Publisher: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Dental School

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Journal Metrics
    • Editorial Team
    • Aims & Scope
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Open Access
    • Publication Fees
    • Privacy Statement
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Policies & Process
    • Peer Review Process
    • Complaints And Appeals
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • Data and Reproducibility
    • Plagiarism
    • Post Publication
    • Misconducts
    • Preprint
    • Archiving
    • Editorial Independence
    • Copyright
  • For Authors
    • Authorship
    • Forms
    • Ethical Guidelines and Considerations
    • Reporting Guidelines
  • Submission
    • Submit a New Manuscript
    • Track Your Submission
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Download Original Article Template
    • Download Title Page Form
    • Download Publishing Agreement Form
  • Register
  • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 39 No. 2 (2021): Spring
  4. Case Report

Vol. 39 No. 2 (2021)

April 2022

Contributing Factors to Bone Graft Loss in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Case Report

  • Mehdi Ekhlasmand Kermani
  • Ardeshir Lafzi
  • Mina Lesani
  • Nastaran Fahiminejad
  • Negar Daneshvar

Journal of Dental School, Vol. 39 No. 2 (2021), 13 April 2022 , Page 67-72
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v39i2.36693 Published: 2022-03-12

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Objectives Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is one of the most commonly used techniques for alveolar ridge augmentation. With the increasing demand for implant treatments and ridge augmentation, the prevalence of GBR complications has also increased. Herein, we discuss the factors affecting particulate graft integration in the GBR technique, and describe re-treatment of a failed site.

Case GBR with particulate xenograft bone material was performed in a systemically healthy young female. After 6 months, the re-entry surgery revealed failed graft integration despite the clinically normal appearance of the site, and uneventful healing period. The failed site was re-treated successfully with cortical tenting technique, and re-entry revealed integrated graft after 5 months from the second surgery.

Conclusion In addition to the PASS principle to achieve successful results in GBR, the graft particle properties, compaction force of the graft particles, defect characteristics, and waiting time for graft maturation are some of the factors that may affect the results of GBR. Cortical tenting could be a predictable technique for subsequent grafting in failed GBR sites.

Keywords:
  • Bone Regeneration
  • Graft Survival
  • PDF

How to Cite

Ekhlasmand Kermani, M. ., Lafzi, A. ., Lesani, M. ., Fahiminejad, N. ., & Daneshvar, N. (2022). Contributing Factors to Bone Graft Loss in Guided Bone Regeneration: A Case Report . Journal of Dental School, 39(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v39i2.36693
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Tay JRH, Lu XJ, Lai WMC, Fu JH. Clinical and histological sequelae of surgical complications in horizontal guided bone regeneration: a systematic review and proposal for management.Int J Implant Dent . 2020 Nov 26;6(1):76.

Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(9):809-18.

Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212-8.

Dahlin C, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Linde A, Nyman S. Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: an experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4(1):19-25.

Wang HL, Boyapati L. "PASS" principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006;15(1):8-17.

Schmid J, Wallkamm B, Hämmerle CH, Gogolewski S, Lang NP. The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(3):244-8.

Hämmerle CH, Schmid J, Olah AJ, Lang NP. Osseous healing of experimentally created defects in the calvaria of rabbits using guided bone regeneration. A pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3(3):144-7.

Thoma DS, Bienz SP, Figuero E, Jung RE, Sanz-Martín I. Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation performed simultaneously with dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46 Suppl 21:257-76.

Lim G, Lin GH, Monje A, Chan HL, Wang HL. Wound Healing Complications Following Guided Bone Regeneration for Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):41–50.

Cypher TJ, Grossman JP. Biological principles of bone graft healing. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35(5):413-7.

Tv N, Bansal S, Bansal P, Narayan S. Dynamics of bone graft healing around implants. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ. 2015;7;S1:40-7..

Liu J, Kerns DG. Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: a review. Open Dent J. 2014;8:56-65.

Fugazzotto PA. GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 1: histologic results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23(4):361-9.

Klinge B, Nilvéus R, Egelberg J. Effect of crown-attached sutures on healing of experimental furcation defects in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1985;12(5):369-73.

