مرکز تحقیقات اخلاق و حقوق پزشکی - دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Medical Figh

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Submissions
    • How to Submit Your Manuscript
    • Editorial Team
    • Transcription & Transliteration Guide
    • Style Sheet
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Forms
    • Commitment Form
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 14 No. 44 (1401): Medical Fighh Journal 2022; 14 (44)
  4. Research Article

Vol. 14 No. 44 (1401)

June 2022

Legitimacy of uterine transplantation in Imami jurisprudence

  • Nazila Taqavi
  • Hamid Abhary
  • Reza Amani Samani

Medical Figh, Vol. 14 No. 44 (1401), 9 June 2022 , Page 1-20
https://doi.org/10.22037/mfj.v14i44.37169 Published: 2022-06-04

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Background and Aim: Some women congenitally or due to illness have no uterus and are unable to conceive. But fortunately over the last decade it has become possible for them to become pregnant through a uterine transplantation. The purpose of this study was to jurisprudential investigated of uterine transplantation.

Materials and Methods: This article is written by descriptive-analytical method and using library resources by taking notes.

Conclusion: Some believe since uterine transplantation is risky for the donor, the reciever and the baby and it is not life-saving, and the woman without a uterus is able to experience childbearing through alternative methods, this practice is morally unacceptable. However, by studing the rules and principles of jurisprudence, it can be said that uterine transplantation is justifiable. It is worth noting although uterine transplantation is risky for the donor; this amount of risk can be justified by reasons such as the principle of dominance. Also, the sanctity of the harm to the reciever is lifted based on rules such as urgency, denial of hardship, etc. It should be noted that although there are alternative methods of childbearing for women without a uterus, but for some people, these methods are not desirable and they prefer the fetus to be in the wife's uterus. From a jurisprudential point of view, human beings have the right to have children, and since Permission in the object is also considered permission in its accessories, therefore uterine transplantation as a prelude to having children in a person without a uterus is allowed.

Keywords:
  • پیوند رحم ، رحم ، فقه امامیه
  • pdf (فارسی)

How to Cite

Taqavi, N., Abhary, H., & Amani Samani, R. (2022). Legitimacy of uterine transplantation in Imami jurisprudence. Medical Figh, 14(44), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22037/mfj.v14i44.37169
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Bronnstrom, M. Kahler P. Greite R. Molne, J. Diaz-Garca, C. Tullius SG. Uterus transplantation: a rapidly expanding field. Transplantation. 2018 (1397). 102(4): 611. [In English]

Milliez J. Uterine transplantation FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 (1388).106 (3): 27. [In English]

Hellström M. El-Akouri RR. Sihlbom C. Olsson BM. Lengqvist J. Bäckdahl H. et al. Towards the development of a bioengineered uterus: comparison of different protocols for rat uterus decellularization. Acta Biomater. 2014 (1393). 10(12): 5040. [In English]

Arora KS. BlakeV. Uterus transplantation: ethical and regulatory challenges. J Med Ethics. 2014 (1393). 40 (6): 3980. [In English]

Ejzenberg D. Mendes LR. Haddad LB. Baracat EC. D'Albuquerque LA. Andraus W. Uterine transplantation: a systematic review. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016 (1395). 71(11): 682. [In English]

Fageeh W. Raffa H. Jabbad H. Marzouki A. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynaecol. 2002 (1381).76(3): 247. [In English]

Johannesson L. Enskog A. Mölne J. Diaz-Garcia C. Hanafy A. Dahm-Kähler P. et al. Preclinical report on allogeneic uterus transplantation in non-human primates. Hum Reprod. 2013 (1392). 28(1): 1204. [In English]

Brannstrom M. Diaz-Garcia C. Johannesson L. Dahm-Kahler P. Bokstrom, H. Live birth after uterus transplantation. The Lancet. 2015(1394). 385 (9968): 559 & 613. [In English]

Gomel V. Uterine transplantation. Climacteric. 2019(1398). 22(2): 119. [In English]

Aljerian K. Uterine transplant: an ethical framework analysis from a Middle Eastern perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2021(1400). 37(6): 1051. [In English]

Jones BP. Williams N.J. Saso S. Thum MY. Quiroga I. Yazbek J. et al. “Uterine transplantation in transgender women. BJOG. 2019(1398). 126(2): 53. [In English]

Ozkan O. Dogan NU. Ozkan O. Mendilcioglu I. Dogan S. Aydinuraz. B. er al. Uterus transplantation: From animal models through the first heart beating pregnancy to the first human live birth. Womens Health (Lond). 2016(1395). 12 (4): 444. [In English]

