دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention)

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Issue
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Publication Ethics
  • Declaration
  • Training Course
    • Reviewers Checklists for Evaluating Scientific Manuscripts
  • Learning
  • Conference Proceedings
    • The 13th Student Scientific Conference of Innovation Health Sciences
    • The 9th Iranian Congress of Epidemiology
    • The fourth international conference and the fifth conference biennial Ergonomics of Iran
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017)
  4. Original article

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017)

Dey 2018

Investigating Human and Organizational Variables as Predictors of Work Situation Awareness among Operational Workers’ of ParsKhodro Automobile Company

  • Fariba Kiani
  • Ahmad Borjali

Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention), Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017), 14 Dey 2018 , Page 168 - 157
https://doi.org/10.22037/meipm.v5i3.19837 Published: 2018-01-14

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Background and Objective:This study was carried to assess the human and organizational factors as predictors of work situation awareness among workers of Parskhodro Automobile Company. It was assumed that human factors (fatigue, sleepiness, job stress, fatalism, personality characteristics and cognitive failures) and organizational variables (job overload, safety climate and interpersonal conflict at work) as predictors variables can separate workers with low and high work situation awareness of each other.

Materials and Methods: This research is a cross-sectional study. 154 workers using a stratified random sampling method were selected among all operational staff working in the Parskhodro Automobile Company in 2015. At first, participants using the scale of work situation awareness were divided into the two groups (workers with low and high work situation awareness). Then, each group was measured with other questionnaires. In this study analyzed the data of discriminate analysis and to validate the scales of confirmatory factor analysis and Pearson correlation.

Results: The findings of discriminate equation confirmed research hypothesis. In other words, can predict work situation awareness among workers by human and organizational variables. Also, research results showed the importance of sleepiness, job stress, personality traits (neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness), cognitive impairment and safety climate as predictors of work situation awareness.

Conclusion: Considering the importance of human and organizational variables in predicting the work situation awareness, it is suggested to these variables in selecting and training of workers for employing in high-risk and operational to be emphasized.

How to cite this article: Kiani F, Borjali A, Farahbakhsh K, Farrokhi N. Investigating Human and Organizational Variables as Predictors of Work Situation Awareness among Operational Workers’ of  ParsKhodro Automobile Company. Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention). 2017; 5(3):157-168.

Keywords:
  • Human resources; Organizational structure; Situation Awareness
  • PDF (فارسی)

How to Cite

1.
Kiani F, Borjali A. Investigating Human and Organizational Variables as Predictors of Work Situation Awareness among Operational Workers’ of ParsKhodro Automobile Company. Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat [Internet]. 2018 Jan. 14 [cited 2026 Jul. 25];5(3):168-57. Available from: https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/spip/article/view/19837
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Kramer DM, Holness DL, Haynes E, McMillan K, Berriault C, Kalenge S, et al. From awareness to action: Sudbury, mining and occupational disease in a time of change. Work. 2017(Preprint):1-14.

Endsley MR, editor. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 1988 NAECON 1988, Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National; 1988: IEEE.

Jones DG, Endsley MR. Can real-time probes provide a valid measure of situation awareness. Proceedings of the Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation: User-Centered Design for the New Millennium, Savannah, GA. 2000.

Sneddon A, Mearns K, Flin R. Stress, fatigue, situation awareness and safety in offshore drilling crews. Safety Science. 2013;56:80-8.

Spencer M, Robertson K, Folkard S. The development of a fatigue/risk index for shiftworkers. Health and Safety Executive Report. 2006;446.

Michielsen HJ, De Vries J, Van Heck GL. Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: The Fatigue Assessment Scale. Journal of psychosomatic research. 2003;54(4):345-52.

Thompson J, Stevenson M. Associations between heavy-vehicle driver compensation methods, fatigue-related driving behavior, and sleepiness. Traffic injury prevention. 2014;15(sup1):S10-S4.

Rosekind MR, Gander PH, Miller DL, Gregory KB, Smith RM, Weldon KJ, et al. Fatigue in operational settings: examples from the aviation environment. Human factors. 1994;36(2):327-38.

