Effect of Thermocycling and Type of Restorative Material on Microleakage of Class II Restorations
Journal of Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,
Vol. 34 No. 4 (2016),
6 March 2019
,
Page 202-213
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v34i4.24631
Abstract
Objectives: Microleakage is a major cause of failure of dental restorations and results in development of secondary caries, tooth hypersensitivity and pulp pathosis. This study aimed to compare the microleakage of class II cavities filled with two types of composite resins and a compomer and subjected to thermocycling.
Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, class II cavities with a gingival margin below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and beveled enamel margins were prepared in proximal surfaces of 60 molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 20 and restored with Spectrum TPH3 and Esthet X composites and Dyract eXtra compomer. Each group was randomly divided into two subgroups (n=10) of control and thermocycling (1000 thermal cycles). Dye penetration in occlusal and cervical margins was scored under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis test and Mann Whitney U test (P<0.05).
Results: No significant difference was noted in microleakage of the three groups neither in the occlusal nor in the cervical margins in presence or absence of thermocycling (P>0.05). But, the microleakage in the cervical margins of compomer restorations was slightly higher than that of other groups especially after thermocycling.
Conclusion: Microleakage of composite restorations was not significantly different from that of compomer restorations in the occlusal or gingival margins in presence or absence of thermocycling.
- Compomers
- Composite Resins
- Dental Leakage
How to Cite
References
Demir T, Tirali RE. Effects of different light sources on microleakage of cervical compomer restorations in primary teeth. Int J Clin Dent Sci. 2013;4:26-30.
Yadav G, Rehani U, Rana V. A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 May;5(2):101-7.
Mali P, Deshpande S, Singh A. Microleakage of restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Mar;24(1):15-8.
Sadeghi, M. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs. Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Apr-Jun;20(2):159-63.
Poggio C, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Mekler J, Colombo M. Microleakage in Class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: In vitro evaluation of different restorative techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Sep;18(5):e793-8.
Xie H, Zhang F, Wu Y, Chen C, Liu W. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement. Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):325-31.
Rekha CV, Varma B. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength and microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement and compomer: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Nov;3(3):282-7.
Singla A, Garg S, Jindal SK, Suma Sogi HP, Sharma D. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage using invasive and noninvasive technique of light cure glass ionomer and flowable polyacid modified composite resin used as pit and fissure sealant. Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;22(2):205-9.
Divya KT, Satish G, Srinivasa TS, Reddy V, Umashankar K, Rao BM. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four different restorative materials used as coronal sealants: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Jul;6(4):12-7.
Crim GA, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. Comparison of four thermocycling techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Jan;53(1):50-3.
Hassan LA, Ibraheem AF. The effect of thermocycling on microleakage analysis of bulk filled base composite in comparison to incrementally placed nanohybrid composite in class II MOD restorations (An in vitro study). JBCD. 2013 Sep; 25(3):28-34.
Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Von Hahen S. Microleakage of compomer class V restorations: effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Feb;83(2):194-203.
Sawani S, Arora V, Jaiswal S, Nikhil V. Comparative evaluation of microleakage in Class II restorations using open vs. closed centripetal build-up techniques with different lining materials. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jul;17(4):344-8.
Fabianelli A, Sgarr A, Goracci C, Cantoro A, Pollington S, Ferrari M. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique. Oper Dent. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):308-13.
Abd El Halim S, Zaki D. Comparative evaluation of microleakage among three different glass ionomer types. Oper Dent. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1):36-42.
Phanombualert J, Chimtim P, Heebthamai T, Weera-Archakul W. Microleakage of Self-Etch Adhesive System in Class V Cavities Prepared by Using Er: YAG Laser with Different Pulse Modes. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Sep;33(9):467-72.
Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Markl A. Marginal adaptation of class V restorations with and without 'soft start polymerization'. Oper Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;25(1):26-32.
Jawaed NU, Abidi SY, Qazi FU, Ahmed S. An in-vitro evaluation of microleakage at the cervical margin between two different class II restorative techniques using dye penetration method. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Sep;26(9):748-52.
Kader MA, Altheeb A, Al-Asmry AA, Luqman M. Microleakage evaluation of class II composite restoration with incremental and bulk fill technique. J Dent Res Rev. 2015;2(4):153-7.
Santini A, Ivanovic V, Tan CL, Ibbetson R. Effect of prolonged thermal cycling on microleakage around Class V cavities restored with glass-ceramic inserts with different coefficients of thermal expansion. An in vitro study. Prim Dent Care. 2006 Oct;13(4):147-53.
Wagner WC, Aksu MN, Neme AL, Linger JB, Pink FE, Walker S. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage. Oper Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):72-8.
Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo C, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:295-308.
Consani S, Sinhoreti MAC, Correr-Sobrinho L, Leite RSB, Bortoletto KJ. An alternative method for thermal cycling test: effect on the marginal microleakage and bond strength of dental polymer bonded to dentin. Mat Res. 2012 Sep;15(6):1045-9.
Demarco FF, Ramos OL, Mota CS, Formolo E, Justino LM. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum. Oper Dent. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):253-9.
Erdilek D, Dörter C, Koray F, Kunzelmann KH, Efes BG, Gomec Y. Effect of thermo-mechanical load cycling on microleakage in class II Ormocer restorations. Eur J Dent. 2009 Jul;3(3):200-5.
Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Comparison of shear bond strength of two self-etch primer/adhesive systems. Angle Orthod.
Jan;76(1):123-6.
Oliveira GUD, Mondelli RFL, Charantola Rodrigues M, Franco EB, Ishikiriama SK, Wang, L. Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):510-6.
Willershausen B, Callaway A, Ernst CP, Stender E. The influence of oral bacteria on the surface of resin-based dental restorative materials – an in vitro study. Int Dent J. 1999 Aug;49(4):231-9.
Yamamoto T, Hanabusa M, Momoi Y, Sakaguchi RL Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Polymerization stress of dental resin composite continues to develop 12 hours after irradiation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 Jan-Feb;27(1):44-54.
Lennon ÁM, Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Approximal caries development in surfaces in contact with fluoride‐releasing and non-fluoride-releasing restorative materials: an in situ study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2007 Dec;115(6):497-501.
Kugel G, Perry RD, Hoang E, Hoang T, Ferrari M. Dyract compomer: comparison of total etch vs. no etch technique. Gen Dent. 1998 Nov-Dec;46:604-6.
Rodrigues JA, De Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues Júnior AL. In vitro microleakage of glass-ionomer composite resin hybrid materials. Oper Dent. 1999 Mar-Apr;24(2):89-95.
Ajami B, Makarem A, Niknejad E. Microleakage of Class V Compomer and Light-Cured Glass Ionomer Restorations inYoung Premolar Teeth. J Mashhad Dent Sch. 2007;31(Special Issue):25-8.
Aguiar FH, Dos Santos AJ, França FM, Paulillo LA, Lovadino JR. A quantitative method of measuring the microleakage of thermocycled or non-thermocycled posterior tooth restorations. Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):793-9.
Rigsby DF, Retief DH, Bidez MW, Russell CM. Effect of axial load and temperature cycling on microleakage of resin restorations. Am J Dent. 1992 Jun;5(3):155-9.
Bedran-de-Castro AKB, Cardoso PEC, Ambrosano GMB, Pimenta LAF. Thermal and mechanical load cycling on microleakage and shear bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent. 2004 Jan-Feb;29(1):42-8.
- Abstract Viewed: 148 times
- PDF Downloaded: 63 times