مرکز تحقیقات اخلاق و حقوق پزشکی - دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Medical Figh

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Submissions
    • How to Submit Your Manuscript
    • Editorial Team
    • Transcription & Transliteration Guide
    • Style Sheet
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • Forms
    • Commitment Form
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 16 No. 46 (1403): Medical Fighh Journal 2024; 16 (46)
  4. Research Article

Vol. 16 No. 46 (1403)

May 2024

The dispute between frozen embryo’s parents in implantation in the mother's womb in Iranian legal system

  • Nasibe Hashemi Nejad
  • maryam sadat mohaghegh damad

Medical Figh, Vol. 16 No. 46 (1403), 18 May 2024 , Page 1-16
https://doi.org/10.22037/mfj.v16i46.41984 Published: 2024-06-24 — Updated on 2025-04-11

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Versions
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Background and Aim: Infertility is one of the most important problems of human societies, and medical knowledge has been able to solve this problem to some extent due to many advances. One of the most important achievements is embryo freezing that was created from the in vitro fertilization of the parents’ germ cells in extra uterine conditions and with a medical process. Embryo freezing and storage in freezing banks has faced many issues, one of which is legal challenges. The purpose of this research is to investigate the disagreement of parents in choosing a uterus for implantation of a frozen embryo in Iranian legal system.

Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical research aims to qualitatively analyse the verses of the Holy Quran and the opinions of lawyers, jurists and doctors regarding the differences between the parents’ frozen embryo in implantation in the mother's and non-mother's wombs in Iranian legal system by referring to documents and library resources.

Conclusion: Based on the studies on the difference in the place of embryo implantation and different views regarding the determination of the authority’s the frozen embryo, it was determined that the couple (the owners of the gamete and the two forming factors of the embryo) are jointly authority. By stating the types of relationship between parents and the fetus, it was explained that there is a new relationship between them, that is, the relationship of dominion and possession of trust and exclusive right. Considering the right to the physical and mental health of the fetus, the right to life, the right to implant in the mother's womb, the psychological effects of implantation in the mother's womb on the fetus, the place of the womb (the interest of the fetus) and the rules of harmlessness and non-harmful in assuming fetus’ or mother’s health and not health at the implantation site, a womb is chosen that is a stable place for the fetus and ensures its health and protection according to the verses of the Holy Quran. In addition, it was found that a frozen embryo is not property, so it cannot be inherited.

Keywords:
  • Frozen embryo, Implantation, Right to health, Right to life, Iranian legal system
  • 2025-04-11 (2)
  • 2024-06-24 (1)
  • pdf (فارسی)

How to Cite

Hashemi Nejad, N., & mohaghegh damad, maryam sadat. (2025). The dispute between frozen embryo’s parents in implantation in the mother’s womb in Iranian legal system. Medical Figh, 16(46), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22037/mfj.v16i46.41984 (Original work published June 24, 2024)
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Noor Ahmadi, A, Tolaei A, Mahdavi Keni S. “Laboratory Embryo Without a Owner from the Perspective of Imami Jurisprudence”. Imam Sadiq University (AS). 2019(1398). 48 & 57 & 92.

[In Persian]

Mahmoudian N, Ayati SMR, Abbasi M. “Jurisprudence-legal relationship of gamete freezing applicants with frozen gametes available in freezing banks”. Journal of Jurisprudential Principles of Islamic Law. 2017(1396). 20. [In Persian]

Raji S, Haeri M, Rahmani Manshadi H. “The legal relationship of the owners of frozen embryos with it”. Scientific Research Journal of Medical Jurisprudence. 2016(1394). 30 & 31. [In Persian]

Taqavi N, Omani Samani R, Asdinejad SM. “investigation of the nature of frozen embryos from the point of view of jurisprudence, ethics and law”. Quarterly Journal of Medical Jurisprudence. 2015(1394). 26-27: 39-66. [In Persian]

Taqavi N, Omani Samani R, Asdinejad SM. “Review of the criticisms on the embryo freezing contract and its legal nature explanation”. Iranian Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2015(1394). 22(4): 299-314. [In Persian]

Abbasi M, Parsa E. “Legal status of frozen embryos”. Medical Law Quarterly. 2015(1394). 36:37-54 [In Persian]

Raji, SH. “Embryo freezing from the perspective of Imamiyya jurisprudence and Iranian law”. Thesis of Master of Theology and Islamic Studies - Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Yazd University. 2015(1393). 1-36. [In Persian]

Şāḥib Ibn ʿIbād, I. al-Muḥīṭ fī al-Lughat. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kitāb. 1993(1414). 409. [In Arabic]

Rāghib Işfahānī, Ḥ. Mufradāt Alfāẓ al-Qurʾān. Lebanon: Dār al-ʿAlam. 1992(1412). 204&284. [In Arabic].

