Guarantees Governing Judge’s Independence in the Light of the Charter of Citizenship Rights
Akhlāq-i zīstī i.e., Bioethics Journal,
Vol. 8 No. 1 (1397),
2 November 2018
,
Page 261-271
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v8i1.33240
Abstract
Background and Aim: The law creates rights and obligations for everyone against each other by setting fixed criteria. An organization with an impartial structure is necessary to guarantee the rights of citizens in addition to the judge’s independence for, on the one hand to prosecute and punish those who violate the rights of others by violating these criteria and on the other hand to prevent that any claim against the person bothers him and ignores his individual and social rights and let end his punishment. The purpose of this article is to investigate the effect of structural factors on the judge’s independence in the light of the charter of citizenship rights.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical article has been written in a library method by taking notes and collecting information.
Findings: Usually the existence of rules and regulations that are fair and appropriate to social needs and in harmony with the lofty purpose of life, as well as the health of the judge's personality and purity of conscience and the correctness of his perceptions are taken for granted, but the debate on the judiciary independence will be complete and efficient when the nature of the law and its role in the order of today's societies and the criteria for recognizing the judge’s importance and competence and its impact on the functioning of the judiciary are explored. Because not paying attention to these two issues in examining the concept of judiciary independence and implementing it in the community in the best case will lead to the judge’s governance over the fate of affairs within framework of the law.
Conclusion: The highest values are equality and justice and judges are the main guardians of justice. When a judge is independent, in fact, no one interferes in his work, so citizens’ rights are respected. In fact, judge’s independence includes personal and institutional relations and it is structural independence in the face of pressure from litigants and government officials and internal independence refers to mechanisms related to protecting the judges’ independence from the pressure that may be exerted by the judiciary itself.
Please cite this article as: Beyranvand R, Mirkamali SA, Rajabi A. Guarantees Governing Judge’s Independence in the Light of the Charter of Citizenship Rights. Bioethics Journal, Special Issue on Citizenship Rights, Autumn 2018; 261-271.
- Judge’s Independence; Guarantees of Judge’s Independence; Charter of Citizenship Rights
How to Cite
References
Moin M. Farhang-e Loghat. 3rd ed. Tehran: Zarrin Publications; 2007. p.2614. [Persian]
Fazaeli M. Fair Trial. Tehran: Shahr-e Danesh, Institute for Legal Studies and Research Publications; 2008. p.180. [Persian]
Amid H. Farhang Amid. 38th ed. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publications; 2011. p.131. [Persian]
Mansouri J. Farhang Esteghlal. Tehran: Office of Political and International Studies; 1995. p.54. [Persian]
Nouri MH. Mustadrak al-Wasa'il wa Mustanbat al-Masa'il. Qom: Al-Bayt Institute Publications; 1987. p.33. [Arabic]
Akhoondi M. Criminal Procedure Code. Volume 1 of the Printing and Publishing Organization of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. 13th ed. Tehran: New Plan Publications; 2011. p.299. [Persian]
Aramesh R. Andisheh: Legal Pathology: Independence of Judge and Judiciary. Advocacy Magazine 2001; 4(9): 14-18. [Persian]
Hashemi SM. Constitutional Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 19th ed. Tehran: Mizan Publishing; 2007. Vol.2 p.371. [Persian]
Rasekh M. Hagh va Mosleftaf Articles in Philosophy of Value. 1st ed. Tehran: New Plan Publications; 2002. p.79. [Persian]
Naji Zavareh M. Impartial Trial in Criminal Matters. Tehran: Publications of the Institute of Legal Studies and Research; 2010. p.180. [Persian]
Hashemi SM. Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1st ed. Tehran: Mizan Publishing; 2005. p.293. [Persian]
Katozian N. Philosophy of Law (Law Logic). Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh Publications; 2019. Vol.3 p.378. [Persian]
Kashani SM. International Standards of Justice. Tehran: Mizan Publications; 2004. p.53. [Persian]
Tabatabai Motameni M. Public Freedoms and Human Rights. Tehran: University Press; 2003. Ch.3 p.354. [Persian]
Najafi MH. Jawaher al-Kalam fi Sharh Sharia al-Islam. Tehran: Islamic Library; 1988. Vol.40 p.402. [Arabic]
Ashouri M. Criminal Procedure. Organization for the Study and Compilation of University Humanities Books. 8th ed. Tehran: Samat; 2007. Vol.2 p.10. [Persian]
Shams A. Civil Procedure. 8th ed. Tehran: Drak Publications; 2005. Vol.1 p.17. [Persian]
Katozian N. Generalities of Law, General Theory. 2nd ed. Tehran: Publishing Company; 2005. p.110. [Persian]
- Abstract Viewed: 524 times
- pdf (فارسی) Downloaded: 80 times