تبیین مدل معادلات ساختاری پایداری خانواده بر اساس شناخت اجتماعی و عشق با میانجیگری مهارتهای ارتباطی در شهر تهران
مجله اخلاق زیستی- علمی پژوهشی,
دوره 13 شماره 38 (1402),
28 May 2023
,
صفحه 1-21
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v13i38.40900
چکیده
زمینه و هدف: خانواده به عنوان پایدارترین واحد اجتماعی، منبع اصلی رشد فردی و محوری اساسی برای عملکرد سالم افراد و جامعه میباشد. با توجه به اهمیت خانواده مطالعات بسیاری در ارتباط با آن انجام شده است که البته بیشتر آنها بر متغیرهایی تمرکز کردهاند که مایه ازهمپاشیدن خانواده هستند. این مقاله در وضعیت فقدان شدید پژوهشهای مرتبط با پایداری خانواده به طرح این پرسش پرداخت که آیا میتوان بر اساس شناخت اجتماعی و عشق با میانجیگری مهارتهای ارتباطی، پایداری خانواده را پیشبینی نمود؟
روش: پژوهش حاضر، پیمایشی از نوع همبستگی (تبین مدل معادلات ساختاری) بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل شهروندان شهر تهران بود که 400 نفر از آنها به صورت نمونهگیری تصادفی خوشهای چندمرحلهای انتخاب شد. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات شامل پرسشنامه محققساخته پایداری خانواده، شناخت اجتماعی و مهارتهای ارتباطی و پرسشنامه عشق Sternberg بود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها از نرمافزار SPSS 26 و AMOS 23 استفاده شد.
ملاحظات اخلاقی: در تدوین این مقاله جنبههای اخلاقی شامل حفظ اصالت متون، صداقت و امانتداری و رضایت و اطلاعرسانی، رعایت شده است. همچنین کلیه پرسشنامهها بدون نام و اطلاعات شخصی افراد تکمیل گردیده است.
یافتهها: یافتههای همبستگی نشان داد که به ترتیب شناخت اجتماعی، مهارتهای ارتباطی و عشق همبستگی مثبت و معنیداری با پایداری خانواده دارند. همچنین شناخت اجتماعی و عشق همبستگی مثبت و معنیداری با مهارتهای ارتباطی دارند. دادههای مدل نیز نشان داد که شاخصهای CFI و NFI به ترتیب در مدل برابر 999/0 و 995/0 هستند که نشاندهنده برازش قابل قبول مدل میباشند. مقدار RMSEA برابر است با 077/0 و مقدار کمتر از 08/0 که به معنای برازش خوب است. GFI نیز برابر 996/0 میباشد که نشانگر برازش مطلوب است، در نتیجه از تمامی شاخصها اینطور استنباط میشود که مدل پژوهش برازش مطلوبی دارد.
نتیجهگیری: با افزایش هر یک از متغیرهای شناخت اجتماعی، عشق و مهارتهای ارتباطی، پایداری خانواده افزایش مییابد.
- پایداری خانواده
- شناخت اجتماعی
- عشق
- مهارتهای ارتباطی
- اصلاح کیفیت زندگی
ارجاع به مقاله
مراجع
Ogwo A. Adolescents-parent relationships as perceived by younger and older adolescents: Child & adolescent therapy and e-therapy. IFE Psycholog IA: An International Journal. 2013; 21(3): 224-249.
Locke HJ, Williamson RC. Marital adjustment: A factor analysis study. American Sociological Review. 1958; 23(5): 562-569.
Bidandi F, Roman N. Social Cohesion as an External Factor Affecting Families: An Analysis of the White Paper on Families in South Africa. Southern African Journal of Social Work and Social Development. 2020; 32(3): 1-17.
de Lima Silva V, de Medeiros CA, Guerra GC, Ferreira PH, de Araújo Júnior RF, de Araújo Barbosa SJ, et al. Quality of life, integrative community therapy, family support and satisfaction with health services among elderly adults with and without symptoms of depression. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2017; 88(2): 359-369.
Johnson MD, Nguyen L, Anderson JR, Liu W, Vennum A. Pathways to romantic relationship success among Chinese young adult couples: Contributions of family dysfunction, mental health problems and negative couple interaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2015; 32(1): 5-23.
Markson L, Lamb ME, Lösel F. The impact of contextual family risks on prisoners' children's behavioural outcomes and the potential protective role of family functioning moderators. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2016; 13(3): 325-340.
