Background and Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the endophytic microbial flora of different wheat varieties to check whether a better yielding variety also harbours superior plant growth promoting bacteria. Such bacteria are helpful in food biotechnology as their application can enhance the yield of the crop.
Material and Methods: Three wheat varieties (Seher, Faisalabad and Lasani) were selected, Seher being the most superior variety. endophytic bacteria were isolated from the histosphere of the leaves and roots at different growth phases of the plants. The isolates were analyzed for plant growth promoting activities. Isolates giving best results were identified through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Excel 2013. All the experiments were conducted in triplicates.
Results and Conclusion: The endophytes of Seher variety showed maximum plant growth promoting abilities. Among the shoot endophytes, the highest auxin production was shown by Seher isolate SHHP1-3 up to 51.9μg ml-1, whereas in the case of root endophytes, the highest auxin was produced by SHHR1-5 up to 36 μg ml-1. The bacteria showing significant plant growth promoting abilities were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing. Bacillus, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria species were the dominant bacteria showing all the traits of plant growth promotion. It can be concluded that Seher variety harbours superior plant growth promoting endophytes that must be one of the reasons for its better growth and yield as compared to the other two varieties. The investigated results support possible utilization of the selected isolates in wheat growth promotion with respect to increase in agro-productivity. The application of such bacteria could be useful to enhance wheat yield and can help in food biotechnology.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Tan RX, Zou WX. Endophytes: a rich source of functional metabolites. Nat Prod Rep. 2001;18(4):448-59. Epub 2001/09/08.
Bouarab K, Potin P, Correa J, Kloareg B. Sulfated oligosaccharides mediate the interaction between a marine red alga and its green algal pathogenic endophyte. Plant Cell. 1999;11(9):1635-50.
Marler M, Pedersen D, Mitchell-Olds T, Callaway RM. A polymerase chain reaction method for detecting dwarf mistletoe infection in Douglas-fir and western larch. Can J For Res. 1999;29(9):1317-21.
Chanway CP. Endophytes: they're not just fungi! Can J Bot. 1996;74(3):321-2.
Founoune H, Duponnois R, Bâ AM, Sall S, Branget I, Lorquin J, et al. Mycorrhiza helper bacteria stimulate ectomycorrhizal symbiosis of Acacia holosericea with Pisolithus alba. New Phytologist. 2002;153(1):81-9.
Sturz AV, Nowak J. Endophytic communities of rhizobacteria and the strategies required to create yield enhancing associations with crops. Appl Soil Ecol. 2000;15(2):183-90.
McInroy J, Kloepper J. Survey of indigenous bacterial endophytes from cotton and sweet corn. Plant Soil. 1995;173(2):337-42.
Sprent J, James E. N2-fixation by endophytic bacteria: questions of entry and operation. In: Fendrik I, Gallo M, Vanderleyden J, Zamaroczy M, editors. Azospirillum VI and Related Microorganisms: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1995. p. 15-30.
Baldani J, Caruso L, Baldani VLD, Goi SR, Döbereiner J. Recent advances in BNF with non-legume plants. Soil Biol Biochem. 1997;29(5–6):911-22.
Gallon JR. Reconciling the incompatible: N2 fixation and O2. New Phytologist. 1992;122(4):571-609.
Bashan Y, Holguin G. Azospirillum – plant relationships: environmental and physiological advances (1990–1996). Can J Microbiol. 1997;43(2):103-21.
Leifert C, Morris CE, Waites WM. Ecology of microbial saprophytes and pathogens in tissue culture and field-grown plants: Reasons for contamination problems in vitro. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 1994;13(2):139-83.
Strobel G, Daisy B. Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67(4):491-502.
Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual: Pearson Benjamin Cummings; 2007.
Gordon SA, Weber RP. Colorimetric estimation of Indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol. 1951;26(1):192-5.
Marques APGC, Pires C, Moreira H, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML. Assessment of the plant growth promotion abilities of six bacterial isolates using Zea mays as indicator plant. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42(8):1229-35.
Pikovskaya RI. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil connection with the vital activity of some microbial species. Microbiologiya. 1948;17:362-70.
Bernbom N, Ng YY, Kjelleberg S, Harder T, Gram L. Marine bacteria from Danish coastal waters show antifouling activity against the marine fouling bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain S91 and zoospores of the green alga Ulva australis independent of bacteriocidal activity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(24):8557-67.
Porsby CH, Nielsen KF, Gram L. Phaeobacter and Ruegeria Species of the Roseobacter clade colonize separate niches in a Danish Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)-rearing farm and antagonize Vibrio anguillarum under different growth conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(23):7356-64.
Kuklinsky-Sobral J, Araújo WL, Mendes R, Geraldi IO, Pizzirani-Kleiner AA, Azevedo JL. Isolation and characterization of soybean-associated bacteria and their potential for plant growth promotion. Environ Microbiol. 2004;6(12):1244-51.
Micallef SA, Channer S, Shiaris MP, Colon-Carmona A. Plant age and genotype impact the progression of bacterial community succession in the Arabidopsis rhizosphere. Plant Signaling and Behav. 2009;4(8):777-80.
White PJ, Hammond J. The Ecophysiology of Plant-Phosphorus Interactions: Springer; 2008.
Liu Y, Zuo S, Zou Y, Wang J, Song W. Investigation on diversity and population succession dynamics of endophytic bacteria from seeds of maize (Zea mays L., Nongda108) at different growth stages. Ann Microbiol. 2013;63(1):71-9.
Fierer N, Nemergut D, Knight R, Craine JM. Changes through time: integrating microorganisms into the study of succession. Res Microbiol. 2010;161(8):635-42.