Microleakage of Bulk-Fill Composites at Two Different Time Points
Journal of Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,
Vol. 34 No. 4 (2016),
6 March 2019
,
Page 225-234
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v34i4.24635
Abstract
Objectives: Microleakage is the main concern in composite restorations. This study aimed to compare the microleakage of two bulk-fill and one conventional composite at two different time points.
Methods: Class II cavities were prepared in 60 premolar teeth and divided into six groups of 20. Groups 1 and 4 were incrementally filled with Grandio composite. Groups 2 and 5 were filled with X-tra fil bulk-fill composite. Groups 3 and 6 were filled with Tetric-N-Ceram bulk-fill composite in one layer. The samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles between 25-55°C. In groups 1-3, the samples were incubated for 24 hours and then immersed in 1% methylene blue dye. Groups 4-6 were incubated for three months and then immersed in dye. All samples were mesiodistally sectioned and degree of microleakage was scored under a light microscope. The data were analyzed using Mann Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Results: The results showed no significant difference among groups 1-5 and 6 in terms of microleakage (P>0.05) but a significant difference was noted between groups 1 and 4 in this regard (P=0.01). The microleakage in groups 4-6 was higher than that in groups 1-3 (P=0.02). Also, microleakage in gingival margins was greater than that in occlusal margins (P=0.02).
Conclusion: The microleakage of bulk-fill composites is comparable to that of conventional composites both at 24 hours and three months after restoration.- Composite Resins
- Dental Leakage
- Time
How to Cite
References
Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Jan;17(1):227-35.
Moore BK, Platt JA, Borges G, Chu TM, KatsilieriI. Depth of cure of dental resin composites: ISO 4049 depth and microhardness of types of materials and shades. Oper Dent. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):408-12.
Uctasli S, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Effect of accelerated restorative techniques on the microleakage of Class II composites. Am J Dent. 2002 Jun;15(3):153-8.
Poggio C, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Mekler J, Colombo M. Microleakage in Class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: in vitro evaluation of different restorative techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Sep 1;18(5):e793-8.
Sadeghi M. The effect of fluid composite as gingival layer on microleakage of class II composite restorations. Dent. Res J. 2007 Spring-Summer;4:40–7.
Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in Cl II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Feb;85(2):177-83.
Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent. 1976 Sep;4(5):199–206.
Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent. 1997 Jul-Aug;22(4):173-85.
Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Mar;11(1):5-33.
Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent. 1997 Jul-Aug;22(4):173-85.
Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: Leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent. 1995 Jan-Feb;20(1):18-25.
Fabianelli A, Sgarra A, Goracci C, Cantoro A, Pollington S, Ferrari M. Microleakage in Class II restorations: Open vs closed centripetal build-up technique. Oper Dent. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):308-13.
Abd El Halim S, Zaki D. Comparative evaluation of microleakage among three different glass ionomertypes. Oper Dent. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):36-42.
Ernst CP, Galler P, Willershausen B, Haller B. Marginal integrity of class V restorations: SEM versus dye penetration. Dent Mater. 2008 Mar;24(3):319-27.
Bagheri M, Ghavamnasiri M. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Feb;9(2):122-9.
Dhingra V, Taneja S, Kumar M, KumariM. Influence of Fiber Inserts, Type of Composite, and Gingival Margin Location on the Microleakage in Class II Resin Composite Restorations. Oper Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):E9-15.
Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, et al. Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1):1-8.
Furness A, Tadros MY, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014 Apr;42(4):439-49.
Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):500-5.
Campos EA, Ardu S, Lefever D, Jassé FF, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Marginal adaptation of class II cavities restored with bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):575-81.
Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014 Aug;42(8):993-1000.
Rossouw RJ, Grobler SR, Theunis J, Kotze W. A comparison of microleakages of five different recent bonding agents/systems in enamel and dentine. SADJ. 2007 Jun;62(5):213, 216-8.
Alshali RZ, Silikas N, Satterthwaite JD.Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals. Dent Mater. 2013 Sep;29(9):e213-7.
- Abstract Viewed: 183 times
- PDF Downloaded: 92 times