Electronic Service and E-Justice in Iranian Law
Tārīkh-i pizishkī i.e., Medical History,
Vol. 12 No. 00 (1399),
13 September 2020
,
Page 179-193
https://doi.org/10.22037/mhj.v12i1.31781
Abstract
Background and Aim: With the Introduction of Technology in the Legal system of Different Countries, Including Iran, Various Advances Have Been Made, Including in the Fields of Litigation and Electronic Service. In the Meantime, Electronic Service as one of the Components of a Fair Trial Should be Considered. The Need to Use Electronic Devices in the Process of Litigation and Service is an Undeniable Issue. This Necessity is Felt More in the Current Situation of the Society and the Judiciary has Used These Conditions as a Suitable Opportunity to Advance its Goals in the Field of Litigation and Electronic Service.
Materials and Methods: In This Study, Which has Been Collected by Analytical-Descriptive Method and Using Library Tools, First, the Process of Electronic Service in the Iranian and Common Law Legal Systems Has Been Examined. In the Next Step, According to the Tools Available to the Courts of Both Legal Systems in the E-Litigation Process, the Effects and Gaps of These Systems Have Been Considered and Discussed.
Findings: In the Field of Electronic Service, in Order to Complete This Great Change in the Iranian Judicial System, This Process Should be Designed for Iranians Abroad and People With Unknown Location and Without an Account. On the Other Hand, the E-Litigation System Does not Have the Ability to Completely and Fundamentally Bypass the Traditional System; Rather, it Must Move Alongside This System and Develop and Improve its Efficiency.
Ethical Considerations In Order to Organize This Research, While Observing the Authenticity of the Texts, Honesty and Fidelity Have Been Observed.
Conclusion: Examining the Common Law System in the United States and the United Kingdom, We Find that the Principle of Optionality Applies to Electronic Service and Courts Use Electronic Service in the Case of Consent, as Well as in Cases Where They are Frustrated by Traditional Means; This Indicates that Electronic Service has Come to the Aid of the Traditional System With the Help of the Judicial System, and that the Courts Should not Approach the Elimination of Traditional Methods.
Please cite this article as: Abhari H, Mohammadi S, Adeli Far E. Electronic Service and E-Justice in Iranian Law. Med Hist J, Special Issue on the History of Islam and Iran 2020; 179-193.
- E-Justice; Electronic Service; Common Law; Iranian Law
How to Cite
References
Zarkalam S. Dadrasi Electronic Zarourat-Ha Elzamat Chalesh-Ha Amouzeh-Haye Hoghoughi. Majalehe Daneshgah Olomensani razavi 2012; 3: 50, 129, 131.
Mohseni H. Chalesh-Haye Eblagh Sonati Electronic Sabeghe va Zaban. Faslname Motale'at Hoghough Khososi 2017; 48: 321-348.
Eftekhar-Jahromi G, Elsan M. Aiine Dadrasi Madani 2. 1th. Tehran: Mizan Publication; 2017. p. 30-75.
Karimi A. Aiine Dadrasi Madani. 1th. Tehran: Majd Publication; 2007. p. 104, 107.
Bahrami B. Aiine Dadrasi Madani 1 and 2. 11th. Tehran: Negah bine publication; 2009. p. 95.
Esma'Ili A, Pour-Ghahramani B. Chalesh-Haye Fararouye Dadrasi Electronic Dar Iran. Faslname Didgah-Haye Hoghough Ghazaii 2019; 87: p. 37.
Abhari H. Aiine dadrasi Madani 2 Jaryan Dadresi Az Aghaz Ta Payan. 1th. Mazandaran: Mazandaran University Publication; 2012. p. 411, 80, 16.
Mohseni H, Rezaii-Nejad H. Dadgostari Va Pishraft Fannavari Etela'at Va Ertebatat. Majalehe Motale'at Hoghoughi Daneshgah Shiraz 2012; 2-4: 117, 142.
http://www.pacer.gov. Review in: 2020/03/05.
http://www.ncmd.uscourts.gov. Review in: 2020/03/05.
http://opencourt.us. Review in: 2020/03/05.
