Effect of Maxillary Central Incisor Inclination on Palatal Bone Width Max. Incisors Inclination Vs Palatal Bone Breadth
Journal of Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,
Vol. 39 No. 2 (2021),
13 Farvardin 2022
,
Page 48-53
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v39i2.36426
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the effect of labiopalatal inclination of maxillary right central incisor on palatal bone width using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Methods The angle formed between the longitudinal axis of the right central incisor and the palatal plane was measured on 75 CBCT images, and classified into three groups of labially-inclined, lingually-inclined, and normal groups. The total palatal bone thickness in the apical region of the upper right central incisor was linearly measured perpendicular to the tooth axis on sagittal slices. The intraclass correlation coefficient, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients were used for data analysis (alpha=0.05).
Results A significant difference was noted among the groups in the total apical palatal bone thickness (P<0.05). The labially-inclined group had significantly lower bone thickness than the other two groups (P=0.002, 95% CI: 5.5-7.38); however, this correlation was inverse (Pearson’s R=-0.58), which means that as the angle between the upper central incisor axis and the palatal plane increased, the bone thickness significantly decreased. No correlation was found between the palatal bone thickness (cancellous or cortical) and tooth inclination (P>0.05). Arch length was not correlated with any group either (P>0.05).
Conclusion Labial inclination of upper central incisor causes the root apex to be closer to the palatal alveolar bone, resulting in less apical bone support in the palatal area.
- Incisor
- Palate
- Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
How to Cite
References
Sendyk M, de Paiva JB, Abrao J, Rino Neto J. Correlation between buccolingual tooth inclination and alveolar bone thickness in subjects with Class III dentofacial deformities. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;152(1):66-79.
Lupi JE, Handelman CS, Sadowsky C. Prevalence and severity of apical root resorption and alveolar bone loss in orthodontically treated adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109(1):28-37.
Fuhrmann RA. Three-dimensional evaluation of periodontalremodeling during orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod. 2002;8(1):23-8.
Chaurasia A, Katheriya G, Patil R. The relationship between maxillary and mandibular central incisor inclination and assessment of supporting bone thickness-A cross sectional cone beam computed tomography study. J Oral Med Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017;3(1):23-34.
Tian YL, Liu F, Sun HJ, Lv P, Cao YM, Yu M, et al. Alveolar bone thickness around maxillary central incisors of different inclination assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2015;45(5):245-52.
Linjawi A. Predictive Factors Affecting the Maxillary Alveolar Bone Thickness: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:359-65.
Wei D, Zhang L, Li W, Jia Y. Quantitative Comparison of Cephalogram and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Thickness of Maxillary Incisors. Turk J Orthod. 2020;33(2):85-91.
Porto OCL, Silva BSF, Silva JA, Estrela CRA, Alencar AHG, Bueno MDR, et al. CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28:e20190148.
Ganguly R, Ruprecht A, Vincent S, Hellstein J, Timmons S, Qian F. Accuracy of linear measurement in the Galileos cone beam computed tomography under simulated clinical conditions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(5):299-305.
Raber A, Kula K, Ghoneima A. Three-dimensional evaluation of labial alveolar bone overlying the maxillary and mandibular incisors in different skeletal classifications of malocclusion. Int Orthod. 2019;17(2):287-95.
Tong H, Enciso R, Van Elslande D, Major PW, Sameshima GT. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142(1):133-43.
Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(1):19-25.
Lee KJ, Joo E, Kim KD, Lee JS, Park YC, Yu HS. Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(4):486-94.
Nahas-Scocate AC, de Siqueira Brandao A, Patel MP, Lipiec-Ximenez ME, Chilvarquer I, do Valle-Corotti KM. Bone tissue amount related to upper incisors inclination. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(2):279-85.
Chan E, Dalci O, Petocz P, Papadopoulou AK, Darendeliler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: Part 26. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic root resorption: A microcomputed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(2):204-13.
Do TA, Shen YW, Fuh LJ, Huang HL. Clinical assessment of the palatal alveolar bone thickness and its correlation with the buccolingual angulation of maxillary incisors for immediate implant placement. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(5):1080-6.
Uner DD, Izol BS, Gorus Z. Correlation between buccal and alveolar bone widths at the central incisors according to cone-beam-computed tomography. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(1):79-84.
Eksriwong T, Thongudomporn U. Alveolar bone response to maxillary incisor retraction using stable skeletal structures as a reference. Angle Orthod. 2021;91(1):30-5.
Ten Hoeve A, Mulie RM. The effect of antero-postero incisor repositioning on the palatal cortex as studied with laminagraphy. JCO. 1976;10(11):804-22.
Matsumoto K, Sherrill-Mix S, Boucher N, Tanna N. A cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of alveolar bone dimensional changes and the periodontal limits of mandibular incisor advancement in skeletal Class II patients. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(3):330-8.
Gul Amuk N, Kurt G, Karsli E, Ozcan S, Acar MB, Amuk M, et al. Effects of mesenchymal stem cell transfer on orthodontically induced root resorption and orthodontic tooth movement during orthodontic arch expansion protocols: an experimental study in rats. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(3):305-16.
Laursen MG, Rylev M, Melsen B. The role of orthodontics in the repair of gingival recessions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(1):29-34.
Kajan ZD, Seyed Monir SE, Khosravifard N, Jahri D. Fenestration and dehiscence in the alveolar bone of anterior maxillary and mandibular teeth in cone-beam computed tomography of an Iranian population. Dent Res J 2020;17(5):380-7.
Christoph KM, Campbell PM, Feng JQ, Taylor RW, Jacob HB, Buschang PH. Effects of transverse bodily movements of maxillary premolars on the surrounding hard tissue. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(4):490-502.
Sadek MM, Sabet NE, Hassan IT. Three-dimensional mapping of cortical bone thickness in subjects with different vertical facial dimensions. Prog Orthod. 2016;17(1):32.
Vidalón JA, Liñan C, Tay LY, Meneses A, Lagravère M. Evaluation of the palatal bone in different facial patterns for orthodontic mini-implants insertion: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2021;26.
Icen M, Orhan K, Seker C, Geduk G, Cakmak Ozlu F, Cengiz MI. Comparison of CBCT with different voxel sizes and intraoral scanner for detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020;49(5):20190197.
Fuhrmann R. Three-dimensional interpretation of labiolingual bone width of the lower incisors. Part II. J Orofac Orthop. 1996;57(3):168-85
- Abstract Viewed: 123 times
- PDF Downloaded: 94 times