بررسي نقش سبک رهبري تحولي و فشار ايمني-کار در پيشبيني نرخ گزارش دهي رويدادهاي شغلي
ارتقای ایمنی و پیشگیری از مصدومیت ها,
دوره 4 شماره 4 (2016),
9 April 2017
,
صفحه 231-238
https://doi.org/10.22037/meipm.v4i4.16734
چکیده
سابقه و هدف: طبق گزارش هاي سازمان بينالمللي کار، حوادث منجر به آسيب در محيطهاي کاري، داراي پيامدهاي ناگوار و نامطلوب انساني، اجتماعي و اقتصادي ميباشد. شناسايي عوامل مؤثر در نرخ رويدادهاي شغلي، ميتواند در پيشگيري از آنها مفيد باشد. يکي از اين عوامل، متغيرهاي سازماني ميباشد؛ بنابراين هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسي متغيرهاي سبک رهبري تحولي و فشار ايمني-کار بهعنوان پيشبينهاي نرخ گزارش دهي رويدادهاي شغلي کارکنان يک شرکت صنعتي بود.
روش بررسي: در اين پژوهش مقطعي- تحليلي، جامعه آماري کليه کارکنان صف شاغل در يک شرکت صنعتي بودند. تعداد 265 نفر از آنها با استفاده از روش نمونهگيري تصادفي طبقهاي بهعنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. شرکتکنندگان با استفاده از مقياسهاي سبک رهبري تحولي، فشار کاري ادراکشده و نرخ گزارش دهي رويدادها موردسنجش قرار گرفتند. براي تحليل دادهها از ضريب همبستگي پيرسون و روش رگرسيون چندگانه با استفاده از نرمافزار SPSS نسخه 19 و در بخش اعتبار يابي از تحليل عاملي تائيدي با استفاده از نرمافزار AMOS نسخه 21 استفاده شد.
يافتهها: يافتهها نشان داد، ضريب همبستگي بين رهبري تحولي با نرخ گزارش دهي رويدادهاي شغلي منفي و معنيدار بود ( 0001/0>P). همچنين ضريب همبستگي بين فشار ايمني-کار با نرخ گزارش دهي رويدادهاي شغلي مثبت و معنيدار بود ( 0001/0>P). تحليل رگرسيون با روش مرحلهاي نشان داد که به ترتيب متغيرهاي فشار ايمني-کار و رهبري تحولي ميتوانند نرخ گزارش دهي رويدادهاي شغلي کارکنان را پيشبيني کنند (283/0= R2، 0001/0>P).
نتيجهگيري: نتايج پژوهش حاضر اهميت سبک رهبري تحولي و فشار ايمني-کار را بهعنوان پيشبينهاي نرخ گزارش دهي رويدادهاي شغلي نشان ميدهد؛ بنابراين توصيه ميشود بهمنظور گزينش افراد براي محيطهاي پرخطر مثل صنايع پتروشيمي و همچنين در دورههاي آموزشي، بر اين متغيرها تأکيد شود.
How to cite this article:
Rahimi Pordanjani T, Mohamadzade Ebrahimi A. The role of Transformational Leadership Style and Work-Safety Tension in Prediction of Incident Reporting Rate. J Saf Promot Inj Prev. 2016; 4(4): 231-8.
- نرخ گزارش دهي رويدادهاي شغلي، رهبري تحولي، فشار ايمني-کار
ارجاع به مقاله
مراجع
Raouf A, Dhillon BS. Safety assessment: A quantitative approach: Lewis Publishers; 1994.
Azadeh A, Nouri J, Mohammad Fam I. The impacts of total system design factors on human performance in power plants. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 2005;2(9):1301-04.
Soltanzadeh A, Mohammadfam I, Mahmoudi S, Savareh BA, Arani AM. Analysis and Forecasting the Severity of Construction Accidents using Artificial Neural Network. Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2017;4(3):183-90.
Seo DC. An explicative model of unsafe work behavior. Safety Science. 2005;43(3):187-211.
Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA, editors. Predicting safety performance: a meta-analysis of safety and organizational constructs. 22nd annual conference of the society for industrial and organizational psychology, New York; 2007.
The paradox I in work accident death toll, warns the increase in accidents in underground labor market [database on the Internet]. ilna. 2015. Available from: http:// www.ilnaoline.ir.
