Policy Framework for Controlling Occupational Exposure to Non-Ionizing Radiation: From Identification to Control Safety Policy and Occupational Exposure Management for Non-Ionizing Radiation
Irtiqa Imini Pishgiri Masdumiyat (Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention),
Vol. 13 No. 4 (1404),
17 August 2026
,
Page 30-43
https://doi.org/10.22037/iipm.v13i4.52402
Abstract
Background and Aim
The widespread use of non-ionizing radiation technologies in industrial, medical, telecommunication, and electronic sectors has increased occupational and public exposure to these radiations. Ultraviolet radiation, lasers, electromagnetic fields, radiofrequency waves, and microwaves are among the major sources of exposure that may adversely affect human health if not properly controlled. Growing concerns regarding the potential health effects of these radiations have highlighted the need for developing comprehensive policy and management frameworks. This study aimed to propose a policy framework for controlling occupational exposure to non-ionizing radiation and to provide a systematic approach from hazard identification to risk control.
Materials and Methods
This descriptive-analytical study was conducted using a policy research approach. Required data were collected through a review of scientific literature, international standards, guidelines, and studies related to non-ionizing radiation. Occupational hazards associated with ultraviolet radiation, lasers, electromagnetic fields, and radiofrequency radiation were analyzed regarding exposure sources, biological effects, occupational exposure limits, monitoring methods, and control strategies. The roles of engineering controls, administrative controls, personal protective equipment, and monitoring systems in exposure reduction were also evaluated.
Results
The findings indicated that workers in welding industries, healthcare facilities, laser-based workplaces, telecommunication systems, and electronic industries are exposed to higher levels of non-ionizing radiation. Uncontrolled exposure may lead to skin disorders, ocular damage, thermal effects, biological alterations, and increased occupational health risks. The results also revealed that the absence of continuous monitoring programs, inadequate professional training, insufficient implementation of engineering controls, and poor compliance with exposure limits are among the major management challenges in occupational settings. Furthermore, engineering controls, source enclosure, interlock systems, continuous monitoring, and worker training were identified as the most effective strategies for reducing exposure.
Conclusion
Effective management of non-ionizing radiation hazards requires a comprehensive, multidimensional, and prevention-oriented policy approach. Developing an integrated policy framework that includes hazard identification, exposure assessment, continuous monitoring, worker training, and implementation of engineering controls can significantly reduce occupational risks and protect workers’ health. Strengthening monitoring systems, enhancing professional supervision, and developing national standards are essential components of non-ionizing radiation safety management.
- Electromagnetic fields
- Laser safety
- Occupational exposure
- Occupational health
- Radiation protection
- Safety policy
- 2026-09-07 (2)
- 2026-08-17 (1)
How to Cite
References
1. Hajizadeh R, Montazeri A, Esnaasharieh M. Non-ionizing radiation: identification, evaluation, and control. Tehran: Asar-e Sobhan; 2025.
2. World Health Organization. Ultraviolet radiation and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.
3. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines on limits of exposure to ultraviolet radiation of wavelengths between 180 nm and 400 nm (incoherent optical radiation). Health Physics. 2004;87(2):171-186. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-200408000-00006
4. Ziegelberger G, Croft R, Feychting M, Green AC, Hirata A, d'Inzeo G, Jokela K, Loughran S, Marino C, Miller S, Oftedal G. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics. 2020;118(5):483-524. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001210
5. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Non-ionizing radiation: overview. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Labor; 2022. https://www.osha.gov/non-ionizing-radiation
6. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). 2023 TLVs and BEIs: Based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati (OH): ACGIH; 2023.
7. World Health Organization. Radiation: Non-ionizing radiation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
8. Johnson TE. Introduction to health physics. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017.
9. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Hierarchy of Controls. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Labor; 2022. https://www.osha.gov/safety-management/hazard-prevention
10. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Principles for non-ionizing radiation protection. Health Physics. 2020;118(5):477-482. https://doi.org/10.1097/hp.0000000000001252
11. International Labour Organization. Radiation protection of workers (ionising radiations): an ILO code of practice. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 1987.
12. Qanun-e Hefazat dar Barabar-e Ash'eh (Law on Protection against Radiation). Tehran: Islamic Consultative Assembly, Islamic Republic of Iran; 1989. https://qavanin.ir/Law/TreeText/?IDS=17739902999358640384
13. Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran (ISIRI). Iranian National Standard No. 8567: Non-Ionizing Radiation Safety Requirements. Revision 2024. https://standard.inso.gov.ir/
14. Communications Regulatory Authority (CRA). Official regulatory document on continuous monitoring of radiofrequency radiation. Tehran: Communications Regulatory Authority; 2024. https://www.cra.ir/
15. Ministry of Cooperatives, Labour and Social Welfare. Ayin-nameh-ye Amuzesh-e Imeni-ye Karfarmayan, Kargaran va Karamuzan (Regulation on Safety Training for Employers, Workers, and Apprentices). Tehran: Ministry of Cooperatives, Labour and Social Welfare; 2022. https://rc.majlis.ir/
16. Ministry of Cooperatives, Labour and Social Welfare. Eslah-e Mavad-e 9 va 12 Ayin-nameh-ye Amuzesh-e Imeni, approved 2022 (Amendment to Articles 9 and 12 of the Safety Training Regulation). Tehran: Ministry of Cooperatives, Labour and Social Welfare; 2022. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa
17. Sliney DH, Mellerio J. Safety with lasers and other optical sources: a comprehensive handbook. New York: Springer; 2013.
18. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60825-1:2014. Safety of laser products—Part 1: Equipment classification and requirements. 3rd ed. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2014.
19. American National Standards Institute. ANSI Z136.1-2022: American National Standard for Safe Use of Lasers. Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute; 2022.
20. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Biological effects and exposure criteria for radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. NCRP Report No. 86. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; 1986.
21. Dürrenberger G, Fröhlich J, Röösli M, Mattsson MO. EMF monitoring—Concepts, activities, gaps and options. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014;11(9):9460-9479. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110909460
22.World Health Organization. Electromagnetic fields and public health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
23. Vecchia P. Exposure of humans to electromagnetic fields. Standards and regulations. Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità. 2007;43(3):260-267. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17938457/
24. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Guidelines for laser safety and hazard assessment. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Labor; 1991.
25. Modenese A, Gobba F. Occupational exposure to non-ionizing radiation: main effects and criteria for health surveillance of workers according to the European Directives. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2020 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe); 2020; Madrid, Spain. p. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope49358.2020.9160831
- Abstract Viewed: 30 times
- 5 (فارسی) Downloaded: 16 times