مجله اخلاق زیستی- علمی پژوهشی

Colin A, Capitan H. Traité de droit civil. Paris: Dalloz; 1953. p.102.

Katouzian N. Abuse of the right or fault in the implementation of the right. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences. 2006; 21(1): 103-115. [Persian]

Karimi A, Kandsari H. The logical relationship between the jurisprudential rule of harmlessness and the western rule of abuse of rights. Comparative Research Quarterly of Islamic and Western Laws. 2013; 2(1): 135-166. [Persian]

Ghestin J, Gooubeaux G. Traité de droit civil - Introduction générale. Paris: L.G.D.J; 1993. p.697.

Ameli M. Wasayil al-Shia. Qom: Al al-Bayt Institute; 1991. Vol.25 p.5, 429. [Arabic]

Koleini M. Al-Kafi. Tehran: Dar al-Kitab al-Islamiyya; 1988. Vol.5 p.293. [Arabic]

Sadouq A. Man la Yahzuruho al-Faqih. Qom: Jame'eye Modaresin; 1992. Vol.4 p.334. [Arabic]

Ansari M. Fraied al-Asul. Qom: Majma al-Fikr al-Islami; 1998. Vol.1 p.535. [Arabic]

Khorasani M. Kafayah al-Asul. Qom: Al al-Bayt Institute; 1988. Vol.1 p.381. [Arabic]

Bojnoordi M. Al-Qawaied al-Fiqhiyyah. Qom: Al-Hadi; 1998. Vol.1 p.214. [Arabic]

Khomeini R. Tahzeeb al-Asul. Qom: Jame'eye Modaresin; 2002. Vol.2 p.22. [Persian]

Damad M. Rules of jurisprudence, civil sector, ownership, responsibility. Tehran: Islamic Sciences Publishing Center; 2007. Vol.1 p.142. [Persian]

Ostadi R. "Defects", annulment of marriage. Ahl al-Bayt Jurisprudence Quarterly. 2009; 58(15): 94-128. [Persian]

Kalina V, Milokhova A. Civil law principle of good faith as an ethical and legal category. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2018; 1(3): 125-133.

Jafarzadeh G, Saraf H. Good faith in international contracts with universal rules or exceptional provisions. Journal of Legal Research. 2005; 41(8): 126-146. [Persian]

Whiteman M. Digest of International Law. Washington D.C: Government Printing Office; 1965. Vol.5 p.224.

Zamani Q. Legitimacy of economic sanctions the combination of prohibiting the abuse of rights with the normative hierarchy of fundamental human rights in the international system. Appendix published in the "International Economic Law". Tehran: Shahre Danesh; 2018. p.2. [Persian]

Jafari A, Heydari A. Measuring the feasibility of the jurisprudential rule of good faith. Journal of Fiqh and Fundamentals of Islamic Law. 2016; 2(50): 329-344. [Persian]

Available at: https://www.refworld.org/cases,ECH R,3ae6b6fb8.html. Retrieved on: January 04, 2020.

Palevic M, Djordjevic S. Freedom of information and abuse of media in the process of globalization. Webology. 2013; 10(1): 11-20.

W P and Others v. Poland (decision), 2 September 2004 [ECtHR].

Available at: http://www.associationline.org/guide book/action/read/section/jurisprudence/chapter/7/decision/218. Retrieved on: January 04, 2020.

Garaudy V. France A. no.65831/01, Decision 24 June 2003.

Available at: https://www.hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng# {%22 itemid%22:[%22001-23829%22]}. Retrieved on: January 04, 2020.

Mozafar M. Principles of jurisprudence. Qom: Al-Nashar al-Islami Institute; 2009. Vol.2 p.360. [Arabic]

Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/ 2017/dec/14/6700-rohingya-muslims-killed-in-attacks-in-myanmar-says-medecins-sans-frontieres. Retrieved on: March 11, 2020.

Ameli M. Wasayil al-Shia. Qom: Al al-Bayt Institute; 1991. Vol.17 p.341. [Arabic]

LeFebvre R, Franke V. Culture Matters: Individualism vs. Collectivism in Conflict Decision-Making. Societies. 2013; 3(1): 128-146.

Triandis H. Collectivism v. Individualism: A Reconceptualisation of a Basic Concept in Cross-cultural Social Psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020. p.60.