Hancock PA, Szalma JL. Performance under stress: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.; 2008.

Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Utility, probability, and human decision making: Springer; 1975. p. 141-62.

Dobson A, Brown W, Ball J, Powers J, McFadden M. Women drivers’ behaviour, socio-demographic characteristics and accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 1999;31(5):525-35.

Williamson AM, Feyer A-M, Cairns D, Biancotti D. The development of a measure of safety climate: the role of safety perceptions and attitudes. Safety Science. 1997;25(1):15-27.

Türküm AS. Are fatalism and optimism an obstacle to developing self-protecting behaviors? Study with a Turkish sample. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 2006;34(1):51-8.

Tao D, Zhang R, Qu X. The role of personality traits and driving experience in self-reported risky driving behaviors and accident risk among Chinese drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2017;99:228-35.

Saus E-R, Johnsen BH, Eid J, Thayer JF. Who benefits from simulator training: Personality and heart rate variability in relation to situation awareness during navigation training. Computers in Human Behavior. 2012;28(4):1262-8.

Arthur W, Graziano WG. The five-factor model, conscientiousness, and driving accident involvement. Journal of personality. 1996;64(3):593-618.

Hansen CP. A causal model of the relationship among accidents, biodata, personality, and cognitive factors. Journal of applied psychology. 1989;74(1):81.

Burke J, Murphy R, editors. Human-robot interaction in USAR technical search: Two heads are better than one. Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2004 ROMAN 2004 13th IEEE International Workshop on; 2004: IEEE.

Gonzalez C, Wimisberg J. Situation awareness in dynamic decision making: Effects of practice and working memory. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 2007;1(1):56-74.

Manly T, Robertson IH, Galloway M, Hawkins K. The absent mind:: further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37(6):661-70.

Flin RH, Slaven G. Managing the offshore installation workforce: PennWell Pub.; 1996.

Beehr TA, Walsh JT, Taber TD. Relationships of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of applied psychology. 1976;61(1):41.

Kinnunen-Amoroso M, Liira J. Work-related stress management between workplace and occupational health care. Work. 2016;54(3):507-15.

Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of occupational health psychology. 2000;5(3):347.

Brown R, Holmes H. The use of a factor-analytic procedure for assessing the validity of an employee safety climate model. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 1986;18(6):455-70.

Spector PE, Jex SM. Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organizational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory. Educational Publishing Foundation; 1998.

Frahani H OH, editor. Advanced methods in human sciences. Isfahan: University Jehad publications; 2005.

Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement. 1970;30(3):607-10.

Sneddon A MK, Flin R. Situation awareness and safety in offshore drill crews. Cognition, Technology & Work. 2006;8(4):255-67.

Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, et al. Development of a fatigue scale. Journal of psychosomatic research. 1993;37(2):147-53.

Canani S, John A, Raymundi M, Schönwald S, Barreto SM. Prevalence of sleepiness in a group of Brazilian lorry drivers. Public health. 2005;119(10):925-9.

Jones JW, Wuebker LJ. Safety locus of control and employees’ accidents. Journal of Business and Psychology. 1993;7(4):449-57.

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24. 1983.

Araas TE. Associations of mindfulness, perceived stress, and health behaviors in college freshmen: Arizona State University; 2008.

Munteanu MR. Safety attitudes in the Ontario construction: University of Toronto; 2005.

Costa PT, MacCrae RR. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual: Psychological Assessment Resources, Incorporated; 1992.

Ziapour A, Kianipour N. A study of the relationship between characteristic traits and Employee Engagement (A case study of nurses across Kermanshah, Iran in 2015). Journal of medicine and life. 2015;8(Spec Iss 3):134.

Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, Parkes KR. The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British journal of clinical psychology. 1982;21(1):1-16.

Hayes BE, Perander J, Smecko T, Trask J. Measuring perceptions of workplace safety: Development and validation of the work safety scale. Journal of Safety research. 1998;29(3):145-61.

