In Vitro Microleakage of Bulk Fill and Conventional Composites and a Hybrid Glass Ion-omer in Primary Molars
Journal of Dental School,
Vol. 37 No. 4 (2019),
10 October 2020
,
Page 137-142
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v37i4.30524
Abstract
Objectives The main disadvantage of composite resins is their polymerization shrinkage, which can lead to microleakage. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage of bulk fill and conventional composites and a new hybrid glass ionomer (GI) in class II restorations of primary molar teeth.
Methods In this in vitro study, 51 primary molar teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Standard class II cavities were then prepared. In group 1 the cavities were restored with Filtek bulk fill composite; in group 2, the cavities were incrementally filled with Z250 conventional composite and in group 3, EQUIA Forte hybrid GI resin was used to fill the cavities. The teeth were subjected to thermal and then mechanical thermocycling. Afterwards, the teeth were immersed in 1% methylene blue solution. The teeth were then mesiodistally sectioned, and microleakage was evaluated at the occlusal and gingival margins under a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The Shapiro-Wilk and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to statistically analyze the data.
Results There was no statistically significant difference in the mean microleakage of bulk fill and conventional composites and hybrid GI in the occlusal (P=0.495) or gingival (P=0.293) margins. The gingival microleakage was significantly higher than occlusal microleakage in all three groups (P<0.05).
Conclusion Based on the results of the present study, microleakage of Filtek bulk fill composite is the same as that of Z250 conventional composite and EQUIA Forte hybrid GI.
- Dental leakage
- Composite resins
- Tooth
- Deciduous
- Molar
How to Cite
References
Oliveira MT, Constantino HV, Molina GO, Milioli E, Ghizoni JS, Pereira JR. Evaluation of mercury contamination in patients and water during amalgam removal. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2014 Mar; 15(2):[165-8 pp.].
Rasines Alcaraz MG, Veitz-Keenan A, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Davis D, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2014 Mar; 2014(3):Cd005620.
Ilie N, Hickel R. Macro-, micro- and nano-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites. Dent Mater J. 2009 Jun;25(6):810-9.
Bausch JR, de Lange K, Davidson CL, Peters A, de Gee AJ. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1982 Jul;48(1):59-67.
Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc. 1972 Jun;84(6):1349-57.
Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater J. 2001 May;17(3):253-9.
Bowen RL, Nemoto K, Rapson JE. Adhesive Bonding of Various Materials to Hard Tooth Tissues: Forces Developing in Composite Materials during Hardening. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983 Apr;106(4):475-7.
Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984 Dec;63(12):1396-9.
Agrawal VS, Parekh VV, Shah NC. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of silorane-based composite and nanohybrid composite with or without polyethylene fiber inserts in class II restorations: an in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):E1-7.
Idriss S, Abduljabbar T, Habib C, Omar R. Factors associated with microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):60-6.
Moazzami SM, Sarabi N, Hajizadeh H, Majidinia S, Li Y, Meharry MR, et al. Efficacy of four lining materials in sandwich technique to reduce microleakage in class II composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2014 May-Jan;39(3):256-63.
Vicente A, Ortiz AJ, Bravo LA. Microleakage beneath brackets bonded with flowable materials: effect of thermocycling. Eur J Orthod. 2009 Aug;31(4):390-6.
Gogna R, Jagadis S, Shashikal K. A comparative in vitro study of microleakage by a radioactive isotope and compressive strength of three nanofilled composite resin restorations. J Conserv Dent. 2011 Apr;14(2):128-31.
Radhika M, Sajjan GS, Kumaraswamy B, Mittal N. Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Apr;13(1):9-15.
Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014 Apr;42(4):439-49.
Carrilho MR, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM. Mechanical stability of resin-dentin bond components. Dent Mater J. 2005 Mar;21(3):232-41.
Aguiar FHB, Ajudarte KF, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing modes and filling techniques on microleakage of posterior resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2002 Dec;27(6):557-62.
Sadeghi M, Lynch C. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction. Oper Dent. 2009 May;34(3):306-11.
Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater J. 2005 Jan;21(1):68-74.
Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater J. 2005 Jan;21(1):9-20.
Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent. 2013 N0v-Dec;38(6):618-25.
Bucuta S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin. 2014 Nov;18(8):1991-2000.
El-Damanhoury H, Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;39(4):374-82.
Moorthy A, Hogg C, Dowling A, Grufferty B, Benetti AR, Fleming G. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):500-5.
Van Ende A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Bulk-filling of high C-factor posterior cavities: effect on adhesion to cavity-bottom dentin. Dent Mater J. 2013 Mar;29(3):269-77.
Ilie N, Schöner C, Bücher K, Hickel R. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):850-5.
Van Ende A, De Munck J, Lise DP, Van Meerbeek BJJAD. Bulk-fill composites: a review of the current literature. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(2):95-109.
Gopinath VK. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars. Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2017 Jul-Sep;35(3):238-43.
Mosharrafian S, Heidari A, Rahbar P. Microleakage of Two Bulk Fill and One Conventional Composite in Class II Restorations of Primary Posterior Teeth. J Dent (Tehran). 2017 May;14(3):123.
Eltoum N, Bakry N, Talaat D, Elshabrawy S. Microleakage evaluation of bulk-fill composite in class ii restorations of primary molars. Alexandria Dent J. 2019 Spring;44(1):111-6.
Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014 Aug;42(8):993-1000.
Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. J Dent. 2007 Feb;35(2):124-9.
Lassila LV, Nagas E, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S. Translucency of flowable bulk-filling composites of various thicknesses. Chin J Dent Res. 2012;15(1):31-5.
Garcia Mari L, Climent Gil A, C LLP. In vitro evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: High-viscosity bulk-fill vs conventional composites. Dent Mater J. 2019 Oct ;38(5):721-7.
Chowdhary N, Subba Reddy VV. Dentin comparison in primary and permanent molars under transmitted and polarised light microscopy: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2010 Jul-Sep;28(3):167-72.
Khoroushi M, Karvandi TM, Kamali B, Mazaheri H. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: Effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Indian J Dent Sci. 2012;23(3):378-83.
- Abstract Viewed: 282 times
- pdf Downloaded: 76 times