دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention)

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Issue
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Publication Ethics
  • Declaration
  • Training Course
    • Reviewers Checklists for Evaluating Scientific Manuscripts
  • Learning
  • Conference Proceedings
    • The 13th Student Scientific Conference of Innovation Health Sciences
    • The 9th Iranian Congress of Epidemiology
    • The fourth international conference and the fifth conference biennial Ergonomics of Iran
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018)
  4. Original article

Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018)

May 2019

Evaluation of Consequence Modeling of Fire and Explosion on Methane Storage Tanks in a CNG refueling Station

  • Mohsen Sadeghi Yarandi
  • Ali Karimi

Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention), Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018), 14 May 2019 , Page 246 - 237
https://doi.org/10.22037/meipm.v6i4.26009 Published: 2019-06-17

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Background and Objective:One of the most fuel materials that recently considered is compressed natural gas (CNG). Despite all the known benefits, storage, transportation and use of compressed natural gas as a fuel have risks such as explosions and fires. This study was aimed towards Consequence Modeling of Fire and Explosion on Methane Storage Tanks in a CNG refueling Station.

Materials and Methods: In this study, A CNG station was evaluated. Considering the results of the visit the CNG station, survey of the recent studies and events and review of experts' opinions, four scenarios of discharges, catastrophic rupture, jet fire and explosions in compressed natural gas storage tanks were evaluated. Then each of these scenarios by using the software is modeled and Possible Consequences of each scenario were evaluated. In order to Consequence Modeling and examine the outcome of Consequences in this study, the PHAST software version 6.7 was used.

Results: In this study two jet fire and explosion scenarios of storage tanks were selected as the worst case scenarios. In jet fire scenario the maximum area affected by fire is 135/13 square meters in the leakage dimension of 150 millimeters. The results of CNG storages explosion modeling also showed that at a distance of 20 meters from storage tanks, the explosion pressure increase is 1 bar (The probability of death in this pressure is 100%) and gradually decrease by increase the distance from the storage tanks, as far as the distance of 400 meters, it reaches at 0.01 bar that is a safe area. It was also found, in the radius 52, 69 and 232 meters of the storage tanks there were 0.21, 0.14 and 0.02 bar increasing pressure, respectively.

Conclusion: The results of present study showed that leakage and damage of the storage tanks, can lead to deadly accidents, Particular in dual-purpose refueling stations (CNG and Gasoline). So according to the results of this study, increasing the number of this refueling stations in recent years, corrective actions in order to increasing the safety levels in methane gas storage tanks in CNG refueling Station is essential.

How to cite this article: Sadeghi Yarandi M, Karimi A. Evaluation of Consequence Modeling of Fire and Explosion on Methane Storage Tanks in a CNG refueling Station. Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention). 2018; 6(4): 237-246.

Keywords:
  • Consequence Modeling, Fire, Compressed Natural Gas, PHAST Software
  • PDF (فارسی)

How to Cite

1.
Sadeghi Yarandi M, Karimi A. Evaluation of Consequence Modeling of Fire and Explosion on Methane Storage Tanks in a CNG refueling Station. Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat [Internet]. 2019 Jun. 17 [cited 2026 Jul. 25];6(4):246-37. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/spip/article/view/26009
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Mousavi J, Parvini M. Analyzing effective factors on leakage-induced hydrogen fires. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2016;40:29-42. [Scopus]

Haghnazarloo H, Parvini M, Lotfollahi MN. Consequence modeling of a real rupture of toluene storage tank. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2015;37:11-8. [Scopus]

Kamaei M, Alizadeh SSA, Keshvari A, Kheyrkhah Z, Moshashaei P. Risk assessment and consequence modeling of BLEVE explosion wave phenomenon of LPG spherical tank in a refinery. Health and Safety at Work. 2016;6(2):10-24.

Kagiri C, Zhang L, Xia X. Optimization of a compressed natural gas station operation to minimize energy cost. Energy Procedia. 2017;142:2003-8. [Scopus]

Ally J, Pryor T. Life-cycle assessment of diesel, natural gas and hydrogen fuel cell bus transportation systems. Journal of Power Sources. 2007;170(2):401-11. [Scopus]

Mac Kinnon MA, Brouwer J, Samuelsen S. The role of natural gas and its infrastructure in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, improving regional air quality, and renewable resource integration. Progress in Energy and Combustion science. 2018;64:62-92. [Scopus]

Rubel RI. Natural Gas Driven Vehicles Safety and Regulatory Regime-Challenges in Bangladesh. Journal of Materials and Engineering Structures «JMES». 2017;4(3):113-20.

