Responsibility of effective factors in causing injuries caused by robotic surgeries
Medical Figh,
Vol. 15 No. 45 (1402),
29 August 2023
,
Page 1-14
https://doi.org/10.22037/mfj.v15i45.42495
Abstract
Background and Aim: Artificial intelligence technology is one of the wonderful achievements in medical engineering sciences. It allows surgeons to perform many types of complex procedures with less invasiveness and necessary precision than is possible with conventional techniques. In contemporary world, while robotic surgery using artificial intelligence has brought unmatched benefits to humanity; but in some cases, it makes strategic mistakes and causes serious injuries to the patients. The current research aims to investigate the responsibility of the devices and factors involved in intelligent robotic surgeries from the perspective of jurists.
Materials and Methods: This research is organized based on the descriptive-analytical method and by referring to library sources through data collection.
Conclusion: The findings show that the use of artificial intelligence for therapeutic purposes in robotic surgeries is currently not established in medical practice. It is still in its initial stages and its risks are sometimes hidden for experts. Since following the recommendations of artificial intelligence in this situation, is dangerous for patients; therefore, it will not disclaim responsibility for the causes and factors related to the intelligent surgeon robot. As a result, the researchers have considered the viewpoints of attributing responsibility due to prior and late, as well as the viewpoint of strong cause and the viewpoint of conventional cause, to be ineffective in this regard, and they emphasize that the viewpoint of equal responsibility in terms of strict supervision and the establishment of new laws and criteria such as determining the effect of devices on the damages for the patient, as well as the mandatory insurance plan and the compensation fund along with the necessary warning mechanisms, is justified as a preferred opinion in compensating possible damages caused by robotic surgeries.
- Jurisprudence, Responsibility, Artificial intelligence,Robotic surgery
How to Cite
References
Ebrahimi, A. "Application of Artificial Intelligence in Legal Affairs". Law Study Quarterly. 2023(1402), 35. [In Persian]
Jaʿfarnijᾱd Qumī, ʿA. Hūsh Maşnūʿī (Rahyāftī Nuwīn). Np.ʿUlūm Rāyānihī. 2016 (1386), 117. [In Persian]
Takhshīd, Z. Muqaddamih ī Bar Chālishhāyi Hūsh Maşnūʿī Dar Ḥuzih Masʾūlīyyat Madanī. Np. Tehran University. 2021(1400). 38. [In Persian]
Şᾱdūghī F, Kārburd Sīstimhāyi Hūsh Maşnūʿī Dar Taşmīmgīrīhāyi Pizishkī. Npn. 2019 (1390). 3. [In Persian]
Amadi Lashki, R. “Applīcation of Artīficial Intelligence in Medīcal Science”. The 8th International Conference on Electrical, computer and mechanical engineering. 2022 (1401). [In Persian]
Bichami, A. “Examining The Advantages And Dīsadvantages Of The Robotīc Surgery System”. Mashad: Fourth Conference on Information Technology and Health Promotion with a focus on smart health, 2021 (1400). [In Persian]
Zahedifar, M. “Expert System For Dīagnosīng Heart Dīsease Usīng Artīfīcīal Intelligence Method”. New Researches of Engīneerīng Sciences. 2022 (1401), 5. [In Persian]
Zandiyeh, M. “Robotic Surgery: An Evolution In Modern Surgīcal Technīques”. two quarterly journals of the faculty of nursīng and midwifery of Gīlan province. 2009 (1388). 61. [In Persian]
Hosseini, SA. “Survey of robotic surgery method in Iran”. the fīrst national conference on teaching and research challenges in the operatīng room. 2018 (1397) [In Persian]
Hikmatniya, M. "Civil liability arising from the productīon of robots based on autonomous artificial intelligence”. Islamīc Law Journᾱl. 2018 (1397). 60. [In Persian]
Arzanian N, Izadi Z. "legal review of granting personalīty to robots from the perspectīve of Islamīc Republīc of Iran Laws”. Vakil Dafange magazine. 2018 (1397). 19. [In Persian].
Valipour, A. "The civil responsibility of public artificial intelligence caused by causing damage to civil rights”. Andīsheh al-Hawti publication. 2021 (1400). 6. [In Persian]
Vatheghi, M. "Feasibility of granting legal personalīty to intelligent robots based on the European Union's resolution”. Majles and Strategy Quarterly. 2019(1399). 103. [In Persian]
Ḥillī, Ḥ. Qawāʿid al-Aḥkām Fī Sharḥ al-Ḥalāl Wa al-Ḥarām. Qum: Nashr Islāmī. 1998(1419). 3: 658. [In Arabic]
Shahīd Thānī, Z. Masālik al-Afhām. Qum: Dār al-Maʿārif al-Islāmīyyat. 1995(1416). 15:381 [In Arabic].
Najafī, M. Jawāhir al-Kalām. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyyat. 1943(1362). 43: 146. [In Arabic].
Khomeini, SR, Taḥrīr al-Wasīlat. Najaf: Maṭabaʿat al-Ādāb. 2013 (1434). 2:193& 512. [In Ὰrabic].
Fāḍil Hindī, BM. Kashf al-Lithām. Qum: Marʿashī Najafī. 1948(1405). 2: 486. [In Arabic].
Rashtī, MḤ. al-Ghaşb. Np. Chāp Sangī. Nd. 41, [In Ὰrabic].
Kātūzīyān, N. Ilzāmhāyi Khārij Az Qarārdād. Tehran: Tehran Universiy. 2006(1385). 473. [In Persian].
Kᾱshif al-Ghiṭā, MH. Taḥrīr al-Majallah. al-Majmaʿ al-ʿAālamī lil-Taqrīb Bayn al-Mdhāhib al-Islāmīyyat. 2004(1425). 3: 183. [In Arabic].
Marāghī, SMʿA. al-ʿAnāwīn. Nashr Islāmī. 2004(1425), 2: 435. [In Persian]3
Bᾱrīklū, ʿA. Masʾūlīyyat Madanī. Tehran: Mīzān. 2006(1385). 127. [In Persian]
Khomeini, SR. Taḥrīr al-Wasīlat. Najaf. Npn. 1970(1390). 2: 193. [In Arabic].
Makārim Shīrāzī, N. al-Qawāʿid al-Fiqhīyyat. Qum: ʿAlī Ibn Abī Ṭālib. 2004 (1425). 2:180. [In Arabic]
Muḥaqqiq Thānī, ʿA. Jāmiʿ al-Maqāşid Fī Sharc al- Qawāʿid. Qum: Āl al-Bayt. 1988(1410). 6: 207. [In Arabic].
[14]; 2: 221. [In Arabic]
Gul Gulbᾱghī, SA. Darāmadī Bar ʿUrf. Qum: Daftar Tablīghāt Islāmī Ḥuzat ʿIlmīyyat Qum. 1999(1378). 13. [In Persian]
MuḤaqiq Ḥillī, A. Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām. Tehran: MaṬbiʿat al-ʿIlmīyyat. 1983(1403). 4:160. [In Arabic]
Khoei, SA. Mabānī Takmilat al-Minhāj. Qum: Iḥyāʾ Āthār al-Imām al- Khūʾī. 2017(1438). 2: 260. [In Arabic].
- Abstract Viewed: 375 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 149 times