Akouri R. Maalouf G. Abboud J. Waked A. Nakad T. Bedran F. et al. Uterus transplantation: An update and the Middle East perspective. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2017(1396). 22(3): 165. [In English]

National Advisory Commission on Biomedical Ethics NCE. Uterus transplantation Procedure-ethical considerations. 2018(1397). https://www.nek cne.admin.ch/en/homepage nek-cne: 1. [In English]

Flyckt R. Davis A. Farrell R. Zimberg S. Tzakis A. Falcone T. Uterine Transplantation: Surgical Innovation in the Treatment of Uterine Factor Infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018(1397). 40 (1): 89. [In English]

Kamranpour SB. Oudi M. Omani Samani R. Medical and ethical issues regarding assisted reproductive techniques in women of advanced age. Ijme. 2012 (1391). 5 (6): 5. [In English]

Brannstrom M. Johannesson L. Dahm-Kähler P. Enskog A. Mölne J. Kvarnström N. et al. First clinical uterus transplantation trial: a six-month report. Fertil Steril. 2014(1393). 101(5): 1233. [In English]

Catsanos R. Rogers W. Lotz M. The ethics of uterus transplantation. Bioethics. 2013(1392).27(2): 130. [In English]

Ansari M. Faraed al-Osol. 1nd ed. Qom: Majama al-Fekr al-Eslami; 1998(1419):63. [In Arabic]

Homeyr ī N. Shams al-Olom va Dava al-Kalam al-arab men al-Kolom. 1nd ed. Beirut: Dar al-Fekr al-Moaser; 1999(1420): 138. [In Arabic]

Mohammadi A. Rules of jurisprudence. 10nd ed.Tehran. Mizan. 2010(1389): 184. [In English]

Jokar SM. Gharibpour M. Parsa E. Medical hardness and embarrassment and its effect on wife’s right to divorce. 2021(1400). Medical Figh. 13(43): 5. [In English]

Gharzavi Y. Halal va Haram In Islam. 1nd ed. Tehran: Ehsan; 2015(1394):156. [In Arabic]

Hor Amili M. Vasael al-Shie. 1nd ed. Qom: Moasese al-Beyt Leehya al-tras; 1992(1412): 259. [In Arabic]

Koliyni M. Al-kafi. .1nd ed. Tehran: Dar al-Ketab Al-Eslamiyeh; 1987(1407): 4. [In Arabic]

Homiyrī N. Shams al-Olom va Dava al-Kalam al-arab men al-Kolom. 2nd ed. Beirut: Dar al-Fekr al-Moaser; 2000(1421): 84. [In Arabic]

Shahi Far Kh. Nazari Tavakoli S Omani Samani R. Abedini A. The conceptual scope of the rule of negation of hardship in jurisprudential chapters and its relationship with similar words. Jurisprudential principles of Islamic law. 2017(1396). 10 (2): 45. [In Persian]

Shokra M. Abbasi M. Cosmetic surgery from the perspective of jurisprudence and medical law. Medical Law . 2008(1387).2 (6): 75. [In Persian]

Rohani MS. al-Masael al-Mohdadese. Qom: Moasese Dar al-Ketab; 1994(1414): 314. [In Arabic]

Al-Shari M. Mirshakari M. Jalili M. Legitimacy and contractual nature of human organ transplantation. Medical Law. 2014(1393). 8 (33): 155. [In Persian]

Abdullahi A. Bey Hamideh. Rule of urgency (the necessities of explaining the prohibitions). Quarterly Journal of the Faculty of Theology and Education of Mashhad. 2004 (1383).63: 8. [In Persian]

Hosseini SA. Atakooi M. Jurisprudential explanation of Article 47 of the regulations on the execution of criminal sentences in organs removal from a sentenced to death. Medical Figh. 2021(1400). 13(43): 6. [In Persian]

Mohammadzadeh Mazinan E. Panah R. Application of the rule of Necessity and Urgency in treatment of the patient by a Stranger Physician. Medical Figh. 2021(1400). 12(42): 3. [In Persian]

Toosi A. Al-Tmiyan Fi al-Tafsir al-Qoran. 1nd ed. Qom: Maktab al-alam al-Eslami; 1988(1409): 159. [In Arabic]

Najafi M. Javahir al-Kalam Fi Sharh Sharaye al-Eslam. 1nd ed: Beirut: Dar Ahya al-Toras; 2009 (1430): 426. [In Arabic]

Mosavi Khomeyni R. Tozih al-Masael. . 1nd ed. Qom: Daftar Entesharat Eslami; 2000(1421): 491. [In Arabic]