Sehgal A, Saxena M, Pandey S, Malhotra R. Improving Performance of Compressed Natural Gas Fueled Passenger Car Engine by Addition of Hydrogen. 2018.

Khan MI, Yasmin T, Shakoor A. Technical overview of compressed natural gas (CNG) as a transportation fuel. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;51:785-97.

Vinnem JE. On the development of failure models for hydrocarbon leaks during maintenance work in process plants on offshore petroleum installations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2013;113:112-21. [Scopus]

Mohammadfam I, Zarei E. Safety risk modeling and major accidents analysis of hydrogen and natural gas releases: A comprehensive risk analysis framework. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40(39):13653-63. [Scopus]

Dadgar P, Tehrani GM, Borgheipour H. Identification and Assessment of Human Error in CNG Stations with SHERPA Technique. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2017.

Badri N, Nourai F, Rashtchian D. The role of quantitative risk assessment in improving hazardous installations siting: a case study. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (IJCCE). 2011;30(4):113-9. [Scopus]

Parvini M, Kordrostami A. Consequence modeling of explosion at Azad-Shahr CNG refueling station. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2014;30:47-54. [Scopus]

Kagiri C, Zhang L, Xia X, editors. Compressor and priority panel optimization for an energy efficient CNG fuelling station. Control Conference (ASCC), 2017 11th Asian; 2017: IEEE.

Saadat-Targhi M, Khadem J, Farzaneh-Gord M. Thermodynamic analysis of a CNG refueling station considering the reciprocating compressor. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2016;29:453-61. [Scopus]

Jafari M, Zarei E, Dormohammadi A. Presentation of a method for consequence modeling and quantitative risk assessment of fire and explosion in process industry (Case study: Hydrogen Production Process). Health and Safety at Work. 2013;3(1):55-68.

Koller G, Fischer U, Hungerbühler K. Assessing safety, health, and environmental impact early during process development. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2000;39(4):960-72. [Scopus]

Beheshti MH, Hajizadeh R, Mehri A, Borhani Jebeli M. Modeling the result of hexane leakage from storage tanks and planning a emergency response programm in a petrochemical complex. Iran Occupational Health. 2016;13(1):69-79. [Scopus]

Dan S, Lee CJ, Park J, Shin D, Yoon ES. Quantitative risk analysis of fire and explosion on the top-side LNG-liquefaction process of LNG-FPSO. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2014;92(5):430-41. [Scopus]

Khan MI, Yasmin T, Khan NB. Safety issues associated with the use and operation of natural gas vehicles: learning from accidents in Pakistan. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2016;38(8):2481-97. [Scopus]

Selvan RT, Siddqui NA. Risk Assessment of Natural Gas Gathering Station & Pipeline Network. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. 2017;12(2):227-42.

Assari MJ, Kalatpour O, Zarei E, Mohammadfam I. Consequence modeling of fire on Methane storage tanks in a gas refinery. Journal of Occupational Hygiene Engineering. 2016;3(1):51-9.

Zarei E, Jafari MJ, Badri N. Risk assessment of vapor cloud explosions in a hydrogen production facility with consequence modeling. Journal of research in health sciences. 2013;13(2):181-7. [Scopus]

Kariznovi H, AsgharFarshad A, Yarahmadi R, Khosravi Y, Yari P. Consequence analysis of fire and explosion of a cylindrical LPG tanks in an oil and gas industry. Iran Occupational Health. 2017;14(3):37-45. [Scopus]

Dadashzadeh M, Khan F, Hawboldt K, Amyotte P. An integrated approach for fire and explosion consequence modelling. Fire Safety Journal. 2013;61:324-37. [Scopus]

Yang JM, Ko BS, Park C, Yoo B, Shin D, Ko JW. Design and implementation of an integrated safety management system for compressed natural gas stations using ubiquitous sensor network. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2014;31(3):393-401. [Scopus]

Goulding D, Fitzpatrick D, O’Connor R, Browne J, Power N. Introducing gaseous transport fuel to Ireland: A strategic infrastructure framework. Renewable Energy. 2019. [Scopus]

Meysami H, Ebadi T, Zohdirad H, Minepur M. Worst-case identification of gas dispersion for gas detector mapping using dispersion modeling. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2013;26(6):1407-14. [Scopus]

  • Abstract Viewed: 1097 times
  • PDF (فارسی) Downloaded: 556 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Language

  • فارسی
  • English

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Creative Commons License

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 4.0.

ISSN-Online: 2383-1901| ISSN-Print: 2345-2455

                      https://goo.gl/maps/Q5TCJTUWtv7nqhe1A

Powered by OJSPlus