Probiotic Wheat Drinks: Study of Secondary Metabolites and Bioactive Compounds
Applied Food Biotechnology,
Vol. 10 No. 4 (2023),
25 September 2023
,
Page 233-243
https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v10i4.42630
Abstract
Abstract
Background and Objective: Nowadays, there are a wide variety of probiotic beverages made from animal-derived ingredients that contain beneficial microorganisms for human health. In contrast, probiotic beverages made from plant-based sources are much less common, despite their organic acids, which are biologically active substances. The aim of the study was to quantitatively assess the concentration of secondary metabolites of yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in a fermented grain drinks, as well as sensory characteristics of the drinks.
Material and Methods: Probiotic beverage samples were produced wheat as their primary grain ingredient. Fermentation process involved use of various lactic acid bacteria strains, including Lactobacillus delbrueckii, Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus buchneri, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus fermentum as well as various strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts. Additionally, commercially manufactured soft drinks made from grain-based ingredients were used as the basis for the comparison. Contents and concentrations of organic acids were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography, following the guidelines by the government standard. This technique involved separation of specific organic acids on a solid support using reversed-phase mechanism.
Results and Conclusion: The probiotic wheat drink contained 1300 mg.dm-3 lactic acid, suggesting the presence of lactic acid fermentation. Detection of citric and succinic acids of respectively 80 and 152 mg.dm-3 indicated heteroenzymatic nature of lactic acid fermentation. Therefore, development of aromas described as clove, fruity and banana-like was expected, generally considered favorable in the context of probiotic wheat drinks. Data make it possible to predict creation of the flavor profiles of fermented drinks from vegetable raw materials using complex combinations of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Biologically active substances
- LAB
- Yeasts
How to Cite
References
Steinkraus K. Lactic acid fermentation in the production of foods from vegetables, cereals and legumes. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1983; 49(3): 337-348.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00399508
Caplice E. Food fermentations: role of microorganisms in food production and preservation. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999; 50(1-2):131-149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00082-3
Recommended Levels of Consumption of Food and Biologically Active substances. Guidelines. MR 2.3.1.1915-04. Moscow; 2004:1- 6
Burlaka S, Alekseev A, Muzychenko G. Improving the technology of beverages using organic acids as food additives. Innovative Tech Modern Sci. 2017; 3: 22-24.
Massoud R, Fadaei V, Khosravi-Darani K. The effect of homogenization pressure and stages on the amounts of lactic and acetic acids of probiotic yoghurt. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2014; 2(1): 25-29.
https://doi.org/10.22037/afb.v2i1.7209
Starichenko A, Serdyuchenko I. Organic acids in our lives. New Sci: Current Stat and Develop. 2017; 1(1-2):7-10.
Chasovshchikov A, Pomozova, V, Khodzhamkulov A, Khorun-zhin S, Fedyushkina I. The composition of the organic acids of beverages on grain raw materials. Technique Technol Food Prod. 2011; 4(23): 126-130
Kamenskaya E, Obrezkova M. The use of probiotic micro-organisms in the technology of preparation of fermentation kvass. Tech Com Sci Innov Food Prod. 2015; 6(35): 24-29.
Ponomareva O, Borisova E, Prokhorchik I. Lactic acid bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus in the formation of sour ales flavor profile. Food Proc Techniq Technol. 2019; 10; 48(2):100-108.
https://doi.org/10.21603/2074-9414-2018-2-100-108
Cerning J. Exocellular polysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Let. 1990; 87(1-2): 113-130.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04883.x
Françoise C, Desroche N, Magali D, Raphaelle T, Laurent D, Guzzo J. A new approach for selection of Oenococcus oeni strains in order to produce malolactic starters. 2005; 105(3): 463-470.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.04.023
Nielsen J, Richelieu M. Control of flavor development in wine during and after Malolactic fermentation by Oenococcus oeni. Appl Environm Microbiol. 1999; 65(2):740-745.
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.2.740-745.1999
Radler F, Brohl K. The metabolism of several carboxylic acids by lactic acid bacteria. Z Natur forsch C J Biosci. 1984; 179(3): 228-231.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01041899
Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certific-ation. GOST 31494-2012 Kvases. General Specifications. Moscow: Standard inform; 2013: 2-4
Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certific-ation. GOST 6687.7-88 Soft drinks and kvasses. method of alcohol determination. Moscow: Standard-inform;1989: 2-6
Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certific-ation. GOST 6687.4-86 Non-alcoholic drinks, kvasses and syrups. Method of acidity determination. Moscow: Standard-inform;1987: 2-3
Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certific-ation. GOST 6687.5-86 Non-alcoholic industry products. methods for determination of organoleptic indices and products volume. Moscow: Standardinform;1987: 2-7
Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certific-ation. GOST 32771-2014. Juice products. Determination of organic acids by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography. Moscow: Standardinform; 2014. 2-13
Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certific-ation. GOST 33408-2015. Cognac, Cognac Distillate, Brandy. Determination of aldehydes, esters and alcohols by gas chromatography. Moscow: Standard inform; 2016; 2-16
Interstate Council for Standardization, Metrology and Certific-ation. GOST 30712-2001 Products of non-alcoholic industry. methods of microbiological analysis. Moscow: Standard inform; 2010; 2-10
Alekseeva M, Fedorov A, Smotraeva I, Balanov P, Uspenskaia T. Biotechnological and raw material aspects in the production of probiotic drink from wheat. 19th Int Multidisc Sci Geo Conf SGEM. 2019; 19(6): 603-610.
Louis P, Hold G, Flint H. The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2014; 12(10): 661-672.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01041899
Annan N, Poll L, Sefa-Dedeh S, Plahar W, Jakobsen M. Volatile compounds produced by Lactobacillus fermentum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida krusei in single starter culture fermentations of ghanaian Maize Dough. J Appl Microbyol. 2003; 94(3):462-474.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01852.x
Zaunmuller T, Eichert M, Richter H, Unden G. Variations in the energy metabolism of biotechnologically relevant heteroferme-ntative lactic acid bacteria during growth on sugars and organic acids. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006; 7; 72(3): 421-429.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0514-3
Kobelev V. Research on the comparative characteristics of kvass. Beer Drink. 2008; (2): 38-41.
https://doi.org/10.24411/2072-9650-2018-00003
Shin KS, Lee JH. Acetaldehyde contents and quality character-istics of commercial alcoholic beverages. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2019 (28): 1027-1036.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00564-1
Jeong HS, Chung H, Song SH, Kim CI, Lee JG, Kim YS. Validation and determination of the contents of acetaldehyde and formaldehyde in foods. Toxicol Res. 2015 (31): 273-278.
https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2015.31.3.273
Cebeci A, Gurakan C. Properties of potential probiotic Lacto-bacillus plantarum strains. Food Microbiol. 2003; 20(5): 511-518.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-0020(02)00174-0
Seddik A, Bendali F, Gancel F, Fliss I, Spano G, Drider D. Lactobacillus plantarum and Its probiotic and food potent-ialities. Probiotics Antimicro. 2017; 9(2): 111-122.
- Abstract Viewed: 207 times
- pdf Downloaded: 238 times