Ibn Manẓūr, M. Lisān al- ʿArab. Beirut: Dār al-Şādir. 1994 (1414). 93&492&579&24&25& 109&413. [In Arabic]

Bāqirī, T. Raḥim Jāyguzīn Dar Darmān Nābārwarī Az Dīdgāh Pizishkī, Fiqhī Wa Ḥuqūqī. Tehran: Javadane. 2013(1391). 7& 8& 26& 25& 33-35& 38& 54. [In Persian]

Nāyibzādih, A. Barrisī Ḥuqūqī Rawishhāyi Jadīd Tulīd Mithl Maşnūʿī. Tehran: Majd. 2000(1380). 9&28&277. [In Persian]

Muʿīn, M. Farhang Muʿīn. Tehran: Adnā. 2002(1381). 200 & 605. [In Persian]

Whittingham, D.G. “Survival of mouse embryos after freezing and thawing”. Nature. 1971(1349). 223(5315): 125 – 126. [In English]

Fayyūmī, A. alMişbāḥ al-Munīr Fī Gharīb al-Sharḥ al-Kabīr. Np: Dār al-Rāḍī. 1981(1402). 2:683. [In Arabic]

Ṭurayḥī, F. Majmaʿ al-Baḥrayn. Tehran: Maktabat al-Murtaḍawīyyat. 1995(1416). 167. [In Arabic]

Juharī, I. al-Şiḥāḥ Tāj al-Lughat Wa Şiḥāḥ al-ʿArabīyyat. 4th ed. Beirut: Dār al-ʿIlm lil-Malāʾīn. 1987(1407). 1037. [In Arabic]

Ibn Fāris, A. Muʿjam Maqāʾīs al-Lughat. Qum: al-Nashr al-Islāmī al-Tābiʿat li-Jimāʿat al-Mudarrisīn Fī Ḥuzat ʿIlmīyyat Qum. Nd. 152. [In Arabic]

Khoei, AQ. Mişbāḥ al-Fiqāhat (Muʿāmilāt). Edited by: Muhammad Ali Tawhidi. Qum: Maktabat al-Dāwarī. 1999 (1420). 235. [In Arabic]

Rajaei, F. “Jurisprudential examination of the right of appropriation”. Journal of Islamic Law. 2013(1391). 39:141-165. [In Persian]

Muḥaqqiq Ḥillī, J. al-Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām Fī Masāʾil al-Ḥalāl Wa al-Ḥarām. Trans: Hosseini Shirazi, SS. 2nd ed. Tehran: Istiqlāl.1988 (1409). 134. [In Arabic]

Ḥillī, Ḥ. Qawāʿid al-Aḥkām Fī Maʿrifat al-Ḥalāl Wa al-Ḥarām. Qum: al-Nashr al-Islāmī al-Tābiʿat li-Jimāʿat al-Mudarrisīn Fī Ḥuzat ʿIlmīyyat Qum.1993 (1413). 345. [In Arabic]

Jaʿfarī Langirūdī, MJ. Ḥuqūq Mālikīyyat. Tehran: Ganj Dānish. 1994(1373). 103. [In persian]

Sharma A, Kumar P. “Understanding implantation window, a crucial phenomenon”. Hum Reprod Sci. 2012(1391). 5(1):2-6. [In English]

Mahmoudzadeh Azbari, MJ. “Jurisprudential-legal examination of the right to life of the fetus”. Payam Noor University. 2009(1388). 15 & 16. [In Persian].

Mehrgan, A. “Abortion and human rights in the mirror of international law”. Fertility and Infertility Quarterly. 2014(1393). 4(6):410-440[In Persian].

Jawādī Āmulī, ʿA. Falsafih Ḥuqūq Bashar. Qum: Isrā. 1999(1377). 176. [In Persian]

ʿAllāmih Ṭabāṭabāyī, SM. Tarjumih Tafsīr al-Mīzān. Qum: Daftar Intishārāt Islāmī. 2001(1380). 316& 194& 32& 24& 363. [In Persian].

