Comparison of Apical debris Extrusion of ProTaper Universal rotary and SafeSiders reciprocal Systems debris Extrusion of ProTaper Universal and SafeSiders
Journal of Dental School,
Vol. 41 No. 4 (2023),
7 May 2024
,
Page 128-132
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v41i4.43814
Abstract
Objectives During root canal preparation, dentinal chips, irrigants, and pulp remnants are extruded into the pre-radicular space. This phenomenon may lead to post-endodontic flare-ups. Furthermore, different preparation systems may be associated with varying amounts of apically extruded debris. This study aimed to compare the amount of debris extrusion using two endodontic preparation systems: ProTaper Universal and SafeSiders.
Methods In this in vitro study, 30 single-rooted human mandibular premolars with fully developed apices and curvatures of 0-10 degrees were randomly assigned to two groups (N=15). The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Universal and the SafeSiders system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extruded debris was collected into pre-weighed tubes by washing the apical foramen area with 1cc of distilled water. After incubating tubes for ten days to evaporate the remaining irrigants, the amount of apically extruded debris was calculated by subtracting each tube's initial and final weight. Data were analyzed by Student t-test at P<0.05.
Results The mean values for the amount of apically extruded debris using ProTaper Universal and SafeSiders system were 0.0018±0.0004 g and 0.0023±0.0006 g, respectively. The two groups had a statistically significant difference regarding the amount of the apically extruded debris. The SafeSiders system caused significantly more debris extrusion than the ProTaper Universal system (p<0.01).
Conclusion Both the ProTaper Universal rotary system and the SafeSiders reciprocating system caused apical debris extrusion; However, ProTaper Universal was associated with less debris extrusion.
- Apically Extruded Debris;
- SafeSiders;
- ProTaper Universal
How to Cite
References
Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the pulp. St Louis. Mosby, Inc; 2002.
Mehdi JA, Al-Zaka IM, Al-Obiedy AA-O. Evaluation of apically extruded debris by using hand and rotary Nickel-Titanium instruments. Mustansiria Dent J. 2009;6(4):292-8.
McKendry DJ. Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: quantification of extruded apical debris. J Endod. 1990;16(1):24-7.
Sen OG, Bilgin B, Koçak S, Sağlam BC, Koçak MM. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris Using Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, or Adaptive Motion. Braz Dent J
. 2018;29(3):245-8.
Shahraki Ebrahimi HA, Maserat V, Aghaei Soltani F, Kazemi R, Saeedi Robat M, Labafchi A. Comparison of Three Rotary File Systems of Superfile Denco, Sp1 Gold, and ProTaper Universal in terms of Debris Extrusion. J. Dent Mater Tech. 2022;11(1):62-7.
Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2016;49(3):255-70.
Bürklein S, Benten S, Schäfer E. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo. Int Endod J. 2014;47(5):405-9.
Kaushal D, Reddy SG, Biswas KP, Dixit A, Chowdhry R, Chug A. Apical extrusion of debris with root canal instrumentation in primary teeth: A systematic review. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev. 2022;40(1):9-18.
Eshagh Saberi A, Ebrahimipour S, Saberi M. Apical Debris Extrusion with Conventional Rotary and Reciprocating Instruments. Iran Endod J. 2020;15(1):38-43.
Alnassar I, Alsafadi AS, Kouchaji CJD, Problems M. Assessment of the apically extruded debris between a rotary system, a reciprocating system and hand files during the root canal instrumentation of the deciduous molars. Dent Med Probl. 2019;56(1):53-7.
Nabavizadeh M, Shokouhi MM, Kheirandish M, Sahebi S, Sadatshojaee N, Abbaszadegan AJJoD. A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems. J Dent (Shiraz). 2021;22(3):193.
Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
. 1971;32(2):271-5.
Martin H, Cunningham WT. The effect of endosonic and hand manipulation on the amount of root canal material extruded. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;53(6):611-3.
Mollashahi NF, Saberi EA, Havaei SR, Sabeti M. Comparison of Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Preparation with Two Reciprocating and Rotary Single-File Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(1):15-9.
Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985;11(11):472-8.
De-Deus G, Brandão MC, Barino B, Di Giorgi K, Fidel RA, Luna AS. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the single-file ProTaper F2 technique under reciprocating movement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;110(3):390-4.
Vivekanandhan P, Subbiya A, Mitthra S, Karthick A. Comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(3):245-9.
Surakanti JR, Venkata RC, Vemisetty HK, Dandolu RK, Jaya NK, Thota S. Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper™, Hyflex™ and Waveone™ rotary systems. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(2):129-32.
Verma M, Meena N, Kumari RA, Mallandur S, Vikram R, Gowda V. Comparison of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using instrumentation techniques with two operating principles: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(2):96-9.
Gkampesi S, Mylona Z, Zarra T, Lambrianidis T. Assessment of apical extrusion of debris during endodontic retreatment with 3 rotary nickel-titanium retreatment systems and hand files. Balk. J. Dent. Med. 2016;20(1):22-8.
Hilaly Eid GE, Wanees Amin SA. Changes in diameter, cross-sectional area, and extent of canal-wall touching on using 3 instrumentation techniques in long-oval canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(5):688-95.
Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):449-61.
Uzun I, Güler B, Özyürek T, Tunc T. Apical extrusion of debris using reciprocating files and rotary instrumentation systems. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19(1):71-5.
Koçak S, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC, Türker SA, Sağsen B, Er Ö. Apical extrusion of debris using self-adjusting file, reciprocating single-file, and 2 rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod. 2013;39(10):1278-80.
Siqueira JF, Jr. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J. 2003;36(7):453-63.
Jaggi P, Mulay S, Tandale A, Jadhao R, Joshi P, Aras S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Debris Extrusion, Remaining Dentin Thickness and Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Rotary and Reciprocating Endodontic File Systems: An In Vitro Study. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42290.
Toyoğlu M, Altunbaş D. Influence of Different Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Irrigant and Debris during Canal Preparation Using K3XF Instruments. J Endod. 2017;43(9):1565-8.
Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M, Plotino G. Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumentation with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Shaper Nickel-titanium Files. J Endod. 2018;44(5):856-9.
- Abstract Viewed: 148 times
- PDF Downloaded: 98 times