Dynamic Process Accident Analysis: Comparison of Bow tie and Bayesian Network Models
Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention),
Vol. 5 No. 4 (2017),
13 March 2018
,
Page 212 - 201
https://doi.org/10.22037/meipm.v5i4.20727
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Accidents of the industrial processes have caused irreparable economic, social, environmental and even political loses in the country. To prevent such accidents, identifying, evaluating and analyzing the causes of these incidents with new approaches are required for designing preventive strategies is a necessity. Therefore, the objective of the present study was directed toward the identifying and dynamic analyzing of the root causes of the process accidents. The Bowtie (BT) model and Bayesian Network (BN) were implemented for analyzing the accidents.
Materials and Methods: First, the accidents' scenarios were modelled quantitatively and quantitatively using the BT model, and then, the cause-consequence model of the accident scenarios was modelled in the BN using the proposed algorithm. Capabilities of the BN including, deductive, abductive reasoning and updated probability was used for dynamic analysis of the accident scenarios.
Results: The results showed that deductive reasoning for estimating the occurrence probabilities of a scenario and its consequences is more accurate by BN than BT. BN model is capable of doing probability updating of root events using the precursor accident data through abductive reasoning, taking into account conditional dependency among root events, safety barriers and modelling of common cause’s failures. However, BT model does not have such capabilities.
Conclusion: In the present study, a novel, dynamic and quantitative model was introduced that allows the continuous identification and monitoring of the safety risks in the process industries. Implementing the proposed model in the process industries can significantly reduce the risk of the industrial accidents and improve the level of safety.
How to cite this article: Zarei E, Mohammadfam I, Azadeh A, Mirzaei-Aliabadi M. Dynamic Process Accident Analysis: Comparison of Bow tie and Bayesian Network Models. Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention). 2017; 5(4):201-212 .
- Dynamic, Accident, Analysis; Process Industry, Modeling; Bayesian network; Bow tie; Process.
How to Cite
References
Khan FI, Abbasi SA. Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 1998;11(4):261–77[Scopus].
Jahangiri M, Nourozi M sarebanzadeh k. Risk Managment, Part 2. Tehran: Fanavaran Press; 2013.
Zarei E. Dynamic quantitative risk modeling using fuzzy logic and Bayesian network on process industries. Ph.D Thesis,Hamadan University of Medical Sciences; 2017.
Jafari MJ, Zarei E, Dormohammadi A. Presentation of a method for consequence modeling and quantitative risk assessment of fire and explosion in process industry (Case study: Hydrogen Production Process). J Heal Saf Work. 2013;3(1):55–68.
Gowland R. The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS)/layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: A step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment? J Hazard Mater. 2006;130(3):307–10[Pub Med].
Delvosalle C, Fievez C, Pipart A, Debray B. ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries. J Hazard Mater. 2006;130(3):200–19[Pub Med].
De Dianous V, Fiévez C. ARAMIS project: A more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow–tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. J Hazard Mater. 2006;130(3):220–33[Pub Med].
Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2012;104:36–44.
Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2013;91(1–2):46–53[Scopus].
Zarei E, Azadeh A, Aliabadi MM, Mohammadfam I. Dynamic Safety Risk Modeling of Process Systems Using Bayesian Network. Process Saf Prog. 2017;36(4):399–407[Scopus].
Badreddine A, Ben Amor N, editors. A dynamic barriers implementation in Bayesian-based bow tie diagrams for risk analysis. 2010 ACS/IEEE International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications, AICCSA; 2010[Scopus].
Zarei E, Azadeh A, Khakzad N, Mirzaei Aliabadi M, Mohammadfam I. Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network. J Hazard Mater. 2017;321:830–40[Pub Med].
Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: A Bayesian approach. Saf Sci. 2013;57:108–17[Scopus].
Ferdous R, Khan F, Sadiq R, Amyotte P, Veitch B. Fault and event tree analyses for process systems risk analysis: uncertainty handling formulations. Risk Anal. 2011;31(1):86–107[Pub Med].
Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Safety analysis in process facilities: Comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2011;96(8):925–32[Scopus].
Kalantarnia M, Khan F, Hawboldt K. Dynamic risk assessment using failure assessment and Bayesian theory. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2009;22(5):600–6[Scopus].
Abimbola M, Khan F, Khakzad N. Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2014;30:74–85[Scopus].
Abbassi R, Khan F, Garaniya V, Chai S, Chin C, Hossain KA. An integrated method for human error probability assessment during the maintenance of offshore facilities. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2015;94:172–9[Scopus].
Nielsen TD, Jensen FV. Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Second. New York, USA: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
Kjaerulff UB, Madsen AL. Bayesian networks and influence diagrams. Springer Sci Bus Media. 2008;200:114.
Ozog H. Hazard identification, analysis and control. Chem. Eng. (NY);( United States). 1985; 92(4).
OREDA Offshore reliability data handbook. DNV, Trondheim, Norway. 2002.
Freeman RA. CCPS guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis. Process Safety Progress. 1990; 9(4):231-5.
Zarei E, Mohammadfam I, Aliabadi MM, Jamshidi A, Ghasemi F. Efficiency prediction of control room operators based on human reliability analysis and dynamic decision-making style in the process industry. Process Saf Prog. 2016;35(2):192-9[Scopus].
- Abstract Viewed: 531 times
- PDF (فارسی) Downloaded: 326 times