Microleakage of Two Composite Resin Materials in Restored Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study
Journal of Dental School,
Vol. 42 No. 3 (2024),
27 July 2024
,
Page 120-124
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v42i3.45311
Abstract
Objectives Restoration of primary teeth have become more critical than extracting them. Composite resin materials are considered suitable materials for primary teeth restoration due to their aesthetic and acceptable performance. However, they have limitations such as polymerization shrinkage, microleakage, post-treatment sensitivity, and reduced marginal adaptation. This study evaluated the microleakage of Tokuyama Bulk flow composite and Grandiflow composite resin materials in restored primary teeth.
Methods In this in vitro study, 54 primary teeth were randomly divided into two groups. After preparing the Class II cavity in the samples and applying acid etch and bonding material, one group was allocated to the Tokuyama Bulk flow composite, and the other group was allocated to the Grandiflow composite. The amount of microleakage was determined by immersion of samples in 1% methylene blue dye and evaluation under stereomicroscope. Scores from 0 to 3 were assigned depending on the degree of dye penetration. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the scores in two groups at a significance level of 0.05.
Results The amount of microleakage in the Grandiflow group was significantly higher than the Tokuyama Bulk flow group (p=0.019). In the Grandiflow group, the highest microleakage score was 3 (63.0%), 2 (29.6%), and 1 (7.4%), respectively. In the Tokuyama Bulk flow group, the highest microleakage scores were 2 (55.6%), 3 (29.6%), 1 (11.1%), and 0 (3.7%), respectively.
Conclusion It can be concluded that Tokuyama Bulk flow composites have lower microleakage than the Grandiflow composite, potentially affecting the microleakage and subsequent failure of the restoration in a positive way.
- Deciduous tooth
- Composite resins
How to Cite
References
Mosharrafian S, Shafizadeh M, Sharifi Z. Fracture Resistance of a Bulk-Fill and a Conventional Composite and the Combination of Both for Coronal Restoration of Severely Damaged Primary Anterior Teeth. Front Dent. 2019;16(1):69-77.
Machiulskiene V, Campus G, Carvalho JC, Dige I, Ekstrand KR, Jablonski-Momeni A, et al. Terminology of Dental Caries and Dental Caries Management: Consensus Report of a Workshop Organized by ORCA and Cariology Research Group of IADR. Caries Res. 2020;54(1):7-14.
Schmoeckel J, Gorseta K, Splieth CH, Juric H. How to Intervene in the Caries Process: Early Childhood Caries - A Systematic Review. Caries Res. 2020;54(2):102-12.
Duggal M, Gizani S, Albadri S, Krämer N, Stratigaki E, Tong HJ, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for treating deep carious lesions in primary teeth: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022;23(5):659-66.
BaniHani A, Santamaría RM, Hu S, Maden M, Albadri S. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing carious lesions into dentine in primary teeth: an umbrella review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022;23(5):667-93.
Tavangar M, Tayefeh Davalloo R, Darabi F, Karambin M, Kazemi R. A Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Two Low-Shrinkage Composites with a Conventional Resin Composite: an In Vitro Assessment. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016;17(1):55-61.
Yeolekar TS, Chowdhary NR, Mukunda KS, Kiran NK. Evaluation of Microleakage and Marginal Ridge Fracture Resistance of Primary Molars Restored with Three Restorative Materials: A Comparative in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8(2):108-13.
Mazumdar P, Das A, Das UK. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement, cention N), in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(2):277-81.
Moradian H, Jafarian S. Comparison of the Microleakage of Encapsulated and Hand-Mixed Glass Ionomer in Class V Restorations in Deciduous Teeth. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2014;6(2):64-7.
Bakhsh TA, Khan SJ, Gharamah HA, Alshoaibi E, Turkistani A. Nondestructive evaluation of microleakage in restored primary teeth using CP-OCT. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021;24(6):919-24.
Pham KV, Huynh TTT. Bond Strength and Fracture Resistance of Flowable Bulk Fill Composite Posts and Cores in Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019;9(5):522-6.
Reis AF, Vestphal M, Amaral RCD, Rodrigues JA, Roulet JF, Roscoe MG. Efficiency of polymerization of bulk-fill composite resins: a systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31(suppl 1):e59.
Unnikrishnan S, Krishnamurthy NH, Nagarathna C. Marginal microleakage of glass ionomer cement with two different cavity conditioners on primary anterior teeth - An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(2):267-72.
Subramaniam P, Pandey A. Assessment of Microleakage of a Composite Resin Restoration in Primary Teeth Following Class III Cavity Preparation Using Er, Cr: YSGG laser: An In Vitro Study. J Lasers Med Sci. 2016;7(3):172-6.
Ramires-Romito AC, Wanderley MT, Oliveira MD, Imparato JC, Corrêa MS. Biologic restoration of primary anterior teeth. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(6):405-11.
Mendes FM, De Benedetto MS, del Conte Zardetto CG, Wanderley MT, Correa MS. Resin composite restoration in primary anterior teeth using short-post technique and strip crowns: a case report. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(9):689-92.
Gopinath VK. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35(3):238-43.
Olegário IC, Hesse D, Bönecker M, Imparato JC, Braga MM, Mendes FM, et al. Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2016;17(1):34.
Ibrahim MS, AlKhalefah AS, Alsaghirat AA, Alburayh RA, Alabdullah NA. Comparison between Different Bulk-Fill and Incremental Composite Materials Used for Class II Restorations in Primary and Permanent Teeth: In Vitro Assessments. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(20).
Mosharrafian S, Heidari A, Rahbar P. Microleakage of Two Bulk Fill and One Conventional Composite in Class II Restorations of Primary Posterior Teeth. J Dent (Tehran). 2017;14(3):123-31.
Güngör HC, Canoğlu E, Cehreli ZC. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;38(3):223-8.
De Menezes Oliveira MA, Torres CP, Gomes-Silva JM, Chinelatti MA, De Menezes FC, Palma-Dibb RG, et al. Microstructure and mineral composition of dental enamel of permanent and deciduous teeth. Microsc Res Tech. 2010;73(5):572-7.
Cayo-Rojas CF, Hernández-Caba KK, Aliaga-Mariñas AS, Ladera-Castañeda MI, Cervantes-Ganoza LA. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):619.
Mosharrafian S, Farahmand N, Poorzandpoush K, Hosseinipour ZS, Kahforushan M. In vitro microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins of class II cavities of primary molars restored with a bulk-fill and a conventional composite. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023;9(3):512-7.
AlSagob EI, Bardwell DN, Ali AO, Khayat SG, Stark PC. Comparison of microleakage between bulk-fill flowable and nanofilled resin-based composites. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2018;10(2):102-9.
Malekafzali B, Asnaashari M, Javadi F. Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary canine teeth prepared with high-speed diamond bur, Er:YAG laser and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Laser Ther. 2017;26(3):195-202.
Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, et al. Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(1):1-8.
Behery H, El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Nabih S, Saleh B. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations. Dent Med Probl. 2018;55(4):383-8.
García Marí L, Climent Gil A, C LLP. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(5):721-7.
Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB. How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater. 2008;24(11):1501-5.
Ikeda I, Otsuki M, Sadr A, Nomura T, Kishikawa R, Tagami J. Effect of filler content of flowable composites on resin-cavity interface. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(6):679-85.
- Abstract Viewed: 229 times
- PDF Downloaded: 124 times