Murphy KG. Postoperative healing complications associated with Gore-Tex Periodontal Material. Part II. Effect of complications on regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1995;15(6):548-61.

Tonetti MS, Pini-Prato G, Cortellini P. Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defects. IV. Determinants of healing response. J Periodontol. 1993;64(10):934-40.

Aghaloo T, Pi-Anfruns J, Moshaverinia A, Sim D, Grogan T, Hadaya D. The Effects of Systemic Diseases and Medications on Implant Osseointegration: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:S35-49.

Amid R, Kheiri A. Structural and chemical features of xenograft bone substitutes: A systematic review of in vitro studies.Biotechnol Appl Biochem . 2021;68(6):1432-52.

Viteri-Agustín I, Brizuela-Velasco A, Lou-Bonafonte JM, Jiménez-Garrudo A, Chávarri-Prado D, Pérez-Pevida E, et al. The Impact of Compaction Force on Graft Consolidation in a Guided Bone Regeneration Model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(5):917-23.

Isaksson S, Alberius P, Klinge B. Influence of three alloplastic materials on calvarial bone healing. An experimental evaluation of HTR-polymer, lactomer beads, and a carrier gel. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;22(6):375-81.

Brugnami F, Mellonig JT. Treatment of a large periapical lesion with loss of labial cortical plate using GTR: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999;19(3):243-9.

Doi K, Kubo T, Makihara Y, Oue H, Morita K, Oki Y, et al. Osseointegration aspects of placed implant in bone reconstruction with newly developed block-type interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(4):325-31.

Krauser J, Schetritt A. Implant Site Development: Socket Preservation. 2015. p: 121-35.

Cho IW, Park JC. A comparison of different compressive forces on graft materials during alveolar ridge preservation. 2017;47(1):51-63.

Goodman SB. The effects of micromotion and particulate materials on tissue differentiation. Bone chamber studies in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1994;258:1-43.

Betts DC, Müller R. Mechanical regulation of bone regeneration: theories, models, and experiments. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5:211.

Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:218-36.

Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:237-59.

Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17 Suppl 2:136-59.

Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Coletti FL, Faeda RS, Pereira LA, Marcantonio E, Jr. Graft incorporation and implant osseointegration following the use of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts for lateral ridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(2):226-33.

Pistilli R, Felice P, Piatelli M, Nisii A, Barausse C, Esposito M. Blocks of autogenous bone versus xenografts for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants: preliminary data from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(2):153-71.

Checchi V, Gasparro R, Pistilli R, Canullo L, Felice P.. Clinical Classification of Bone Augmentation Procedure Failures in the Atrophic Anterior Maxillae: Esthetic Consequences and Treatment Options. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:4386709.

Hjørting-Hansen E. Bone grafting to the jaws with special reference to reconstructive preprosthetic surgery. A historical review. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2002;6(1):6-14.

Buser D, Dula K, Hirt HP, Schenk RK. Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes: a clinical study with 40 partially edentulous patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54(4):420-32.

Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L. Symphysis revisited: clinical and histologic evaluation of newly formed bone and reharvesting potential of previously used symphysial donor sites for onlay bone grafting. J Periodontol. 2009;80(5):865-9.

Levin L, Nitzan D, Schwartz-Arad D. Success of dental implants placed in intraoral block bone grafts. J Periodontol. 2007;78(1):18-21.

Le B, Burstein J, Sedghizadeh PP. Cortical tenting grafting technique in the severely atrophic alveolar ridge for implant site preparation. Implant Dent. 2008;17(1):40-50.

Barboza E, Caúla A, Machado F. Potential of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 1999;8(4):360-7.

Morad G, Khojasteh A. Cortical tenting technique versus onlay layered technique for vertical augmentation of atrophic posterior mandibles: a split-mouth pilot study. Implant Dent. 2013;22(6):566-71.

  • Abstract Viewed: 231 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 185 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Make a Submission

Make a Submission
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

e-ISSN: 2645-4351

Creative Commons License

This journal is open access and available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 
Powered by OJSPlus