بررسی مؤلفههای اخلاق پژوهشی اعضای هیأتعلمی علوم انسانی دانشگاه ارومیه
مجله اخلاق زیستی- علمی پژوهشی,
دوره 10 شماره 35 (1399),
1 تیر 2020
,
صفحه 1-11
https://doi.org/10.22037/bioeth.v10i35.30295
چکیده
زمینه و هدف: رعایت اخلاق از جمله عواملی است که در فرآیندهای پژوهش اهمیت به سزایی دارد. هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی مؤلفههای اخلاق پژوهشی اعضای هیأتعلمی علوم انسانی دانشگاه ارومیه است.
مواد و روشها: پژوهش حاضر به روش توصیفی ـ پیمایشی، روی 73 نفر اعضای هیأتعلمی علوم انسانی دانشگاه ارومیه انجام گرفت. نمونهگیری به روش تصادفی ساده انجام شد. ابزار جمعآوری دادهها پرسشنامه محققساخته بود که روایی محتوای آن با نظر متخصصان و روایی سازه آن به وسیله تحلیل عاملی تأیید شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها و اطلاعات پژوهش از نرمافزار تحلیل آماری SPSS 21 استفاده شد.
یافتهها: نتایج نشان داد که اخلاق پژوهشی اعضای هیأتعلمی علوم انسانی دانشگاه ارومیه از وضعیت مطلوب برخوردار است (P<0/05، M=3/07). همچنین نتایج نشان داد که مؤلفههای رعایت حقوق مشارکتکنندگان و حقوق مالکیت فکری از وضعیت مطلوب برخوردارند (P<0/05)، اما مؤلفههای پرهیز از دستکاری تحقیق و پرهیز از رابطهگرایی در تحقیق از وضعیت نامطلوبی برخوردارند (P<0/05).
ملاحظات اخلاقی: این پژوهش تمامی منابع مورد استفاده بر اساس اصول اخلاق پژوهشی بوده و حقوق مالکیت فکری نویسندگان و مشارکتکنندگان در فرآیند پژوهش رعایت شده است.
نتیجهگیری: به طور کلی میتوان نتیجه گرفت که اعضای هیأتعلمی علوم انسانی دانشگاه ارومیه اصول اخلاقی را در حد متوسط رعایت میکنند.
- اخلاق، پژوهش، علوم انسانی، آموزش عالی
ارجاع به مقاله
مراجع
Arianpour M, Mehrabi N. Obligations and Strategies of Professional Ethic in Higher Education System. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology 2017; 11(4): 17-23. [Persian]
Islamian H, Moradi Doliskani M. Identifying the components and indicators of research ethics in higher education and analyzing them in the sources of Persian research method. Higher Education Journal 2018; 5(3): 31-67. [Persian]
Simeon EH. The introduction of research ethics review procedures at a university in South Africa: Review outcomes of a social science research ethics committee. Research Ethics Journal 2020; 16(1-2): 1-26.
Kaewkungwal J, Adams P. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: an online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand. Accountability in Research Journal 2019; 4(13): 32-44.
Yemeni Douzi Sorkhabi M, Ali Khaki S. Investigating the Status of Observance of Research Ethics in Research Experiments Thesis of Master's Degree Students in Technical and Engineering at Tehran State Universities. Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Higher Education Association 2014; 6(2): 21-51. [Persian].
Chervenak FA, Chervenak MD, Mc Cullough LB. Ethics of Research in Perinatal Medicine. Journal of Seminars in Perinatalogy 2009; 3(3): 391-396.
Esposito A. Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: issues arising from hypothetical study on MOOC. Electronic Journal of E-Leaening 2012; 10(3): 13-28.
Kouchaki AR, Nasiri Mahallati M, Ghorbani R, Khorram Del S. 30 years of agricultural research in Iran; a study of the ethics of research. Journal of Agricultural Ecology 2013; 5(4): 395-405. [Persian]
Parveen H, Showkat N. Research Ethics. Accountability Journal 2017; 4(4): 53-68.
Pimple KD. Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics 2002; 2(8): 191-205.
Sleem H, Abdelhai R, Abdelhai A, Abdallat I, Al-Naif M, Mansourgabr H, et al. Development of an Accessible Self-Assessment Tool for Research Ethics Committees in Developing Countries. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2012; 2(5): 85-99.
Khanifar H, Bordbar H, Foroghi Gomi F. Explain Cultural and Ethical components in research. Journal of Marifat Akhlaqi 2011; 2(2): 85-104. [Persian]
Hilditch WG, Pace N. Ethics of research. Journal of Ethical and Legal 2006; 4(2): 110-113.
