Publisher: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Dental School

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Journal Metrics
    • Editorial Team
    • Aims & Scope
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Open Access
    • Publication Fees
    • Privacy Statement
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Policies & Process
    • Peer Review Process
    • Complaints And Appeals
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • Data and Reproducibility
    • Plagiarism
    • Post Publication
    • Misconducts
    • Preprint
    • Archiving
    • Editorial Independence
    • Copyright
  • For Authors
    • Authorship
    • Forms
    • Ethical Guidelines and Considerations
    • Reporting Guidelines
  • Submission
    • Submit a New Manuscript
    • Track Your Submission
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Download Original Article Template
    • Download Title Page Form
    • Download Publishing Agreement Form
  • Register
  • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 37 No. 4 (2019): Autumn
  4. Original Article

Vol. 37 No. 4 (2019)

October 2020

Effect of Various Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Composites

  • farnaz farahat
  • abdolrahim davari
  • Alireza Hakimzade ardakani
  • marzie moslehi

Journal of Dental School, Vol. 37 No. 4 (2019), 10 October 2020 , Page 118-122
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v37i4.28592 Published: 2020-11-23

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Objectives Finishing and polishing systems may affect the surface properties of composite resins. In this in vitro study, we evaluated the surface roughness of two composite resins after polishing with three different polishing systems.

Methods Thirty-six specimens (8 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness) were fabricated from Kalore nanohybrid and Gradia Direct microhybrid composite in a Teflon mold and divided into four groups according to the polishing protocol (n=9): control group, Sof-Lex, Super Snap, and Jiffy. The mean surface roughness (Ra) values were determined using a profilometer and the surface of two samples in each group was observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way ANOVA. The significance level was set at 5%.

Results Profilometric evaluation showed that in both composite resins, the smoothest surfaces were obtained with Mylar strip; also Jiffy showed significantly higher Ra values than other polishing systems. Type of composite and polishing technique had significant effects on surface roughness (P=0.0001). SEM observations also showed that surface roughness of Jiffy was more than that of three other groups.

Conclusion After the use of finishing and polishing systems, the surface roughness of Gradia was higher than Kalore in all polishing systems. Sof-Lex and Super Snap were effective on Gradia, and jiffy created the roughest surface.

Keywords:
  • Composite Resin;
  • Dental Polishing;
  • surface properties;
  • pdf

How to Cite

farahat, farnaz, davari, abdolrahim, Hakimzade ardakani, A., & moslehi, marzie. (2020). Effect of Various Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Composites. Journal of Dental School, 37(4), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v37i4.28592
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Yap AUJ, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: Effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004 May;29(3):275-9.

Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dentistry 2006 Jan;31(1):11-7.

Roeder LB, Powers JM. Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds. Am J Dent 2004 Apr;17(2):109-12.

Morgan M. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004 Apr;16(3): 211-34.

Yap AUJ, Ng JJ, Yap SH, Teo CK. Surface finish of resin-modified and highly viscous glass ionomer cements produced by new one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004 Jan;29(1):87-91.

Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar NU, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper Dent 2008 Jan;33(1):44-50.

Yap AU, Mok BY. Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material. Oper Dent 2002 Mar-Apr; 27(2):161-6.

Yap AU, Tan S, The TY. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: Part 1. Conventional and resin‐modified glass–ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 2000 Feb;27(2):117-23.

Schmidlin PR, Göhring TN. Finishing tooth-colored restorations in vitro: An index of surface alteration and finish-line destruction. Oper Dent 2004 Jan-Feb;29(1):80-6.

Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Lovadino DJR, dos Santos Dias CT. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2002 Jun;15(3):193-7.

Özgünaltay G, Yazici AR, Görücü J, Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth‐coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2003 Jan;30(2):218-24.

Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1998 Oct; 42(4):613-27.

Rigo LC, Bordin D, Fardin VP, Coelho PG, Bromage TG, Reis A, et al. Influence of Polishing System on the Surface Roughness of Flowable and Regular-Viscosity Bulk Fill Composites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018 Jul-Aug;38(4);79-86.

Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007 Jan;32(2):185-92.

Güler AU, Duran I, Yȕcel AC, Özkan P. Effects of air polishing powders on the surface roughness of composite resins. J Dent Sci 2010 Sep;5(3):136-43.

Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchison D. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent 2002 May;27(3):243-47.

Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2004 May;135(5):587-94.

Bouvier D, Duprez JP, Lissac M. Comparative evaluation of polishing systems on the surface of three aesthetic materials. J Oral Rehabil 1997 Jun;24(12):888-94.

Lainović T, Vilotić M, Blažić L, Kakaš D, Marković D, Ivanišević A. Determination of surface roughness and topography of dental resin-based nanocomposites using AFM analysis. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2013 Feb;13(1):34-43.

Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozsoy A, Topcu FT. Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials. J Dent Sci 2013 Jun;8(2):160-9.

Giacomelli L, Derchi G, Frustaci A, Orlando B, Covani U, Barone A, et al. Surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: an analysis with atomic force microscopy. Open Dent J 2010 Sep;4:191-4.

St-Pierre L, Martel C, Crépeau H, Vargas MA. Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resins: polishability of composite resins. Oper Dent 2019 May-Jun;44(3):E122-32.

Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Broome JC, editors. Summitt's fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. 4th Ed. Quintessence Publishing Co. 2013; Chap11: 284-6

Rodrigues-Junior SA, Chemin P, Piaia PP, Ferracane JL. Surface roughness and gloss of actual composites as polished with different polishing systems. Oper Dent 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):418-29.

Dutta S, Maria R. “The Effect Of Various Polishing Systems On Surface Roughness Of Nano and Microhybrid Composite Restoratives: An In Vitro Surface Profilometric Study. Indian J Basic Applied Med Res 2012 Jun;1:214-26.

Nair VS, Sainudeen S, Padmanabhan P, Vijayashankar LV, Sujathan U, Pillai R. Three-dimensional evaluation of surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing. J Conserv Dent 2016 Jan-Feb;19(1):91-5.

Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 2004 Jan;196(1):42-5.

Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997 Jul;13(4):258-69.

Setcos JC, Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composites by new polishing systems. Quintessence Int 1999 Mar;30(3):169-73.

Madhyastha PS, Nayak D, Srikant N, Kotian R, Bhat KM. Effect of Finishing/Polishing Techniques and Time on Surface Roughness of Silorane and Methacrylate Based Restorative Materials. Oral Health Dent Management 2015 Jul;14(4):212-8.

  • Abstract Viewed: 362 times
  • pdf Downloaded: 41 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Make a Submission

Make a Submission
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

e-ISSN: 2645-4351

Creative Commons License

This journal is open access and available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 
Powered by OJSPlus