ويژگيهاي روانسنجي مقياس قرباني هارتر در دانشآموزان مدارس متوسطه
ارتقای ایمنی و پیشگیری از مصدومیت ها,
دوره 4 شماره 4 (2016),
9 April 2017
,
صفحه 207-216
https://doi.org/10.22037/meipm.v4i4.16728
چکیده
سابقه و هدف: قرباني شدن يکي از خشونتهاي رايج در جوامع عنوان شده که با خودکشي دانشآموزان رابطه داشته و باعث آسيبهاي جدي در فرايند تحصيل ميشود. هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسي ويژگيهاي روانسنجي مقياس قرباني هارتر در دانشآموزان مدارس متوسطه بود.
روش بررسي: پژوهش توصيفي و از نوع مطالعات همبستگي بود. 400 دانشآموز از بين کليه دانشآموزان دختر و پسر مدارس متوسطه شهر قم در سال تحصيلي 95-1394 در مطالعه شرکت داشتند که با استفاده از روش نمونهگيري خوشهاي چندمرحلهاي انتخاب شدند. همه آنها مقياس قرباني هارتر و پرسشنامه بهزيستي ذهني را تکميل کردند. تحليل عاملي اکتشافي، تحليل عاملي تأييدي و تحليل اعتبار به روش آلفاي کرونباخ اجرا شد. همچنين، از مدل ساميجيما براي برازندگي دادهها و تحليل استفاده شد.
يافتهها: يافتهها نشان داد مدل تک عاملي از برازش مناسبي برخوردار است. آلفاي کرونباخ براي کل مقياس 78/0، براي دختران 66/0 و براي پسران 85/0 به دست آمد. همچنين، شواهد روايي نشان داد که قرباني شدن با بهزيستي ذهني 16/0-، نمره انضباط 18/0- و پيشرفت تحصيلي 30/0- رابطه معنيداري دارد (01/0≤p). بين دختران و پسران تفاوت معنيداري در ميزان قرباني شدن وجود نداشت. يافتههاي مدل سيمجيما برازندگي مناسبي داشت و تابع آگاهي آزمون در دامنه 7/0- تا 2/2+ قرار داشت.
نتيجهگيري: نسخه فارسي پرسشنامه قرباني هارتر در جامعه دانشآموزان از خصوصيات روانسنجي قابل قبولي برخوردار است و ميتوان از آن بهعنوان ابزاري معتبر در پژوهشهاي روانشناختي استفاده کرد.
How to cite this article:
Akbari Balootbangan A, Talepasand S, Mohammad Rezaei A, Rahimian Boogar. Psychometric Properties of Harter’s Victimization Scale in Middle Schools Students. J Saf Promot Inj Prev. 2016; 4(4):207-16.
- مقياس قرباني، قرباني هارتر، رواسازي، اعتبار.
ارجاع به مقاله
مراجع
Goodyer IM, Croudace T, Dunn V, Herbert J, Jones PB. Cohort profile: risk patterns and processes for psychopathology emerging during adolescence: the ROOTS project.. International J Epidemiol. 2010;39(2):361-9. [Pubmed]
Olweus D. Bully/victim problems among school children: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Pepler DJ, Rubin KH, editors: Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale; 1991.
Rigby K, Slee PT. Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes to victims. Journal of Social Psychology. 1991;15(3):615-27. [Pubmed]
Wang J, Iannotti R, Nansel T. School Bullying Among Adolescents in the United States: Physical, Verbal, Relational, and Cyber. J of Adol Health. 2009;45(2):368-75. [Pubmed]
Olweus D. Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do.: Blackwell, Oxford; 1993.
Leymann H. Mobbing: Psychoterror am Arbeitsplatz und wie man sich dagegen wehren kann. [Mobbing: Terrorization at work—and how to ward it off]. Rowohlt, Reinbek. 1993.
Georgiou SN. Bullying and victimization at school: The role of mothers. British J of Educational Psychology. 2008;78(1):109-25. [Pubmed]
Gasteiger Klicpera B, Klicpera C. Viktimisierung durch Gleichaltrige als Entwicklungsrisik [Victimization by peers as a developmental risk factor]. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother 2001;29(2):99-111. [Pubmed]
Rigby K. The relationship between reported health and involvement in bully/victim problems among male and female secondary school children. J Health Psychol. 1998;3(1):465-76.
Grills AE, Ollendick TH. Peer-victimization, global self-worth, and anxiety in middle school children. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2002;31(1):59-68. [Pubmed]
Camodeca M, Goossens FA, Meerum Terwogt M, Schuengel S. Bullying and victimization among school-age children: stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. social development. 2002;11(2):332-45. [Scopus]
Hanish LD, Guerra NG. A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. developmental Psychopathol. 2002;14(2):69-89. [Pubmed]
Troop-Gordon W, Ladd GW. Trajectories of peer victimization and perceptions of the self and schoolmates: precursors to internalizing and externalizing problems. child development. 2005;76(5):1072-91. [Pubmed]
Sawyer JL, Mishna F, Pepler D, Wiener J. The missing voice: Parents' perspectives of bullying. Children and Youth Services Review. 2011;33(2):1795-803.