Shaw IF. Ethics in the Qualitative Research and Evaluation. Journal of Social Work 2003; 3(9): 9-29.
Tsan MF, Nguyen Y. Improving compliance with institutional review board continuing review requirements. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2019; 14(4): 365-371.
Larijani A, Zahedi MB, Asghari F. Ethics in Genetic Research, Special Issue. Journal of Ethics in Clinical Medical Research 2004; 4(4):71-82. [Persian]
Bahadori Nejad M. Tips on Engineering Ethics. Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology 2006; 2(1): 1-12. [Persian]
Horri A, Shahbadaghi A. Citation in scientific works (holes and challenges). Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences 2013; 2(2): 65-95. [Persian]
Pir Alaei E, Sheikh Alizadeh M. Investigating the Status of Research Ethics Members of the Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences of the Northwestern State Universities. Journal of Bioethics 2017; 4(2): 55-67. [Persian]
Sheikhalizadeh M, Piralaiy E, Fard AM. A study ofstatus of the research ethics compliance among physical education academic members of Islamic Azad University in reigns 2 & 13. European Journal of Experimental Biology 2013; 3(1): 568-571.
Agoritsas T, Perneger V. Patient-reported Conformity of Informed Consent Procedures and Participation in Clinical Research. QJM 2010; 104(2): 151-159.
Nafez Abu T, Zaid A, Karem H, Wael K. The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: A crosssectional study Tarboush et al. BMC Medical Education 2020; 7(2): 39-52.
Ordou F, Arabzadeh E. Providing an Ethical Questionnaire in Research. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology 2019; 14(1): 131-136. [Persian]
Vahed GH, Ghalavandi H, Ghalei A, Mohammadi H. Design and Psychometry of a Tool for Evaluating Professional Ethics of Faculty Members. Bioethics Journal 2019; 9(33): 21-29. [Persian]
Ghaderi M, Salimi M, Bolandhematan K. Awareness and Consideration Faculty Members and Post-Graduate Students to Ethical Standards in Research. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology 2016; 10(4): 85-87. [Persian]
Tabei SZ, Mahmoudian F. The scourge and vulnerability of research. Quarterly Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology 2006; 2(4): 50-62. [Persian]
Center of planning and Research Policy. Charter and the principles of research ethics. Tehran: Research and Technology Vice President, Ministry of Science. Journal of Research and Technology 2012; 5(9): 69-78. [Persian]
Ghasemi AA, Emami Meybodi R. The role and position of interdisciplinary studies in the growth and development of the country's humanities. Quarterly Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities 2015; 7(4): 1-19. [Persian]
Amin Khandaghi M, Pak Mehr H. Teaching Research Ethics Criteria: An Undeniable Necessity in Higher Education Curricula. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology 2012; 7(4): 1-13. [Persian]
Javadi M. The New World of Research Ethics, in Research Ethics: Fundamentals and Principles. Tehran: Research Institute for Cultural Studies and Humanities Publisher; 2011. [Persian]
Nowkarizi M, Amiri O, Kiani MR. Analysis of the structural quality of articles published in Iranian scientific medical journals based on the Standard of International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences 2014; 21(1): 111-122. [Persian]
Adeniyi EO, Taiwo SA. A Study of Incidence and Prevalence of Academic Dishonesty among Nigerian College of Education Students. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2011; 4(2): 12-31.
Alam LS. Is plagiarism more prevalent in some forms of assessment than others?’ Jadda: 21st ASCILITE Conference; 2004. p.48‐57.
Fealy S, Bighlari N, Pezeshki Rad G. Agricultural Students’ Attitude and Behavior on Plagiarism in Tarbiat Modares University. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education 2012; 18(3): 133-151. [Persian]
Adibi P, Kiyanpour M, Shirani SH. Root Analysis of Multiple Publishing Research Papers. Journal of Isfahan School of Pioneering 2009; 2(7): 34-51. [Persian]
Lashkaree Blouki M. Framework for Developing Values and Professional Ethics for.Scientific and Technological Research. Journal of Ethics in Science and Technology 2008; 3(2): 1-2. [Persian]
Motalebi Fard AR, Arasteh HR, Mohabbat H, Dasta M. Research Ethics in Higher Education Individual Features and Professional Responsibilities of Researchers. Quarterly Journal of Science 2012; 5(3): 19-96. [Persian]
Broom A. Ethical Issues in Social Research. Journal of Complementary Therapies in Medicinal 2006; 14(2): 151-169.
- چکیده مشاهده شده: 182 بار
- pdf دانلود شده: 42 بار