Bougard C, Davenne D, Espie S, Moussay S, Léger D. Sleepiness, attention and risk of accidents in powered two-wheelers. Sleep medicine reviews. 2016;25:40-51.

Gyekye SA. Causal attributions of Ghanaian industrial workers for accident occurrence: Miners and non-miners perspective. Journal of Safety Research. 2003;34(5):533-8.

Kaplan KA, Itoi A, Dement WC. Awareness of sleepiness and ability to predict sleep onset: can drivers avoid falling asleep at the wheel? Sleep Medicine. 2007;9(1):71-9.

Helmreich R, Musson D, Sexton J. Human factors and safety in surgery. Surgical patient safety: essential information for surgeons in today’s environment Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons. 2004.

Barfield W, Rosenberg C, Furness III TA. Situation awareness as a function of frame of reference, computer-graphics eyepoint elevation, and geometric field of view. The International journal of aviation psychology. 1995;5(3):233-56.

Wickens CD. Situation awareness and workload in aviation. Current directions in psychological science. 2002;11(4):128-33.

Stanton NA, Stewart R, Harris D, Houghton RJ, Baber C, McMaster R, et al. Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics. 2006;49(12-13):1288-311.

Patwary MA, O’Hare WT, Sarker MH. Occupational accident: An example of fatalistic beliefs among medical waste workers in Bangladesh. Safety science. 2012;50(1):76-82.

Khorasani-Zavareh D. System versus traditional approach in road traffic injury prevention: a call for action. J Inj Violence Res. 2011;3(2):61. Epub 2011/04/19.

Stewart HJ, Amitay S, Alain C. Neural correlates of distraction and conflict resolution for nonverbal auditory events. Scientific Reports. 2017;7.

Emilia I, Gómez-Urquiza JL, Cañadas GR, Albendín-García L, Ortega-Campos E, Cañadas-De la Fuente GA. Burnout and its relationship with personality factors in oncology nurses. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2017;30:91-6.

de Koster RB, Stam D, Balk BM. Accidents happen: The influence of safety-specific transformational leadership, safety consciousness, and hazard reducing systems on warehouse accidents. Journal of Operations management. 2011;29(7):753-65.

Mount MK, Barrick MR, Stewart GL. Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human performance. 1998;11(2-3):145-65.

Chao LL. Evidence of Objective Memory Impairments in Deployed Gulf War Veterans With Subjective Memory Complaints. Military Medicine. 2017;182(5).

da Silva FP. Mental Workload, Task Demand and Driving Performance: What Relation? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;162:310-9.

Yang C-W, Yang L-C, Cheng T-C, Jou Y-T, Chiou S-W. Assessing mental workload and situation awareness in the evaluation of computerized procedures in the main control room. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2012;250:713-9.

Yule S, Flin R, Murdy A. The role of management and safety climate in preventing risk-taking at work. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2006;7(2):137-51.

Pordanjani TR, Ebrahimi AM. The role of transformational leadership style and work-safety tension in prediction of incident reporting rate. Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2017;4(4):231-8.

Mullen J. Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work. Journal of safety research. 2004;35(3):275-85.

Hall GB, Dollard MF, Winefield AH, Dormann C, Bakker AB. Psychosocial safety climate buffers effects of job demands on depression and positive organizational behaviors. Anxiety, Stress & Coping. 2013;26(4):355-77.

Declerck CH, Boone C, De Brabander B. On feeling in control: a biological theory for individual differences in control perception. Brain and cognition. 2006;62(2):143-76.

Lanz JJ, Bruk-Lee V. Resilience as a Moderator of the Indirect Effects of Conflict and Workload on Job Outcomes among Nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2017.

  • Abstract Viewed: 500 times
  • PDF (فارسی) Downloaded: 302 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Language

  • فارسی
  • English

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Creative Commons License

This journal is distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC 4.0.

ISSN-Online: 2383-1901| ISSN-Print: 2345-2455

                      https://goo.gl/maps/Q5TCJTUWtv7nqhe1A

Powered by OJSPlus