Roman NV, Schenck C, Ryan J, Brey F, Henderson N, Lukelelo N, et al. Relational aspects of family functioning and family satisfaction with a sample of families in the Western Cape. Social Work. 2016; 52(3): 303-312.
Satir V. The new peoplemaking. Palo Alto, California: Science & Behavior Books; 1988.
IRNA News Agency (2022). Out of every three marriages in 2021, one case resulted in divorce. Available at: https://www.irna.ir. [Persian]
Young Journalists' Club (2019). Which provinces had the highest number of marriages and divorces in 2019. Available at: https://www.yjc.ir. [Persian]
Nimtz MA. Satisfaction and contributing factors in satisfying long-term marriage: A phenomenological study. Lynchburg: Liberty University; 2011.
Kaslow F, Robison JA. Long-term satisfying marriages: Perceptions of contributing factors. American Journal of Family Therapy. 1996; 24(2): 153-170.
Hopkins-Williams KD. "Yes they're out there": A qualitative study on strong African American marriages. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College; 2007.
al-Saʿdāwī N, ʿIzzat HR. Women, religion and morals. Damascus: Dar al-Fikr; 2008. [Arabic]
Michalitsianos N. Resiliency: A resource for promoting marriage satisfaction. Doctoral Dissertation. Union, New Jersey: Kean University; 2014.
Yanagisako SJ. Family and household: the analysis of domestic groups. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1979; 8(1): 161-205.
Kaslow NJ, Celano M, Dreelin ED. A cultural perspective on family theory and therapy. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1995; 18(3): 621-633.
Walsh F. Normal family processes. New York: Guilford Press; 1982.
Baldridge S. Family stability and childhood behavioral outcomes: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Family Strengths. 2011; 11(1): 1-24.
Olson DH, DeFrain JD, Olson AK. Building relationships: Developing skills for life. Saint Paul: Life Innovations Inc; 1998.
Olson DH, DeFrain JD. Marriages and families: Intimacy, strengths and diversity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
Olson DH. Clinical assessment and treatment interventions using the family circumplex model. Edited by Kaslow FW. Handbook of relational diagnosis and dysfunctional family patterns. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
Olson DH. Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Assessing family functioning. Edited by Walsh F. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 1993.
Olson DH. Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy. 2000; 22(2): 144-167.
Baron‐Cohen S. Autism: the empathizing-systemizing (E‐S) theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009; 1156(1): 68-80.
Baron‐Cohen S, Jolliffe T, Mortimore C, Robertson M. Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1997; 38(7): 813-822.
Baron-Cohen S. Theory of mind and autism: A review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation. 2000; 23: 169-184.
Razza RA, Blair C. Associations among false-belief understanding, executive function and social competence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2009; 30(3): 332-343.
Crick NR, Dodge KA. A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin. 1994; 115(1): 74-101.
Couture SM, Granholm EL, Fish SC. A path model investigation of neurocognition, theory of mind, social competence, negative symptoms and real-world functioning in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 2011; 125(2-3): 152-160.
Dimaggio G, Lysaker PH, Carcione A, Nicolò G, Semerari A. Know yourself and you shall know the other… to a certain extent: multiple paths of influence of self-reflection on mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition. 2008; 17(3): 778-789.
Uekermann J, Kraemer M, Abdel-Hamid M, Schimmelmann BG, Hebebrand J, Daum I, et al. Social cognition in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2010; 34(5): 734-743.
Newen A, Vogeley K, Zinck A. Social cognition, emotion and self-consciousness: A preface. Conscious Cogn. 2008; 17(2): 409-410.
Leslie AM, Friedman O, German TP. Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2004; 8(12): 528-533.
Abdi M, Nejati V, Zabihzadeh A, Mohseni M, Mohammadi R. Comparison of empathy and mind reading abilities in couples seeking divorce and normal group. Journal of Thought & Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2013; 7(25): 67-76. [Persian]
Mofradnejad N, Monadi M. The comparison of social cognition and fear of negative evaluation in divorce seeking women and normal women. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological. 2018; 16(1): 69-86. [Persian]
Pourmirzaei M, Bagheri M, Faziletpour M. The Relationship between Mind Reading and Marital Satisfaction with Mediating Role of General Health. Journal of Research in Behavioral Sciences. 2017; 15(3): 299-305. [Persian]
Karney BR, Gauer B. Cognitive complexity and marital interaction in newlyweds. Personal Relationships. 2010; 17(2): 181-200.
Duffy SM, Rusbult CE. Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Homosexuality. 1986; 12(2): 1-23.
