Correlation between the Thickness and Anterior-Posterior Width of the Masseter Muscle in Ultrasonography with the Intermolar Width in Maxilla and Mandible
Journal of Dental School,
Vol. 43 No. 2 (2025),
30 April 2025
,
Page 59-69
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v43i2.46794
Abstract
Objective(s): The interplay between masticatory muscle function and dental arch size holds considerable significance within the discipline of orthodontics. This research endeavored to quantify masseter muscle dimensions via ultrasonography (USG) and subsequently analyze their correlative relationship with dental arch width. Methods: 45 participants were enrolled in this cross sectional study, stratified by gender and age cohorts. Bilateral USG assessments, utilizing a 7.5 MHz linear transducer, were conducted to quantify masseter muscle thickness and anterior-posterior (AP) width during both relaxed and clenched states. Intermolar width was determined through direct measurement with a metal caliper on dental casts of the maxillary and mandibular arches. Independent samples t-tests were employed to analyze mean differences between male and female subjects. The association between masseter muscle dimensions (thickness and width) and intermolar width was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient, as appropriate at p<0.05. Results: The study cohort comprised 20 females and 25 males within the age range of 16 to 30 years. Statistically significant sexual dimorphism was observed, with males demonstrating substantially greater masseter muscle thickness and AP width compared to females in both relaxed and clenched states (p < 0.001). Consistent with expectations, males demonstrated statistically significant greater intermolar widths in both the maxilla and mandible (p < 0.001). Across the entire study population, a statistically significant positive correlation was identified between masseter muscle thickness and intermolar width (p < 0.05). Specifically, individuals exhibiting larger masseter muscle dimensions presented with correspondingly increased intermolar widths in both the maxillary and mandibular arches. However, when these variables were stratified by gender or age group, no statistically significant correlations were observed (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:USG is validated as a safe and reproducible technique for the objective measurement of masseter muscle thickness.
- Masseter Muscle
- Dental Arch
- Ultrasound Imaging
- Muscle Anatomy
How to Cite
References
Ciavarella, D, lorusso M, Fanelli C, Cazolla AP, Maci M, Ferrara D, et al. The correlation between mandibular arch shape and vertical skeletal pattern the journal of contemporary dental practice. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 ;59(11): 1926. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111926
Pepicelli A, Woods M, Briggs C. The mandibular muscles and their importance in orthodontics: a contemporary review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(6):774-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.023
Iwasaki M, Hirano H, Motokawa K, Shirobe M, Edahiro A, Ohara Y, et al. Interrelationships among whole-body skeletal muscle mass, masseter muscle mass, oral function, and dentition status in older Japanese adults. BMC Geriatrics. 2021;21(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02552-9
Katsaros C, Berg R, Kiliaridis S. Influence of masticatory muscle function on transverse skull dimensions in the growing rat. J Orofac Orthop. 2002;63(1):5-13. doi: 10.1007/s00056-002-9903-0
Erdil D, Bagis N, Eren H, Camgoz M, Orhan K. The evaluation of the relationship between changes in masseter muscle thickness and tooth clenching habits of bruxism patients treated with botulinum toxin A. J Med Ultrasound. 2022;31(1):22-8. doi: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_51_22
Vasegh Z, Safi Y, Azar MS, Ahsaie MG, Arianezhad SM. Assessment of bony changes in temporomandibular joint in patients using
cone beam computed tomography–a cross sectional study. Head Face Med. 2023;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13005-023-00392-z
Kalluvalappil A, Balan A, Chandrabose TB, Venugopal M, Jacob JE, Ramachandran S. Comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the masseter muscle in patients with and without oral submucous fibrosis. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2023;35:75-81. doi: 10.4103/
jiaomr.jiaomr_337_22
Raadsheer MC, Van Eijden TM, Van Spronsen PH, Van Ginkel FC, Kiliaridis S, Prahl-Andersen B. A comparison of human masseter
muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Oral Biol. 1994;39(12):1079-84. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90061-2
Lee HJ, Choi YJ, Lee KW, Hu KS, Kim ST, Kim HJ. Ultrasonography of the internal architecture of the superficial part of the masseter muscle in vivo. Clin Anat. 2019;32(3):446-52. doi: 10.1002/ca.23337
Odman A, Bresin A, Kiliaridis S. The effect of retraining hypofunctional jaw muscles on the transverse skull dimensions of adult rats. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77(3):184-8. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1531437
Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber TM. Color atlas of dental medicine, Orthodontic-Diagnosis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1994;105(6):613.
Wang M, Wang J, Jin X, Liu D, Bian H, Zhao Y, et al. Impact of occlusal contact pattern on dental stability and oromandibular system after orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):22276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46668-x
Kumar GS, Pillai B. Masseteric Hypertrophy: An Orthodontic Perspective. J Ind Orthod Soc 2012;46(4):233-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1096
Tircoveluri S, Singh JR, Rayapudi N, Karra A, Begum M, Challa P. Correlation of masseter muscle thickness and intermolar width - an ultrasonography study. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(2):28-34.
Park KM, Choi E, Kwak EJ, Kim S, Park W, Jeong JS, et al. The relationship between masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography and facial profile in young Korean adults. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018;48(3):213-21. doi: 10.5624/isd.2018.48.3.213
Biondi K, Lorusso P, Fastuca R, Mangano A, Zecca PA, Bosco M, et al. Evaluation of masseter muscle in different vertical skeletal patterns in growing patients. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2016;17(1):47-52.
Kiliaridis S, Georgiakaki I, Katsaros C. Masseter muscle thickness and maxillary dental arch width. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25(3):259-63. doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.3.259
Rohila AK, Sharma VP, Shrivastav PK, Nagar A, Singh GP. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(6):726-31. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.111247
Parameshwaran V. Masseter Activity, Arch Width and Facial Type. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2010;44(1):91-5. doi: 10.1177/0974909820100115
Sadeghian S. Masseter muscle thickness and dental arch widths. Iran. J. Orthod. 2009;4(1):33-7. doi: 10.22034/ijo.2009.247989
Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23(1):15-23. doi: 10.1093/ejo/23.1.15
Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder J, Nowak A. Arch width changes from 6 weeks to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111(4):401-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)80022-4
Safi Y, Amid R, Vasegh Z, Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M. Anatomical variations in the interforaminal regions of candidates for implant-assisted overdentures: a cross-sectional CBCT analysis. Gen Dent. 2020;68(6):11-6.
Aryanezhad SS, Jafari-Pozve N, Abrishami M, Arianezhad SM. Investigating the anatomy and location of the infraorbital canal in relation to the adjacent structures in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02191-8
Alizad-Rahvar M, Safi Y, Kadkhodazadeh M, Ghomashi MP. Clinical efficacy of intraoral ultrasonography versus transgingival probing for measurement of gingival thickness in different gingival biotypes: a clinical trial. Head Face Med. 2024;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00422-4
- Abstract Viewed: 132 times
- PDF Downloaded: 141 times