Volonio L. Electronic Evidence and Computer Forensice Communication Of The Association For Information System. 1th. Milan: Technology Press; 2003. p. 12.
Safari M. Eblaghe Electronici. 1 th. Tehran; Mizan Publication; 2015. p. 86.
Ponte L. The Michigan Cyber Court A Bold Experiment In The Development. 1th. North Carolina: Virtual Courthouse Journal of Law & Technology Publication; 2002. Vol 4. p. 65.
www.dmlp.org. Review in: 2020/03/05.
Zadeh-Hossein-Olyaii Z, Ahmadi A. Dadrasi Electronic Dar Hoghoughe Iran Ahdaf Mabani Vizhegi-Ha. Faslname Tahghighate Hoghoughe Khosousi va Keyfari 2018; 35: 118.
Abdollah Shams. Aien Dadresi Madani 2. 7th. Tehran: Mizan publication; 2007. p. 24.
Madani SJD. Aiine Dadrasi Madani 2. 1th. Tehran: Daneshgah Melli Iran publication; 1979. p. 335.
Zera'at A. Qhanoun Aiine Dadrasi Madani Dar Nazme Konouni. 3th. Tehran: Khate Sevom publication; 2006. p. 217.
Farach F. The Electronic Court Room and The Paperless Trail. san diego: American bar association; 2006. p. 16.
Farrel H. Constructing The International Foundations Of E-commerce The EU-US Safe Harbor Arrangement, Journal Of International Organization; 2003. vol 57. p. 277-307.
Hill J. Corporate Criminal Liability In Australia An Evolving Corporate Governance Technique. Journal Of Business Law 2003; 1: 34.
Hashemi SR, Yousefi Y. Baresi Ta'sir Mekanizeh Shodan System Ghazaii Bar Rezayat Shoghlie Karkonan va Rezayat-Mandi Arbabrojou' Dar Dadgostari Kol Ostan Kermanshah. Majalehe Hoghoughi Dadgostari 2015; 92: p. 193, 211.
Mehrafshan A. Residegi Be Eteham Az Tarigh Video Conference. Majalehe Motale'at Hoghoughi Daneshgah Shiraz 2014; 6: 168.
www.attornyygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/English/ aboat/artcl/csd-courts.php. Review in: 2020/03/05
Kawano M. Electronic Technology and Civil Procedure Applicability Of Electronic Technology In The Course Of Civil Procedure. lecture 2010 IAPL conference; 1: 3.
Velicogna M, Ng GY. Legitimacy and Internet In The Judiciary A Lesson From The Italian Courts’ Websites Experience. International Journal Of Law and Information Technology 2006; 14: 145.
Watney M. Admissibilitty Of Electronic Evidece In Criminal Proceeding An Outline of the South Africa Legal Position. Journal of Informetion law and Technology 2009; 1: 1.
Galves C, Galves C. Ensuring The Admissibility Of Electronic Forensic Evidence and Enhancing Its Probative Value at Trial American Bar Association Criminal Justice Magazine 2007; 1: 9. (available at www.abanet.org.crimjust/cjimag/19-1/electronic.html-9)
Solovy JS, Byman RL. Don’t Let Your E-evidence Get Trashed. legal Technology 2007; 1: 1.
Febri M. Judicial Electronic Data Interchange In Europe Applications Policies and Trends. 1th. Italy: university of bologna research centre for judicial studies; 2003. p. 16.
Burrel WD, Gable RS. From B.F.Skinner to Spiderman to Martha Stewart The Past-Present and Future Of Electronic Monitoring Of Offender Probation parole 2008; 46: 101.
Nellis M, Beyens K, Kaminski D. Electronically Punishment International and Critical Perspective. London / New York: Routledge Press; 2013. p. 25.
Renzema M, Mayo-Wilson E. Can Electronic Monitoring Reduce Crime For Moderate To High Risk Offenders. J Exp Criminal 2005; 2: 215.
- Abstract Viewed: 898 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 318 times