Specific Gaseous Conditions Significantly Improve Lactobacillus casei and Escherichia coli Survival to Freeze Drying and Rehydration
Applied Food Biotechnology,
Vol. 7 No 1 (2020),
24 dey 2019
,
Page 1-9
https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v7i1.26343
Résumé
Background and objective: Presence of oxygen during production and rehydration of freeze-dried starters and probiotics can decrease viability of the bacteria. Indeed, removal of water from cells during freeze-drying can promote dysfunction in anti-oxidative mechanisms, resulting in oxidative stress by accumulation of reactive oxygen species. The aim of this study was to show how atmospheric or less oxidative gaseous conditions affect bacterial survival to freeze-drying and rehydration of two strains, including Lactobacillus casei, a widely used bacteria in biotechnology, and Escherichia coli, a laboratory model bacteria.
Material and methods: Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 and Escherichia coli K12 were freeze dried for 24h in 5% sucrose (m v-1). Two gaseous conditions (an oxygen-free gas and atmospheric air) were used during various steps of the process, including bacterial cultivation, mixing of the bacteria with the protectant and rehydration. Oxygen-free gas condition was obtained with an oxygen-free gas, composed of nitrogen, hydrogen and carbon dioxide (N2H2CO2)and an anaerobic chamber.
Results and conclusion: Gaseous conditions included significant effects on bacterial survival rates (P<0.001 for Lactobacillus casei and Escherichia coli). Interestingly, for both bacteria, the optimal combination was atmospheric air during mixing of the bacteria with the lyoprotectant (P<0.001 for Lactobacillus casei and Escherichia coli) and N2H2CO2 during rehydration (P<0.001 for Lactobacillus casei and P<0.05 for Escherichia coli). Management of gaseous conditions during a freeze-drying process and rehydration (atmospheric air during mixing of the bacteria with lyoprotectant and oxygen-free gas during rehydration) enhances survival of the bacteria by preserving them from oxidative stress.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- ▪ Escherichia ▪ Freeze-drying ▪ Lactobacillus ▪ Oxidative stress ▪ Oxygen-free gas ▪ Rehydration
Comment citer
Références
Vesterlund S, Salminen K, Salminen S. Water activity in dry foods containing live probiotic bacteria should be carefully considered: A case study with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in flaxseed. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;157(2):319–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.05.016
Morgan CA, Herman N, White PA, Vesey G. Preservation of micro-organisms by drying; a review. J Microbiol Methods. 2006/04/25. 2006;66(2):183–93. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2006.02.017
Broeckx G, Vandenheuvel D, Claes IJJ, Lebeer S, Kiekens F. Drying techniques of probiotic bacteria as an important step towards the development of novel pharmabiotics. Int J Pharm. 2016/04/07. 2016;505(1–2):303–18. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.04.002
Makinen K, Berger B, Bel-Rhlid R, Ananta E. Science and technology for the mastership of probiotic applications in food products. J Biotechnol. 2012;162(4):356–65. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.07.006
Iaconelli C, Lemetais G, Kechaou N, Chain F, Bermudez-Humaran LG, Langella P, Gervais P, Beney L. Drying process strongly affects probiotics viability and functionalities. J Biotechnol. 2015/09/02. 2015;214:17–26. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.08.022 S0168-1656(15)30100-0
Ragoonanan V, Malsam J, Bond DR, Aksan A. Roles of membrane structure and phase transition on the hyperosmotic stress survival of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Biochim Biophys Acta - Biomembr. 2008;1778(10):2283–90. doi:10.1016/J.BBAMEM.2008.06.006
Imlay JA. Pathways of oxidative damage. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003/10/07. 2003;57:395–418. doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090938
Franca MB, Panek AD, Eleutherio EC. Oxidative stress and its effects during dehydration. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2006/04/04. 2007;146(4):621–31. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.02.030
Khan MT, van Dijl JM, Harmsen HJ. Antioxidants keep the potentially probiotic but highly oxygen-sensitive human gut bacterium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii alive at ambient air. PLoS One. 2014/05/07. 2014;9(5):e96097. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096097PONE-D-14-05376 [pii]
Reunanen J, Kainulainen V, Huuskonen L, Ottman N, Belzer C, Huhtinen H, de Vos WM, Satokari R. Akkermansia muciniphila Adheres to Enterocytes and Strengthens the Integrity of the Epithelial Cell Layer. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(11). doi:10.1128/AEM.04050-14
Quevrain E, Maubert MA, Michon C, Chain F, Marquant R, Tailhades J, Miquel S, Carlier L, Bermudez-Humaran LG, Pigneur B, Lequin O, Kharrat P, Thomas G, Rainteau D, Aubry C, Breyner N, Afonso C, Lavielle S, Grill JP, Chassaing G, Chatel JM, Trugnan G, Xavier R, Langella P, Sokol H, Seksik P. Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2015/06/06. 2016;65(3):415–25. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307649
Stefanovic E, Fitzgerald G, McAuliffe O. Advances in the genomics and metabolomics of dairy lactobacilli: A review. Food Microbiol. 2017;61:33–49. doi:10.1016/J.FM.2016.08.009
Brashears MM, Gilliland SE. Survival During Frozen and Subsequent Refrigerated Storage of Lactobacillus acidophilus Cells as Influenced by the Growth Phase1. J Dairy Sci. 1995;78(11):2326–35. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76859-X
Peterson BW, Sharma PK, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial cell surface damage due to centrifugal compaction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011/11/01. 2012;78(1):120–5. doi:10.1128/aem.06780-11
Fonseca F, Béal C, Corrieu G. Operating Conditions That Affect the Resistance of Lactic Acid Bacteria to Freezing and Frozen Storage. Cryobiology. 2002/03/13. 2001;43(3):189–98. doi:10.1006/cryo.2001.2343
Bozoǧlu TF, Özilgen M, Bakir U. Survival kinetics of lactic acid starter cultures during and after freeze drying. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1987;9(9):531–7. doi:10.1016/0141-0229(87)90082-2
Kim WS, Ren J, Dunn NW. Differentiation of Lactococcus lactis subspecies lactis and subspecies cremoris strains by their adaptive response to stresses. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999/02/13. 1999;171(1):57–65. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13412.x
Sinha RN, Shukla AK, Lal M, Ranganathan B. Rehydration of Freeze-Dried Cultures of Lactic Streptococci. J Food Sci. 1982;47(2):668–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb10148.x
de Valdez GF, de Giori GS, de Ruiz Holgado AP, Oliver G. Rehydration conditions and viability of freeze-dried lactic acid bacteria. Cryobiology. 1985;22(6):574–7. doi:10.1016/0011-2240(85)90034-3
Poirier I, Marechal P-A, Richard S, Gervais P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae viability is strongly dependant on rehydration kinetics and the temperature of dried cells. J Appl Microbiol. 1999/02/25. 1999;86(1):87–92. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00638.x
Mille Y, Beney L, Gervais P. Magnitude and kinetics of rehydration influence the viability of dehydrated E. coli K-12. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003/06/27. 2003;83(5):578–82. doi:10.1002/bit.10706
Lang E, Zoz F, Iaconelli C, Guyot S, Alvarez-Martin P, Beney L, Perrier-Cornet JM, Gervais P. Recovery Estimation of Dried Foodborne Pathogens Is Directly Related to Rehydration Kinetics. PLoS One. 2016/08/06. 2016;11(8):e0160844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160844PONE-D-16-10339 [pii]
- Résumé ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 1591 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
- PDF (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 983 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##