Jimerson SR, Furlong MJ. Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006.
Ahmed E, Braithwaite V. Bullying and victimization: Cause for concern for both families and schools. Social Psychology of Education. 2004;7(1):35-54.
Ok S, Aslan S. The school bullying and perceived parental style in adolescents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;5:536-40.
Craig WM, Pepler D, Atlas R. Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International. 2000;21(1):22-36.
Storch EA, Masia-Warner C. The relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescent females. Journal of adolescence. 2004;27(3):351-62.
Neary A, Joseph S. Peer victimization and its relationship to self-concept and depression among schoolgirls. Personality and Individual Differences. 1994;16(1):183-6.
Swearer SM, Espelage DL, Vaillancourt T, Hymel S. What can be done about school bullying? Linking research to educational practice. Educational Researcher. 2010;39(1):38-47.
Olweus D. A profile of bullying at school. Educational leadership. 2003;60(6):12-7.
Whitney I, Nabuzoka D ,Smith PK. Bullying in schools: Mainstream and special needs. Support for learning. 1992;7(1):3-7.
Atik G. Assessment of school bullying in Turkey: a critical review of self-report instruments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;15(2):3232-8.
Crick N. The role of relational aggression, overt aggression, and prosocial behavior in the prediction of children’s future social adjustment. Child development. 1996;67(2):2317-27.
Harter S. The Self-perception Profile for Children: Revision of the Perceived Competence Scale for Children: Manual Denver, CO: University of Denver; 1985.
Austin S, Joseph S. Assessment of bully/victim problems in 8 to 11 yearolds. Briti Jornal of Educational Psychology. 1996;66(2):447-56.
Ponzo M. Does bullying reduce educational achievement? An evaluation using matching estimators. Journal of Policy Modeling. 2013;35(6):1057-78.
Akbari Balootbangan A , Talepasand S. Psychometric properties of Harter’s bullying scale in primary schools of Semnan. Scientific Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2014;12(4):13-27.
Pekel N. Akran zorbalıgı grupları arasında sosyometrik başarı durumlarının incelenmesi. Unpublished master’s thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara; 2004.
Baldry AC, Farrington DP. Bullies and delinquents: Personal characteristics and parental styles. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2000;10(1):17-31.
Vreeman RC, Carroll AE. A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2007;161(1):78-88.
Renshaw TL, Long A, Cook CR. Assessing Adolescents’ Positive Psychological Functioning at School: Development and Validation of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire. Amer Psychol Ass. 2014;10(3):1-19.
Akbari Balootbangan A, Najafi M, Babaee J. The Factorial Structure of the Student Subjective Well-being Questionnaire (SSWQ) Secondary Schools in Qom City. Inedited. 2015.
Joreskog K, Sorbom D. LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software Inc; 2003.
Berkler S. Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: cause for concern. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(3):260-73.
Baker JG, Rounds JB , Zevon MAA. comparison of Graded Response and Rasch Partial Credit Models with Subjective Well-being. Journal Educational behavior stat. 2000;25(3):253-70.
Siyahhan Sinem O, Aricak T, Cayirdag-Acar N. The relation between bullying, victimization, and adolescents' level of hopelessness. Journal of adolescence 2012;35(4):1053-9.
Boulton MJ, Smith PK, Cowie H. Short-term longitudinal relationships between children’s peer victimization/bullying experiences and self-perceptions evidence for reciprocity. School Psychology International. 2010;31(3):296-311.
Callaghan S, Joseph S. Selfconcept and peer victimisation among schoolchildren. Personality and Individual Differences. 1995;18(2):161-3.
Wei H, Huang C. Reviewing school bullying research: empirical findings and methodical considerations. Nttu Edu research J. 2005;16(1):69-112.
Nansel TR, Haynie DL, Simonsmorton BG. The association of bullying and victimization with middle school adjustment. Journal of Applied School Psychology. 2003;19(2):45-61.
You S, Furlong MJ, Felix E, Sharkey JD, Tanigawa D, Green JG. Relations among school connectedness, hope, life satisfaction, and bully victimization. Psychology in the Schools. 2008;45(5):446-60.
Liu J, Bullock A, Coplan RJ. Predictive Relations between Peer Victimization and Academic Achievement in Chinese Children. School Psychology Quarterly. 2014;29(1):89-98.
Bond L, Carlin JB, Thomas L, Rubin K, Patton G. Does bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagers. BMJ. 2001;323(7311):480-4.
Eweniyi G, Adeoye AO, Ayodele KO, Adebayo IR. The Effectiveness of Two Psycho-Social Behavioural Interventions on Adolescents’ Bullying Behaviour among Nigerian Adolescents. J of Studies in Social Sciences. 2013;4(2):246-61.
- چکیده مشاهده شده: 523 بار
- PDF دانلود شده: 274 بار