Growth Optimization of Lactobacillus plantarum T5jq301796.1, an Iranian Indigenous Probiotic in Lab Scale Fermenter
Applied Food Biotechnology ,
Vol. 3 Núm. 3 (2016),
28 junio 2016
,
Página 188-193
https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v3i3.11469
Resumen
Background and Objective: Lactobacillus plantarum is one of the probiotics species used in functional food products. These bacteria or their purified bacteriocins are used as biological preservatives in the food industry. The first step in production of an array of probiotic products is optimizing production in fermentors. This study aimed to examine factors affecting the in vitro growth optimization of Lactobacillus plantarum T5JQ301796.1 in a lab scale fermentor.
Materials and Methods: Following 24 hours of anaerobic culture of the lactobacillus at 37°C, the pre-culture was ready and was inoculated to a 5 liter fermentor at 37°C and stirred at 40 rpm. Then factors affecting lactobacillus growth including carbon and nitrogen sources and pH were studied. The results were interpreted using response surface methodology (RSM), and optimal conditions for the equipment were determined.
Results and Conclusion: For optimal growth of Lactobacillus plantarum T5JQ301796.1 in lab scale fermentor, the optimal conditions were 25.96 gl-1 of glucose, 1.82% of yeast extract, pH of 7.26, and stirring at 40 rpm at optimum temperature between 37-40°C. In this condition, maximum viable cell in the batch fermentation was 1.25×1010 CFU ml-1. Application of central composite design for the growth optimization of this bacterium led to maximum viable cells equal to 1.25×1010 CFU ml-1. So the mentioned features can lead to optimum industrial scale production and usage of this probiotic strain in probiotic products.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Fermentor
- Lactobacillus plantarum
- Optimization
- Probiotic
- Response surface methodology
Cómo citar
Citas
Granato, D., et al., Functional foods and nondairy probiotic food development: trends, concepts, and products. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2010. 9(3): p. 292-302.
Mattila-Sandholm, T., et al., Technological challenges for future probiotic foods. International Dairy Journal, 2002. 12(2): p. 173-182.
Pineiro, M. and C. Stanton, Probiotic bacteria: legislative framework—requirements to evidence basis. The Journal of nutrition, 2007. 137(3): p. 850S-853S.
Tannock, G.W., Probiotic properties of lactic-acid bacteria: plenty of scope for fundamental R & D. Trends in biotechnology, 1997. 15(7): p. 270-274.
Dunne, C., et al., In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2001. 73(2): p. 386s-392s.
Collins, J., G. Thornton, and G. Sullivan, Selection of probiotic strains for human applications. International dairy journal, 1998. 8(5): p. 487-490.
Senthilkumar, P., Antibacterial Potential of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Its Metabolites against Food Borne Pathogens. International Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biological Archive, 2012. 3(2).
Lee, J.W., et al., Immunomodulatory and antitumor effects in vivo by the cytoplasmic fraction of Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum. Journal of veterinary science, 2004. 5(1): p. 41-48.
Lee, Y.K. and S. Salminen, Handbook of probiotics and prebiotics. 2009: John Wiley & Sons.
Matsuzaki, T. and J. Chin, Modulating immune responses with probiotic bacteria. Immunology and cell biology, 2000. 78(1): p. 67-73.
Macfarlane, G.T. and J.H. Cummings, Probiotics, infection and immunity. Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2002. 15(5): p. 501-506.
Lew, L.C., M.T. Liong, and C.Y. Gan, Growth optimization of Lactobacillus rhamnosus FTDC 8313 and the production of putative dermal bioactives in the presence of manganese and magnesium ions. Journal of applied microbiology, 2013. 114(2): p. 526-535.
Khuri, A.I. and S. Mukhopadhyay, Response surface methodology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2010. 2(2): p. 128-149.
Myers, R.H., D.C. Montgomery, and C.M. Anderson-Cook, Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Vol. 705. 2009: John Wiley & Sons.
Myers, R.H., A.I. Khuri, and W.H. Carter, Response surface methodology: 1966–l988. Technometrics, 1989. 31(2): p. 137-157.
Tafizi, F., E.M. Tajabadi,, and L KHojareh, Molecular identification of probiotic lactobacill BACTERIA from TARKHINEH tarkhineh AND and tarkhineh dough by 16S RDNA sequencing.
Tafvizi, F. and M. Tajabadi Ebrahimi, Detection of genetic diversity and classification of lactobacillus species isolated from Iranian traditional dairy products by RAPD fingerprinting and POPGENE analysis. analysis (PCO). 20: p. 21.
- Resumen ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.viewed##: 1159 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##
- PDF (English) ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.downloaded##: 1514 ##plugins.themes.ojsPlusA.frontend.article.times##