Muʾmin, M. Kalimāt al-Sadīdat. Qum: Nashr Islāmī. 1995(1415). 98 & 99. [In Arabic]

Sublett MF. “Frozen Embryos: What Are They and How Should the Law Treat Them”. Law Journals. 1990(1368). 38(4):585-616. [In English]

Khamenei, SʿA. 1382. Ajwabat al- ʾIstiftāʾāt. Tehran: Hudā. 1275. [In Persian]

ʿUmīd, H. Ihdāyi Janīn Dar Qawānīn Irān. Tehran: Mīzān websit. Available from: http:// lawadl-hami.blogfa.com/post/285

Hatmi, I. "The situation of the frozen fetus in the rights of the subject and the point of view of the jurists." Judicial Law Journal. 2017(1395). 129:21-30. [In Persian]

Petralia, S. “Resolving Dispute over Excess Embryo through the Confines of Property and Contract law”. Journal of Law and Health. 2002 (1381). (1):103-136. [In English]

Taqavi, N. "Contract of Embryo and Gamete Freezing and Its Effects". Master's Thesis of Private Law, Gilan University. 2014(1392).35. [In Persian]

Ṭabāṭabāyī, SM. al-Mīzān f ī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Qum: Aʿlamī. 1984(1405). 121. [In Arabic]

Rosendrof, David L. “Homelessness and the uses of theory: An Analysis of Economic and Personality Theories of property in the content of voting Rights and sauattingRight”. University of Miami Law Review. [In English]

Taqavi N, Asadinejad M, Omani Samani R, Rostami A. Determining the type of relationship between laboratory embryos and couples and determining their legal guardian." Journal of Women, Obstetrics and Fertility. 2016(1394). 151:20-30. [In Persian]

Makārim Shīrāzī, N. Tafsīr Nimūnih. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyyat. 1992 (1371). 140 & 142. [In Persian]

A collection of authors. Rawishhāyi Nuwīn Tulīd Mithl Insān Az Dīdgāh Fiqh Wa Ḥuqūq. Tehran: Samt. 2002(1380). 136 & 147-175. [In Persian]

Nazali M, Aiti SMR, Abbasi M. "Legal-legal relationship of gamete freezing applicants with frozen gametes available in freezing banks." Journal of Jurisprudential Principles of Islamic Law. 2016(1395). 20. [In Persian].

Jawādī Āmulī, ʿA. Ḥaq Wa Taklīf Dar Islām. Qum: Isrā. 2007(1385). 96. [In Persian]

Bejnvardi SM, Kazemi Afshar H. “Treatment of body parts in Iranian law with an approach to Imam Khomeini's jurisprudential opinions”. Matin Research Journal. 2016(1395). 38:37-52. [In Persian].

Shirovi, M. “The need to preserve the biological dignity of the embryo in the laboratory in the light of bioethical documents”. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2019(1397) .11:135-167. [In Persian]

Najaf ī, M. Jawāhir al-Kalām. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. 1983(1404). 386. [In Arabic]

Lārī, SA. Taʿlīqat ʿAlā al-Makāsib. Qum: al-Maʿārif Islāmī. 1997(1418). 83&84. [In Arabic]

Qanadi, N. “The rights of children born from artificial insemination”. Tabriz University. 2018(1397). 124. [In Persian]

Fiyḍ Allāhī, N. Ihdāyi Janīn Wa Dīgar Rawishhāyi Bārwarī Kumakī Dar Ḥuqūq Irān. 2009(1389). 169 [In Persian]

Ṭabarsī, Ḥ. Mustadrak al-Wasāʿil. Beirut: Āl al-Bayt. 1987(1408). 389. [In Arabic]

Khomeini, R. Makāsib al-Muḥarramat. Qum: Nashr Wa Tanẓīm Āthār Imām Khomeini. 1994 (1415). 42&242. [In Arabic]

A collection of authors. Siqṭ Janīn. Tehran: Samt. 2010(1388). 320-327. [In Persian]

Waẓīrī, M. Ḥuqūq Mutiqābil Kūdak Wa Walī Dar Islām. Tehran: Amīr Kabīr. 2004(1384). 70& 83-84. [In Persian]

Faramarizi Razini, Fatemeh. 2015. “Comparative study of the rights of laboratory embryos in selected Islamic and Western countries”. Doctoral thesis of law, Urmia University. 2015(1393). 63. [In Persian]

Farrokhi, M. "Legal and religious relationship of the child with the owners of the fetus". University of Tehran. 2001(1380). 8 & 9. [In Persian]

Maḥalātī, SH. Barrisī Khalaʾhāyi Qānūnī Ḥuqūq Kūdak. Np. Shurā Farhangī Ijtimāʿī Zanān wa Khaniwādih. 2005(1384). 23. [In Persian].

  • Abstract Viewed: 334 times
  • pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 78 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors

Language

  • فارسی
  • English
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact
Powered by OJSPlus