Publisher: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Dental School

  • Home
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Journal Metrics
    • Editorial Team
    • Aims & Scope
    • Indexing & Abstracting
    • Open Access
    • Publication Fees
    • Privacy Statement
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • Archive
    • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Policies & Process
    • Peer Review Process
    • Complaints And Appeals
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • Data and Reproducibility
    • Plagiarism
    • Post Publication
    • Misconducts
    • Preprint
    • Archiving
    • Editorial Independence
    • Copyright
  • For Authors
    • Authorship
    • Forms
    • Ethical Guidelines and Considerations
    • Reporting Guidelines
  • Submission
    • Submit a New Manuscript
    • Track Your Submission
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Download Original Article Template
    • Download Title Page Form
    • Download Publishing Agreement Form
  • Register
  • Contact
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 37 No. 1 (2019): Winter
  4. Original Article

Vol. 37 No. 1 (2019)

July 2019

Comparison of academic and nonacademic surgeons in treatment planning for CIII borderline case

  • Hoori Mirmohammadsadeghi
  • Amir Bayatian
  • Fatemeh Allahyari
  • Mahmood Dashti

Journal of Dental School, Vol. 37 No. 1 (2019), 2 July 2019 , Page 6-10
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v37i1.27169 Published: 2019-09-21

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Objectives In borderline class III malocclusions, the patients can be successfully treated by the orthodontic or surgical modalities, however; there is no consensus about the method with the best results regarding functional and esthetic parameters. The present study aimed to assess the treatment plans provided by academic and non-academic surgeons regarding borderline class III patients.

Methods In this cross-sectional descriptive study, diagnostic records of 20 borderline class III patients were assessed by 8 academic and 8 non-academic surgeons. The treatment plans suggested by the surgeons for patients were compared with the standard treatment plan based on case presentation. The data were analyzed by paired t-test, Wilcoxon test, Kappa coefficient, independent t-test and Chi-square test.

Results No significant differences were found between academic and non-academic orthodontists when suggesting orthodontic treatment (p=0.54), orthognathic surgery (p=0.1), single or double jaw orthognathic surgery (p=0.68) and the treatment plans in total (p=0.78) when compared with the standard treatment plan. The mean rate of agreement between the standard treatment plan and the academic and non-academic surgeons’ treatment plan for borderline class III patients was 75.0%±17.41% and 80.0%±17.73% for the orthodontic treatment plan, 80.0%±7.56% and 80.0%±17.73% for the surgical treatment plan, 70.55%±9.4% and 68.61%±9.08% for single or double jaw orthognathic surgery treatment plan, and 79.83%±7.76% and 80.63%±9.79% for the treatment plans in total, respectively.

Conclusion Academic and non-academic surgeons both showed higher agreements with the standard treatment plan when suggesting orthodontic and orthognathic surgery treatment plans for borderline class III patients.

Keywords:
  • Treatment Protocol
  • Angle Class III
  • Surgeons
  • PDF

How to Cite

Mirmohammadsadeghi, H., Bayatian, A., Allahyari, F., & Dashti, M. (2019). Comparison of academic and nonacademic surgeons in treatment planning for CIII borderline case. Journal of Dental School, 37(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v37i1.27169
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

References

Zere E, Chaudhari PK, Sharan J, Dhingra K, Tiwari N. Developing Class III malocclusions: challenges and solutions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 Jun 22;10:99-116.

Proffit WR, Jackson TH, Turvey TA. Changes in the pattern of patients receiving surgical-orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):793-8.

Proffit WR, White RP Jr .Combined surgical-orthodontic treatment: how did it evolve and what are the best practices now? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 May;147(5 Suppl):S205-15.

Mirhashemi AH, Parhiz AR. One jaw or two jaws? What is current trend among surgeons and orthodontists. J Craniomax Res 2014 (WINTER/SPRING 2014);1(1):21-4.

Benyahia H, Azaroual MF, Garcia C, Hamou E, Abouqal R, Zaoui R. Treatment of skeletal class III malocclusions: orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage? How to decide. Int Orthod. 2011 Jun;9(2):196-209.

Martinez P, Bellot-Arcis C, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes-Gallardo V. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;46(4):490-5.

Park JH, Yu J, Bullen R. Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with conventional orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr;151(4):804-11.

Gjørup H, Athanasiou AE . Soft-tissue and dento-skeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Oct;100(4):312-23.

Tseng YC, Pan CY, Chou ST, Liao CY, Lai ST, Chen CM, et al. Treatment of adult class III malocclusions with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: receiver operating characteristic analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 May;139(5):e485-93.

Todd S A, Hammond P, Hutton T, Cochrane S, Cunningham S. Perception of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions. Eur J Orthod. 2005 Aug;27(4):363-9.

Rabie ABM, Wong RWK, Min GU . Treatment in borderline class III malocclusion: orthodontic camouflage (extraction) versus orthognathic surgery. Open Dent J. 2008;2:38-48.

Howells DJ, Shaw WC. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod 1985;88: 402-408.

Eslami S, Faber J, Fateh A, Sheikholaemmeh F, Grassia V, Jamilian A. Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics. Prog Orthod 2018 Aug 2;19(1):28.

  • Abstract Viewed: 264 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 50 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Developed By

Open Journal Systems

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Make a Submission

Make a Submission
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

e-ISSN: 2645-4351

Creative Commons License

This journal is open access and available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

 
Powered by OJSPlus