionary area. Operations were identified among the occupational groups with the highest NCPI score (1.5) to be prioritized in the hearing protection program.

Conclusion: The present study results show that the combined sound pressure level, duration, and the number of exposed people can provide a suitable model for prioritizing voice control and identifying occupational groups in need of care in the hearing protection program.

 Please cite this article as:

Askari A, Sepahvand A, Davoodi M, Mokhtari F, Salehi-Sahlabadi A. Noise Control Measures Prioritization and Job Groups Identification Exposed to Hearing Impairments to Implement a Hearing Conservation Program in the Azar Oil Field. Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat. 2022;10(2): 176-87. doi: 10.22037/iipm.v10i2.37886

Keywords:
  • Oil industry, NCPI, Noise pollution, Noise control, Physical harmful factors
  • pdf8 (فارسی)

How to Cite

1.
Askari A, Sepahvand A, Davoodi M, Mokhtari F, Salehi-Sahlabadi A. Noise Control Measures Prioritization and Job Groups Identification Exposed to Hearing Impairments to Implement a Hearing Conservation Program in the Azar Oil Field. Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat [Internet]. 2022 Nov. 19 [cited 2026 Oct. 15];10(2):187-76. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/spip/article/view/37886
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

References

ASKARI A, Golmohammadi R, Alinia A, Honairi Haghighi A. Study of the impact of acoustic barrier on generator building noise reduction; case study: north Azadegan oilfield. Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering.43-50.

Kaliakatsos D, Mirabelli G, Pizzuti T. Noise risk assessment in the workplace: The case of a waste selection plant. Noise & Vibration Worldwide. 2015;46(5):8-17.

Sravani PAPM, Sowmya MAKP, Manasa PNSG. Noise Pollution and Its Impact on Human Health and Social Behavior using Systems Approach-A Case Study in Kurnool City. order. 2016;8(7).

Monazzam Esmaielpour MR, Laal F, Majlessi F, Fallah Madvari R, Rahimi Foroushani A, Fallah Madvari A. Investigating the effect of increasing duration time of using the protective device on hearing loss among tile industry workers: Application of the BASNEF education model. Health and Safety at Work. 2017;7(4):319-28.

Bahramzadeh A, Monazami -Tehrani G, Nateghinia S, Akbari Dilmaghani N. Evaluation of Noise, Light and Burnout in the Intensive Care unit of Neurosurgery, Loghman Hakim Hospital. Irtiqā-yi īminī va pīshgīrī az maṣdūmiyat/ha. 2021;9(3):189 - 3.

Tak S, Davis RR, Calvert GM. Exposure to hazardous workplace noise and use of hearing protection devices among US workers—NHANES, 1999–2004. American journal of industrial medicine. 2009;52(5):358-71.

Gomes J, Lloyd O, Norman N. The health of the workers in a rapidly developing country: effects of occupational exposure to noise and heat. Occupational medicine. 2002;52(3):121-8.

Danaei G, Farzadfar F, Kelishadi R, Rashidian A, Rouhani OM, Ahmadnia S, et al. Iran in transition. The Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1984-2005.

Münzel T, Schmidt FP, Steven S, Herzog J, Daiber A, Sørensen M. Environmental noise and the cardiovascular system. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2018;71(6):688-97.

Forouharmajd F, Nassiri P, Monazzam MR. Noise pollution of air compressor and its noise reduction procedures by using an enclosure. International Journal of Environmental Health Engineering. 2012;1(1):20.

Zare M, Nasiri P, Shahtaheri S, Golbabaei F, Aghamolaei T. Noise pollution and hearing loss in one of the oil industries. Hormozgan Medical Journal. 2007;11(2):121-6.

Valentin O, John SM, Laville F. Using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector attenuation. Noise & Health. 2017;19(86):1.

Madvari RF, Dehghan SF, Bidel H, Laal F, Halvani G, Kordmiri HM, et al. Relationship Between Noise Annoyance and Job Burnout Among Exposed Worker to Noise Pollution: A Case Study in Ceramic Industry. Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2019;7(3).

Babamiri M, Moatamedzadeh M, Golmohammadi R, Farhadian M, Derakhshan J. The Role of individual susceptibility to the effects of low frequency noise on cognitive Performances. Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2018;6(4).

Golmohammadi R, Moazaz F, Aliabadi M. The noise control prioritizing index in a tire manufacturing company. Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering. 2017;4(3):41-8.

Askari A, Abadi ASS, Alinia A, Pourjaafar M, Haghighi AH, Pirposhteh EA. Prioritizing and Providing Sound Pollution Control Strategies at the CPF of North Azadegan Oilfield Project.

Yeend I, Beach EF, Sharma M. Working memory and extended high-frequency hearing in adults: Diagnostic predictors of speech-in-noise perception. Ear and Hearing. 2019;40(3):458-67.

Ghanbari M, Yartire H, Ashtarian H, Salimi K, Pourman D, Mostafaei L. A study of sound pressure level, frequency analysis and sound spectrum levels calculation in crepnaz factories of kermanshah city (2014). 2015.

Golmohammadi R, Aliabadi M, Azimi N. Designing an Enclosure in Order to Control the Equipment Noise in Screw Manufacturing Industry. Journal of Health. 2019;10(1):83-95.

Pimenta AdS, Teixeira CF, Silva VMd, Almeida BdGPd, Lima MLLTd. Logical operating model of the hearing conservation program for workers. Revista CEFAC. 2019;21.

Rabinowitz P, Cantley LF, Galusha D, Trufan S, Swersey A, Dixon-Ernst C, et al. Assessing hearing conservation program effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2018;60(1):29-35.

Muhr P, Johnson A-C, Skoog B, Rosenhall U. A demonstrated positive effect of a hearing conservation program in the Swedish armed forces. International Journal of Audiology. 2016;55(3):168-72.

Muhr P, Rosenhall U. The influence of military service on auditory health and the efficacy of a Hearing Conservation Program. Noise and Health. 2011;13(53):320.

Prince MM, Colligan MJ, Stephenson CM, Bischoff B. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness. Journal of safety research. 2004;35(1):91-106.

Hassanvand D, Zare S, Ghotbi-Ravandi MR. Noise assessment and sound map projection using Surfer and Noise At Work tools in a tire manufacturing complex in Iran, 2018. Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology. 2019;8(2):109-17.

Royster LH. IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ANDCHARACTERISTICS OF HEARINGCONSERVATION PROGRAMS ANDDETERMINATION OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS Environment International. 1990;16:339-52.

Royster LH, Royster JD, Cecich TF. An evaluation of the effectiveness of three hearing protection devices at an industrial facility with a TWA of 107 dB. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1984;76(2):485-97.

Arezes PM, Miguel AS. Assessing the use of hearing protection in industrial settings: A comparison between methods. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2013;43(6):518-25.

  • Abstract Viewed: 487 times
  • pdf8 (فارسی) Downloaded: 263 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Language

  • فارسی
  • English

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Creative Commons License

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 4.0.

ISSN-Online: 2383-1901| ISSN-Print: 2345-2455

                      https://goo.gl/maps/Q5TCJTUWtv7nqhe1A

Powered by OJSPlus