Sprecher S. "I love you more today than yesterday": Romantic partners' perceptions of changes in love and related affect over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999; 76(1): 46-53.
Gao G. Intimacy, passion and commitment in Chinese and US American romantic relationships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2001; 25(3): 329-342.
Asodo K, Aron FE. Marital satisfaction. J Psychol Soc. 2009; 67: 15-28.
Naderi F, Heidarei AR, Hosseinzadeh Maleki Z. The relationship between knowledge and sexual attitude, components of love and marital satisfaction with spousal abuse in married employees of government offices in Ahvaz. Women and Culture. 2009; 1(1): 28-45. [Persian]
Arianfar N, Rasouli R. Structural Equation Modeling of the Predicting Marital Satisfaction on The Health of The Main Family and The Mediatory Variable of Lovemaking Styles. Journal of Woman and Family Studies. 2019; 7(1): 139-157. [Persian]
Dion KK, Dion KL. Psychological individualism and romantic love. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1991; 6(1): 17-33.
Maleki B, Jadidian A. The relationship between marital satisfaction of married women and elements of love making styles. Applied Studies in Social Sciences and Sociology. 2020; 11(3): 15-26. [Persian]
Ahmetoglu G, Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T. The relationship between dimensions of love, personality and relationship length. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2010; 39(5): 1181-1190.
Lemieux R, Hale JL. Cross-sectional analysis of intimacy, passion and commitment: Testing the assumptions of the triangular theory of love. Psychological Reports. 2002; 90(3): 1009-1014.
Robinson MD, Persich MR, Sjoblom-Schmidt S, Penzel IB. Love stories: how language use patterns vary by relationship quality. Discourse Processes. 2020; 57(1): 81-98.
Nouri N, Ramezan N. Prediction of Love story based on defense mechanisms and self-concept. Journal of Family Research. 2019; 14(3): 345-361. [Persian]
Lewandowski Jr GW, Nardone N, Raines AJ. The role of self-concept clarity in relationship quality. Self and Identity. 2010; 9(4): 416-433.
Berko R, Wolvin A, Wolvin DR, Ryan C. Communicating: A social and career focus. Handbook of instructional options with test items. New York, NY: Routledge; 1995.
Sajjadipour FS. The effectiveness of communication skills training based on the World health organization program on the level of adaptation of female high school students in day-to-day welfare centers in Tehran province. Thesis. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaei University; 2007. [Persian]
Berko R, Aitken JE, Wolvin A. ICOMM: Interpersonal concepts and competencies: Foundations of interpersonal communication. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2010.
Vohs KD, Finkel EJ. Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2006.
Honeycutt JM, Pence ME, Gearhart CC. Using imagined interactions to predict covert narcissism. Communication Reports. 2013; 26(1): 26-38.
Damghanian H, Yazdaniziarat M. Explaining the Model of Intrapersonal Communication Competence Encouraging Positive and Effective Relationship in Organizations from the perspective of the Academic Experts. Positive Psychology Research. 2017; 2(4): 19-38. [Persian]
Bagherinia H. The relationship between self-concept and positive feeling to spouse with marital satisfaction among married women in Education Department of Bojnord city. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2017; 19(Special Issue May and June): 367-373. [Persian]
Schultz NC, Schultz CL. Self-concept, marital satisfaction and family well-being. Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and Family. 1989; 10(2): 87-92.
Meeks BS, Hendrick SS, Hendrick C. Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1998; 15(6): 755-773.
Oberholzer C. The role of Neuro Linguistic Programming in improving organisational leadership through intrapersonal communication development. Doctoral Dissertation. Hatfield: University of Pretoria; 2014.
Mirzaie KH. Research, Researching and Writing. Tehran: Sociologists Publications; 2009. [Persian]
Waltz CF, Bausell BR. Nursing research: Design statistics and computer analysis. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 1981.
Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. The American Journal of Medicine. 2006; 119(2): 166-e7-16.
Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975; 28(4): 563-575.
Lemie R, Hale JL. Cross-sectional analysis of intimacy, passion and commitment, the assumption of the triangular theory of love. Psychol Rep. 2002; 90(3): 109-114.
Engel G, Olson KR, Patrick C. The personality of love: Fundamental motives and traits related to components of love. Personality and Individual Differences. 2002; 32(5): 839-853.
Mashak R. Relationship of love components with marital satisfaction in Ahwaz Islamic Azad University married students. Journal of Woman and Culture. Journal of Woman Cultural Psychology. 2010; 1(2): 83-97. [Persian]
- چکیده مشاهده شده: 21 بار
- PDF دانلود شده: 11 بار