Accuracy and characteristics of cephalometric software programs for outcome prediction of orthognathic treatments: A review
Journal of Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,
Vol. 35 No. 3 (2017),
5 Esfand 2019
,
Page 108-114
https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v35i3.24599
Abstract
Objectives: Several software programs have been designed for outcome prediction of orthodontic and surgical treatments. This study aimed to review the accuracy and characteristics of cephalometric software programs for outcome prediction of orthognathic surgeries.
Methods: This study reviewed studies that compared cephalometric software programs in terms of accuracy and characteristics for outcome prediction of orthognathic surgeries. The results of studies regarding some two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) software programs for this purpose were collected and reported.
Conclusion: Use of diagnostic software programs for prediction of treatment outcome is an inseparable part of orthognathic treatment. Some studies have reported acceptable diagnostic accuracy of these software programs and their optimal efficacy for guiding the patients towards accepting or rejecting a treatment. However, using the manual technique to demonstrate the outcome of orthognathic treatment is still efficacious. Several factors such as updating the primary versions, their compatibility with the new operating systems, education and customer service are important in continuation of use of these software programs.
- Software
- Orthognathic Surgery
- Decision Support Techniques
How to Cite
References
Cohen MI. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod. 1965 May;51:368-79.
McNeil WR, White RP. Cephalometric prediction for orthodontic surgery. Angle Orthod. 1972 Apr;42(2):154-64.
Henderson D. The assessment and management of bony deformities of the middle and lower face. Br J Plast Surg. 1974 Jul;27(3):287-96.
Kinnbrew MC, Hoffman DR, Carlton DM. Projecting the soft tissue outcome of surgical and orthodontic manipulation of the maxillofacial skeleton. Am J Orthod 1983 Dec;84(6):508-19.
Harradine WT, Birnie DJ. Computerized prediction of the results of orthognathic surgery. J Maxfacial Surg 1985 Dec;13:245-9.
Kaipatur N, Al-Thomali Y, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of Computer Programs in Predicting Orthognathic Surgery Hard Tissue Response. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009 Aug;67(8):1628-39.
Loh S, Heng JK, Ward-Booth P, Winchester L, McDonald F. A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2001 Aug;30(4):259-63.
Konstiantos KA, O'Reilly MT, Close J. The validity of the prediction of soft tissue profile changes after Le Fort I osteotomy using the dentofacial planner. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994 Mar;105:241-8.
Jacobson R, Sarver DM. The predictability of maxillary repositioning in Le Fort I orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002 Aug;122(2):142-54.
Syliangco ST, Sameshima GT, Kaminishi RM, Sinclair PM. Predicting soft tissue changes in mandibular advancement surgery: a comparison of two video-imaging systems. Angle Orthod 1997 Oct;67:337-46.
Sinclair PM, Kilpelainen P, Phillips C, White RP, Rogers L, Sarver DM. The accuracy of video imaging in orthognathicial surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995 Feb;107:177-85.
Donatsky O, Bjorn-Jorgensen J, Holmqvist-Larsen M, Hillerup S. Computerized cephalometric evaluation of orthognathic surgical precision and stability in relation to maxillary superior repositioning combined with mandibular advancement or setback. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997 Oct;55(10):1071-9.
Harradine WT, Birnie DJ. Computerized prediction of the results of orthognathic surgery. J Maxfac Surg 1985 Dec;13:245-249.
Harris M, Reynolds IR. Cephalometric analysis. In: Fundamentals of orthognathic surgery. London, WB Saunders, 1991:38-48.
Power G, Breckon J, Sherriff M, McDonald F. Dolphin imaging software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2005 Sep;34(6):619-26.
Smith JD, Thomas PM, Proffit WR. A comparison of current prediction imaging programs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2004 May;125:527-36.
Resnick CM, Dang RR, Glick SJ, Padwa BL. Accuracy of three-dimensional soft tissue prediction for Le Fort I osteotomy using Dolphin 3D software: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016 Nov; 14. pii: S0901-5027(16)30289-2.
Nadjmi N, Tehranchi A, Azami N, Saedi B, Mollemanse W. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2013 Nov;144(5):654-62.
Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD, Lee KJ, Baike HS. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006 May;129:600.e23-600.e34
Hing NR. The accuracy of computer generated prediction of the results of orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Dec;13(6):245-9.
Prisse LA, Courvoisier DS, Scolozzi P. Did the hand drawn cephalometric tracing technique for orthognathic surgery planning say its last word? Objective and subjective evaluation. J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jul;24(4):e320-5.
Akhoundi A, Shirani G, Arshad M, Heidar H, Sodagar A. Comparison of an imaging software and manual prediction of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. J Dent (Tehran) 2012 Summer;9(3):178-87.
Gennaro P, Chisci G, Aboh IK, Gabriele G, Cascino F. Comparative Study in Orthognathic Surgery Between Dolphin Imaging Software and Manual Prediction. J Craniofac Surg 2014 Jul;25(4):1577-8.
Peterman RJ, Jiang S, Johe R, Mukherjee PM. Accuracy of Dolphin visual treatment objective (VTO) prediction software on class III patients treated with maxillary advancement and mandibular setback. Prog Orthod 2016 Dec;17(1):1-9.
Magro-Filho O, Magro-E´rnica N, Queiroz TP, Aranega AM, Garcia Jr IR. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010 Apr;137:452.e1-452.e5.
Nam KU, Hong J. Is Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Prediction by Software Accurate? J Craniofac Surg 2015 Nov;26(8):e729-33.
Upton PM, Sadowsky PL, Sarver DM, Heaven TJ. Evaluation of video imaging prediction in combined maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997 Dec;112:656-65.
Quast DC, Biggerstaff RH, Haley JV. The short and long-term soft-tissue profile changes accompanying mandible advancement surgery. Am J Orthod. 1983 Jul;84(1):29-36.
Darmaut LR, De Smitt AA. Effect of sagittal split advancement osteotomy on facial profiles. Eur J Orthod. 1989 Nov;11(4):366-74.
Cousley RRJ, Grant E, Kindelan JD. The validity of computerized orthognathic predictions. J Orthod. 2003 Jun;30(2):149-54.
Kaipatur N, Al-Thomali Y, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of Computer Programs in Predicting Orthognathic Surgery Hard Tissue Response. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1628-39.
Sarver DM, Johnston MW, Maturas VJ. Video imaging for planning and counseling in ortho surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Nov;46(11):939-45.
Pospisil OA. Reliability and feasibility of prediction tracing in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1987 Apr;15(2):79-83.
Phillips C, Hill BJ, Cannac C. The influence of video imaging on patient's perceptions and expectations. Angle Orthod 1995 Aug;65(4):263-70.
- Abstract Viewed: 188 times
- PDF Downloaded: 108 times