Salame Z. Al-Atfal al-Anabib Bin al-Elm va al-Shariyeh. 1nd ed. Beirut: Dar Ahya al-Toras; 1996(1417): 232. [In Arabic]

Ibn Manzor M. Lisan al-Arab.1nd ed. Beirut: Dar Ahya al-Toras al-Arabi; 1987(1408): 3. [In Arabic]

Esfahani R. Al-Mofaradat fi Gharib al-Ghoran. 1nd ed. Cario; Al-Maktab al-Mortazavi; 1989(1306): 347. [In Arabic]

Rezania Moallem MR. Medical fertility from the perspective of jurisprudence and law. 2nd ed. Qom: Bostan Ketab; 2010 (1389). 253. [In Persian]

Adolescent D. The position of the emergency rule in the jurisprudential study of infertility treatment. Medical Fighh. 2010(1389). 2 (2): 70. [In Persian]

Salame Z. Al-Atfal al-Anabib Bin al-Elm va al-Shariyeh. 2nd ed. Beirut: Dar Ahya al-Toras. 1998(1419): 52. [In Arabic]

Sistani A. Tozih al-Masael. 1nd ed. Mashhad: Hatef; 1999(1378) 13. [In Persian]

Ardabili M. General Criminal Law. 1nd ed. Tehran: Mizan Publications. 2010(1389): 191. [In Persian]

Srinivasan S. Uterus transplants in India: yawning regulatory gaps. Indian J Med Ethics. 2017. 2(3): 136. [In English]

Jazayirii M. Montehi al-Darae Fi Toozih al-Kefaye. 1nd ed. Najaf: Matba al-Najaf. 1968(1388): 206. [In Arabic]

Safaī S. Abbasi MThe principle of non-harm in jurisprudence and Islamic law and its application in biomedical jurisprudence. Bioethics. 2015(1394). 5(17): 49. [In Persian]

Abdollahi H. Rule of urgency of necessities Explaining excuses. Quarterly Journal of Mashhad Faculty of Theology and Education. 2004(1389). 63: 48. [In Persian]

Javahiri H. Bohos Fi al-Feghh al-Moaser . 1nd ed. Beirut: Dar al-Zakhaer. 2002(1423): 273. [In Arabic]

Hoseini Maragheie A. Al-Anavin al-Fighh. 1nd ed. Qom: Daftae entesharat Esalami; (1417): 472. [In Persian]

Mostafavi M. Ehsan: Source of Responsibility. Jurisprudence and Law. 2005(1384). 2(6): 70. [In Persian]

Ghorbani F. Akhavian MA. Rezae Elham. Ruling on embryo donation from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence. Journal of Women. Midwifery and Infertility. 2012(1391). 15 (29): 28. [In Persian]

Mosavi Khomeyni R. Ketab al-bey. 1nd ed. Tehran: Moasse Tanzim va Nashr Asar Emam Khomeyni; 2009(1388) 236. [In Arabic]

Brannstrom M. Bokström H. Dahm. Kahler P. Diaz-Garcia C. Ekberg J. Enskog A. et al. One uterus bridging three generations: First live birth after mother‐to‐daughter uterus transplantation. Fertility and Sterility. 2016(1395). 106 (2): 263 & 264. [In English]

O’Donovan L. Pushing the boundaries: Uterine transplantation and the limits of reproductive autonomy. Bioethics. 2018(1397). 32(8): 494. [In English]

Sistani A. Menhaj al-Salehin. 2nd ed. Qom: Entesharat Ayatolah Seyed Ali Sistani; 1995(1416): 128. [In Persian]

Johannesson L. Enskog A. Molne J. Diaz-Garcia C. Hanafy A. Dahm-Kahler P. Uterus Transplantation Trial: 1-Year Outcome. Fertil Steril. 2015(1394). 103(1): 201. [In English]

McKay, D.B., & Josephson, M.A. Pregnancy in recipients of solid organs – Effects on mother and child. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2006. 354(12): 1288. [In English]

Motahari M. The system of women's rights in Islam. 1nd ed. Qom: sadra; 2002(1381). 241. [In Persian]

Ameli H. vasayel Alshiye al-Tahsil al-Masel al-Shariye. 1nd ed. Beirut: dar Ahya al-Arabi; n.d: 239 & 267. [In Arabic]

Hamdollahi a. Roshan M. Comparative jurisprudential and legal review of the contract for the use of a surrogate uterus. 1nd ed. Tehran: Majd; 2013(1392): 103 & 85 & 107. [In Persian]

