The Social History Approach in Medical History Studies
Tārīkh-i pizishkī i.e., Medical History,
Vol. 18 (1405),
4 April 2026
,
Page 1-9
https://doi.org/10.22037/mhj.v18i.49045
Abstract
Background and Aim: Today, the social history approach plays a significant role in analyzing medical history and accurate understanding of medical concepts and practices within their social, cultural and economic contexts. This article aims to explore the significance and application of the social history approach in medical historiography.
Methods: This research utilizes a qualitative methodology and historiographic analysis grounded in social history discourse. Data were collected by examining historical archives, including newspapers, physicians' memoirs and documents obtained from reputable databases. Historical-documentary analysis was performed using primary and secondary sources alongside interdisciplinary research on medical history and the impact of social contexts.
Ethical Considerations: This study is based on historical sources and interdisciplinary research, with no direct human intervention or experimental trials involving human participants. All sources have been employed in compliance with intellectual property rights and research ethics. The researchers are committed to maintaining academic integrity and transparency in presenting data and historical arguments.
Results: The results indicate that the social history approach conceptualizes medicine as a social institution shaped profoundly by power structures, cultural beliefs and social determinants such as class, gender and ethnicity. For instance, the impact of social class on access to healthcare during the Safavid era is evident, with lower social strata resorting more frequently to alternative therapies and informal care networks. Additionally, the lived experiences of patients and healthcare providers shed light on often overlooked dimensions of medical history.
Conclusion: By opening new avenues for research, the social history approach enables scholars to undertake a comprehensive, multilayered analysis of medical history, emphasizing the critical role of social, cultural and structural factors in medical transformations. It is recommended that future researches focus on localized Iranian contexts, utilizing interdisciplinary methods and fieldwork to better capture the diverse lived experiences of communities. This approach holds promise for informing healthcare policy and enhancing contemporary understandings of health and disease.
- social history
- Social Determinants of Health
- Social Environment
- Historiography
- Health Equity
How to Cite
References
1. Stinchcombe AL. Theoretical methods in social history. New Jersey; Elsevier; 2013.
2. Thompson E. P. The making of the English working class. United Kingdom: Victor Gollancz Ltd Vintage Books; 1963.
3. Löwy I. The social history of medicine: Beyond the local. Social History of Medicine. 2007; 20(3): 465-481.
4. Wilson HJ. The myth of objectivity: Is medicine moving towards a social constructivist medical paradigm? Family Practice. 2000; 17(2): 203-209.
5. Money J. Gender: History, theory and usage of the term in sexology and its relationship to nature/nurture. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 1985; 11(2): 71-79.
6. Ramai D, Goldin S. Humanities in medicine: Preparing for practice. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2013; 2(5): 332-334.
7. Khudin K. Tpatients in seventeenth century Russia: From the history of medicine to social history. Odysseus Man in History. 2023; 30(1): 282-302.
8. Robak I, Alkov PD, Demochko PD. History of medical everyday as a projectional direction of historical and medical studies. 2023; 23-27.
9. Soares MJ. The medicinal recipes of Hannah Woolley: Everyday practice and female authority in seventeenth-century England. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos. 2023; 30: e2023007.
10. Metinsoy EM. Ottoman Women during World War I: Everyday experiences, politics, and conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
11. Naebian J, Dehghani R, Alipour Silab J. Vulgar Medicine in the Naseri era of Iran. Bi-quarterly Scientific Research Journal, History of Iran after Islam. 2015; 5(10): 170-201. [Persian]
12. Porter R. The patient's view: Doing medical history from below. Theory and Society. 1985; 14(2): 175-198.
13. Drakman A. When filth became dangerous: The miasmatic and contagionistic origins of nineteenth-century cleanliness practices among Swedish provincial doctors. Medical History. 2025 ; 69(1): 22-38.
14. Hillen HF. Barbarism: Education without history of medicine. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde. 2020; 164: D4309.
15. Wilson G. A New Society the Society for the Social History of Medicine. Medical History. 1970; 14(1): 108.
16. Jin P, Raznahan M. The Views of Different Groups on the Treatment of Plague and Cholera in the Safavid Period: An Analysis Based on Historical Texts. Historical Sciences Studies. 2020; 12(2): 21-42.
17. Shephard D. The casebook, the daybook, and the diary as sources in medical historiography. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History. 2000; 17(1): 245-55.
18. Thompson P. Oral history and the history of medicine: A review. Social History of Medicine. 1991; 4(2): 371-383.
19. Tomes N. Oral history in the history of medicine. The Journal of American History. 1991; 78(2): 607-617.
20. Garner A. State of the Discipline: Throwaway History: Towards a Historiography of Ephemera. Book History. 2021; 24(1): 244-63.
21. Helo A. Letting go of narrative history: The linearity of time and the art of recounting the past. European Journal of American Studies. 2016; 11(2-11): 1-17.
22. Waddington K. Problems of progress: Modernity and writing the social history of medicine. Social History of Medicine. 2021; 34(4): 1053-1067.
23. Warner JH. Grand narrative and its discontents: Medical history and the social transformation of American medicine. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2004; 29(4): 757-780.
24. Amster EJ. The past, present and future of race and colonialism in medicine. CMAJ. 2022; 194(20): E708-10.
25. Dekker JJ. The fragile relation between normality and marginality. Marginalization and institutionalization in the history of education. Peadegogica Historica. 1990; 26(2): 12-29.
26. Brandt AM. Emerging themes in the history of medicine. The Milbank Quarterly. 1991; 69(2): 199-214.
27. Clouston SA, Rubin MS, Phelan JC, Link BG. A social history of disease: contextualizing the rise and fall of social inequalities in cause-specific mortality. Demography. 2016; 53(5): 1631-1656.
28. Goyder EC, Botha JL, McNally PG. Inequalities in access to diabetes care: Evidence from a historical cohort study. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2000; 9(2): 85-89.
- Abstract Viewed: 112 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 61 times