Brauer RL. Safety and health for engineers. 1, editor: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
Lee T. The role of attitudes in the safety culture and how to change them. Conference on ‘Understanding Risk Perception’ Aberdeen: Offshore Management Centre, The Robert Gordon University; 1995.
Avolio BJ. Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations: Sage; 1999.
Bass BM, Avolio BJ. The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development 1990;4:231-72.
Judge TA, Bono JE. Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of applied psychology. 2000;85(5):751-65. [PubMed]
Spector PE. Industrial and organizational psychology research and practice. Translated by: Mohamadi SH, 4th ed. Tehran: Arasbaran; 2006.
Barling J, Loughlin C, Kelloway EK. Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of applied psychology. 2002;87(3):488-96. [PubMed]
Pillai R, Schriesheim CA, Williams ES. Fairness perceptions and trust as mediators for transformational and transactional leadership: A two-sample study. Journal of management. 1999;25(6):897-933.
Inness M, Turner N, Barling J, Stride CB. Transformational leadership and employee safety performance: A within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2010;15(3):279-90. [PubMed]
Kiani F, Khodabakhsh M. The Effect of Transformational Leadership Style of Supervisor on Occupational Injuries: The Mediating Role of Safety Consciousness, Role Overload and Safety-related Events. Knowledgeand Research in Applied Psychology. 2015;16(4):84-95.
Zamanian Z, Zakian S, Jamali M, Kouhnavard B. Relationship between Safety Culture and Job Stress among the Personnel of Telecom Companies. Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2017;4(3):161-66.
Mohammadfam I, Bahrami A, Fatemi F, Golmohammadi R, Mahjub H. Evaluation of the relationship between job stress and unsafe acts with occupational accidents in a vehicle manufacturing plant. Scientific Journal of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. 2008;15(3):60-7.
McGonagle AK, Kath LM. Work-safety tension, perceived risk, and worker injuries: A meso-mediational model. Journal of safety research. 2010;41(6):475-79. [PubMed]
McLain DL, Jarrell KA. The perceived compatibility of safety and production expectations in hazardous occupations. Journal of safety Research. 2007;38(3):299-309. [PubMed]
Morrow SL, McGonagle AK, Dove-Steinkamp ML, Walker CT, Marmet M, Barnes-Farrell JL. Relationships between psychological safety climate facets and safety behavior in the rail industry: A dominance analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010;42(5):1460-67. [PubMed]
Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement. 1970;30(3):607-10. [Scopus]
Kiani F, Khodabakhsh MR. The role of supervisor in effectiveness of safety training session and changing employees' attitudes toward safety issues. Safety promotion and injury prevention (Tehran). 2015; 3(1):49-56.
Rahimi Pordanjani T, Mohamadzade Ebrahimi A. Safety Motivation and Work Pressure as Predictors of Occupational Accidents in the Petrochemical Industry. Health Scope. 2015;4(4):e26492.
Kiani F, Samavatyan H, Pourabdian S, Jafari E. Predictive power of incidents reporting rate and its dimensions by Job Stress among Workers' Isfahan Steel Company. Iranian journal of public health. 2011;40(3):105-12. [PubMed]
Rahimi Pordanjani T, Mohamadzade Ebrahimi A. Safety self-efficacy and self-regulation predictors' employee's occupational accidents in an industrial company. Occupational Medicine Quarterly Journal 2015;7(3):1-10.
Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of occupational health psychology. 2000;5(3):347-58. [PubMed]
Hofmann DA, Jacobs R, Landy F. High reliability process industries: Individual, micro, and macro organizational influences on safety performance. Journal of safety research. 1995;26(3):131-49. [Scopus]
Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP. Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange. Journal of applied psychology. 1999;84(2):286-96. [Scopus]
Hofmann DA, Stetzer A. A cross‐level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents. Personnel Psychology. 1996;49(2):307-39. [Scopus]
Mullen J. Investigating factors that influence individual safety behavior at work. Journal of safety research. 2004;35(3):275-85. [PubMed]
Vinodkumar M, Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010;42(6):2082-93. [PubMed]
Zhu CJ, Fan D, Fu G, Clissold G. Occupational safety in China: Safety climate and its influence on safety-related behavior. China Information. 2010;24(1):27-59.
- چکیده مشاهده شده: 311 بار
- PDF دانلود شده: 183 بار