Akhundi MM. Behjati Ardakani Z. Arefi S. Sadri Ardakani H. Arabi M. Zarnani AH et al. Introduction to natural fertilization, in vitro fertilization and the need to use alternative gametes in the treatment of infertility. Payesh. 2007(1386). 6 (4): 11. [In Persian]

Momen M. New methods of human reproduction from the perspective of jurisprudence and law. 1nd ed. Tehran: Pazhoheshkadeye Ibn Sīnā; 2010(1389): 56. [In Persian]

Golpaygani M. Majma al-Masael. 1nd ed. Qom: Moasese dar al-Qoran; (n.d). 2: 375. [In Persian]

Feyz A. Principles of jurisprudence and principles. 17nd ed. Tehran. daneshgah Tehran. 2005(1384): 180. [In Persian]

Mousavi Bojnourdi SM. Kazemi Afshar H. Transaction of Organs in Iranian Law with an Approach to Imam Khomeini's Jurisprudential Opinions. Matin. 2007(1386). 10 (38):104. [In Persian]

Saso S. Clarke A. Bracewell-Milnes T. SasoA. Al-Memar M. Thum M.Y. et al. Psychological issues associated with absolute uterine factor infertility and attitudes of patients toward uterine transplantation. Progress in Transplantation. 2016.26(1): 29. [In English]

Majlesi M. Bahar al-Anvar. 1nd ed. Tehran: Dar al-Kotob al-Eslamiyeh; 1983(1403): 22. [In Arabic]

Koleyni M. Al-Kafi. 1nd ed. Tehran: Dar al-Kotob al-Eslamiyeh; 1987(1407): 22. [In Persian]

Panah H. Research Phonology in Divine Verses. Strategic Studies of Women. 2005(1384). (27): 33. [In Persian]

Nori Hamedani H. One thousand and one jurisprudential issues. 1nd ed. Qom: Moasseseye Mahdi Mood; 1932(1311): 35. [In Persian]

Shahid Aval M. Al-Ghavaed va al-Favaed fi al-Fighh va al-Osol va al-Arabi. 1nd ed. Qom: Maktab al-Mofid; 1854(1270): 230. [In Arabic]

Heli H. Ghaved al-Ahkam. 1nd ed. Qom: Daftar Entesharat Eslami; (1413). 3: 163. [In Arabic]

Ameli Z. Masalek al-Afham eli Tanghh Sharaye al-Eslam. 2nd ed. Qom: Moassese al-Maaref al-Eslami; 1992(1413): 21. [In Arabic]

Safaie H. Introductory course in civil law General rules of contracts. 8nd ed. Tehran: Mizan; 2011(1390): 190. [In Persian]

Javid M. Theory of relativity in citizenship rights; An analysis based on the application of natural law. 8nd ed. Tehran: Grayesh; 2009(1388): 44. [In Persian]

Tosi M. Al-Mabsot fi feghh al-Emamiyeh. 2nd ed. Tehran: Al-maktab al-Mortazavi Ehya al-Asar al-jafari; 1999(1378): 9. [In Arabic]

Dehghan Mangabadi BA. Haeri M. Heidari f. Natural rights from the perspective of the Qur'an. Bi-Quarterly Book of Guardian. 2011(1390). 11 (1): 12. [In Persian]

Qomi A. Ghavanin al-Osol. 1nd ed. Tehran: Maktab al-Elmiyeh al-Eslamiyeh; 1999(1378). 1: 365. [In Arabic]

Safaie H. GhasemZadeh M. Civil rights of persons and interdicted. 11nd ed. Tehran: Samt; 2009(1389): 17. [In Persian]

Seifi Gh. Freedom of will and deprivation of fertility. Reproduction and infertility. 2009(1389). 11 (4): 300. [In Persian]

Malaurie PH. Aynes L. Civil Law, The persons and incapables. 3nd ed. Paris: Defrenois; 2007(1389):115. [In Persian]

Milanifar A. Khodaparast A. preserving fertility. 1nd ed. Tehran. Ibn Sina Research Institute Publications. 2007(1387): 235. [In Persian]

Dondorp WJ. De Wert GMW. Fertility preservation for healthy women: ethical aspects. Human Reproduction. 2009(1389). 24(8): 178. [In English]

Noghani F, Rohani M. Medical rulings. 1nd ed Tehran: Tabib; 1999(1378): 100. [In Persian]

Api M. Boxa A. Ceyhan M.Could the female-tomale transgender population be donor candidates for uterus transplantation?. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2017(1396). 14(4): 235. [In English]

  • Abstract Viewed: 529 times
  • pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 140 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Language

  • فارسی
  • English
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus