نقش درک خطر بر مولفه هاي رفتار ايمني: تبيين اثرميانجي انگيزه ايمني و تعديل گر جوّ ايمني همکاران و سرپرست
ارتقای ایمنی و پیشگیری از مصدومیت ها,
دوره 8 شماره 4 (1399),
30 بهمن 2021
,
صفحه 237 - 227
https://doi.org/10.22037/meipm.v8i4.32127
چکیده
سابقه و هدف: مطالعات قبلي تأثير درک خطر را بر انطباق ايمني تأييد کردهاند، اما تا حد زيادي بحث برانگيز بودند. اين مطالعه با هدف تبيين اين تعارض و سازوکاري است که از طريق آن درک خطر ميتواند بر رفتار ايمني تأثير بگذارد.
روش: روش پژوهش حاضر توصيفي و از نوع همبستگي بود. جامعة آماري اين تحقيق کليه کارکنان سازمان آتشنشاني و خدمات ايمني همدان به تعداد 800 نفر بوده که حجم نمونه براساس جدول مورگان تعداد 261 نفر با استفاده از روش نمونهگيري تصادفي ساده تعيين شد. براي گردآوري دادههاي پژوهش از چهار پرسشنامه استاندارد درک خطر، رفتار ايمني، انگيزهي ايمني و جوّ ايمني استفاده شد و الگوي ارائه شده با استفاده از مدلسازي معادلات ساختاري تجزيه و تحليل گرديد.
يافتهها: نتايج اين پژوهش نشان داد: درک خطر بر انگيزه ايمني آتشنشانان همدان تأثير معناداري داشت (66/0). انگيزه ايمني بر انطباق ايمني (64/0) و مشارکت ايمني (42/0) آتشنشانان همدان تأثير معناداري داشت. انگيزه ايمني در تأثيرگذاري درک خطر بر انطباق ايمني (61/0) و مشارکت ايمني (37/0) آتشنشانان همدان نقش ميانجي داشت. همچنين جوّ ايمني سرپرست (66/0) و جوّ ايمني همکاران (58/0) رابطه درک خطر و انگيزه ايمني را تعديل ميکرد.
نتيجهگيري: بهطور کلي از نتايج به دست آمده ميتوان دريافت درک خطر و جوّ ايمني عواملي هستند که انگيزه ايمني، مشارکت ايمني و انطباق ايمني را تحت تأثير قرار ميدهند. بر اين اساس پيشنهاد ميشود که درک خطر و جوّ ايمني بيشتر مورد توجه قرار گيرند.
How to cite this article: Aghighi A, Souri M. The Role of Risk Perception on Safety Behavior: Mediated by Safety Motivation and the Moderating Role of co-workers' and Supervisor Safety Climate. J Saf Promot Inj Prev. 2021; 8(4):227- 37.
- درک خطر، رفتار ایمنی، مشارکت ایمنی، انگیزه¬ی ایمنی، جو ایمنی
ارجاع به مقاله
مراجع
Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of applied psychology. 2009;94(5):1103.
Li F, Jiang L, Yao X, Li Y. Job demands, job resources and safety outcomes: The roles of emotional exhaustion and safety compliance. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2013 Mar 1;51:243-51.
Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA. Safety at work: a meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of applied psychology. 2011;96(1):71-94.
Liang H, Lin KY, Zhang S, Su Y. The impact of coworkers’ safety violations on an individual worker: A social contagion effect within the construction crew. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(4):773.
Beus JM, Dhanani LY, McCord MA. A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: Addressing unanswered questions. Journal of applied psychology. 2015 Mar;100(2):481.
Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP, Gerras SJ. Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88(1):170.
Zou PXW, Sunindijo RY, Dainty ARJ. A mixed methods research design for bridging the gap between research and practice in construction safety. Safety science. 2014;70:316-26.
Heinrich HW, Petersen D, Roos N. In dustrial accident prevention: a safety management approach. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
Haslam RA, Hide SA, Gibb AGF, Gyi DE, Pavitt T, Atkinson S, et al. Contributing factors in construction accidents. Applied ergonomics. 2005;36(4):401-15.
Didla S, Mearns K, Flin R. Safety citizenship behaviour: A proactive approach to risk management. Journal of Risk Research. 2009;12(3-4):475-83.
Kouabenan DRm, Ngueutsa R, Mbaye St. Safety climate, perceived risk, and involvement in safety management. Safety Science. 2015;77:72-9.
Seo D-C. An explicative model of unsafe work behavior. Safety science. 2005;43(3):187-211.
Tomas JM, Melia JL, Oliver A. A cross-validation of a structural equation model of accidents: organizational and psychological variables as predictors of work safety. Work & Stress. 1999;13(1):49-58.
Xia N, Wang X, Griffin MA, Wu C, Liu B. Do we see how they perceive risk? An integrated analysis of risk perception and its effect on workplace safety behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2017;106:234-42.
Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demands–resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. Journal of occupational health psychology. 2017;22(3):273.
Hobfoll SE, Freund AM, Riediger M, Lazarus RS, Quick JC, Gavin JH, et al. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancing conservation of Resources theory. Applied psychology. 2001;50(3):337-421.
Karanikas N, Popovich A, Steele S, Horswill N, Laddrak V, Roberts T. Symbiotic types of systems thinking with systematic management in occupational health & safety. Safety science. 2020 Aug 1;128:104752.
Duryan M, Smyth H, Roberts A, Rowlinson S, Sherratt F. Knowledge transfer for occupational health and safety: cultivating health and safety learning culture in construction firms. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2020;139:105496.
Sui Y, Ding R, Wang H. A novel approach for occupational health and safety and environment risk assessment for nuclear power plant construction project. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020 Mar 6:120945.
Jafari MJ, Gharari M, Kalantari S, Omidi L, Ghaffari M, Fardi GRA. The influence of safety training on improvement in safety climate in construction sites of a firm. Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2015;2(4):257-64.
Dov Z. Safety climate and beyond: A multi-level multi-climate framework. Safety science. 2008;46(3):376-87.
Morrow SL, McGonagle AK, Dove-Steinkamp ML, Walker Jr CT, Marmet M, Barnes-Farrell JL. Relationships between psychological safety climate facets and safety behavior in the rail industry: A dominance analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010;42(5):1460-7.
Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal of applied psychology. 1980;65(1):96.
Zohar D. Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. 2003.
Soori S, Sebt M-H, Ardeshir A. Risk perception assessment and its related factors among construction workers. Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2016;4(4):261-8.
Allahyari T, Fard ZS, Khalkhali HR, Mohebbi I. An investigation on the relationship between error culture and safety outcomes among employees of a petrochemical industry. Safety promotion and injury prevention (Tehran). 2014;2(2):85-94.
Gyekye SA, Salminen S. Are “good soldiers” safety conscious? An examination of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors and perception of workplace safety. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 2005;33(8):805-20.
Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of applied psychology. 2006;91(4):946-53.
Vinodkumar MN, Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010;42(6):2082-93.
Brondino M, Silva SA, Pasini M. Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: Co-workers as the missing link. Safety science. 2012;50(9):1847-56.
Xia N, Xie Q, Hu X, Wang X, Meng H. A dual perspective on risk perception and its effect on safety behavior: A moderated mediation model of safety motivation, and supervisor’s and coworkers’ safety climate. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2020;134:105350.
M. Goldenhar* L, Williams LJ, G. Swanson N. Modelling relationships between job stressors and injury and near-miss outcomes for construction labourers. Work & Stress. 2003;17(3):218-40.
Clarke S. Safety leadership: A meta‐analytic review of transformational and transactional leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology. 2013;86(1):22-49.
Fang D, Wu C, Wu H. Impact of the supervisor on worker safety behavior in construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2015;31(6):04015001.
Zohar D, Polachek T. Discourse-based intervention for modifying supervisory communication as leverage for safety climate and performance improvement: A randomized field study. Journal of applied psychology. 2014;99(1):113-24.
Bronkhorst B. Behaving safely under pressure: The effects of job demands, resources, and safety climate on employee physical and psychosocial safety behavior. Journal of safety research. 2015;55:63-72.
Weiss S, Baker GS, Gupta RD. Vibrational residual stress relief in a plain carbon steel weldment. Welding Research Supplement. 1976.
Farh JL, Cheng BS. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. InManagement and organizations in the Chinese context 2000 (pp. 84-127). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Chao AA, Kao SR. Paternalistic leadership and subordinate stress in Taiwanese enterprises. Research in Applied Psychology. 2005;27:111-31.
Chen H-Y, Kao HS-R. Chinese paternalistic leadership and non-Chinese subordinates’ psychological health. The international journal of human resource management. 2009;20(12):2533-46.
Lindholm M, Reiman A, Vأ¤yrynen S. On Future Occupational Safety and Health Challenges. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Safety. 2020;4(1):108-27.
- چکیده مشاهده شده: 269 بار