Pharmaceutical Science Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login
International Pharmacy Acta
  • Home
  • Journal Info
    • About the Journal
    • Publisher
    • Aim and Scope
    • Ownership & Management
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Journal History
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • For Authors
    • Author Guidelines
    • Types of articles
    • Templates
    • Publication Fees
    • Peer Review Process
  • For Reviewers
    • Reviewers' Guidelines
    • Responcibility for Reviewres
  • Publication Ethics
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Code of Publishing Ethics
  • Policies and Process
    • Allegations of Misconduct
    • Article Processing Charge (APC)
    • Advertisement and Marketing
    • Archiving
    • Article Withdrawal & Retraction Policy
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Copyright Notice
    • Complaints Policy
    • Editorial Policies
    • Open Access Policy
    • Peer-Review Policy
    • Post- Publication Discussions and Corrections Policy
    • Principles of Transparency
    • Publication Policy
    • Repository
    • Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) Plicies
  • New Submission
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): Pharmacy Updates 2018 (Congress Proceeding)
  4. Supplementary Issues: Reviews of books, journal, congress, other media Special issues, and Scientific news

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018)

March 2018

A comparative study of pharmaceutical institutions in Iran and abroad

  • Yasaman Cheraghi
  • Azar Bagheri Alamooti
  • Nazanin Sabet Eghlidi
  • Mina Shahisavandi
  • Seyed Mehrdad Mostafavipoor
  • Hossein Niknahad

International Pharmacy Acta, Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018), 4 March 2018 , Page 64-65
https://doi.org/10.22037/ipa.v1i1.20018 Published: 2018-03-04

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction: In different countries, various organizations and associations are active in the field of pharmacy. These activities mainly consist of policy-making, implementation, training and supervision. In Iran, different tasks are concentrated in one or two institutions; and the active presence of the private sector is not tangible. On the other hand, in developed countries, tasks are divided between public and private institutions. In this article, by investigating and comparing these institutions in different countries and drawing conclusions, systems for dividing tasks with greater efficiency will be achieved.

Methods and Results: The workgroup on "Investigating Pharmaceutical Institutions" of Pharmaceutical-Strategic-Studies-Office conducted a study on the responsibilities of each of these institutions, their target population, efficiency rate on the defined objectives in policy, implementation, monitoring and education areas in Iran, neighboring countries and developed countries, as well as their different and similar duties with each other. In this review article, several searches have been done in databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, specialized books as well as websites related to each of these institutions.

The results show that in developed countries an average of six pharmaceutical associations exist, all of which are active in the field of education. In the United States, an organization that approves the competency of pharmacists and issues pharmacy establishment permits has been separated from overseeing organizations. In Japan, other than the Health Ministry as a policy-maker and a special council for legislative purposes, a formal overseeing institution, an Office of Health Assessment and two associations with a scientific-trade and research approach are active. In Australia, one third of the associations are active in the area of law enforcement; and the organization which is active in the field of policy-making and supervision does not have any executive activities. In the European Union, one institution has a role in the field of macro policy-making and two associations are involved in micro policy-making. In India and Pakistan, practically all affairs are carried out in the governmental format; NGOs operate in the field of education, research and government consultation. Overall, China is the most similar to Iran.

Keywords:
  • Pharmacy
  • PDF

How to Cite

Cheraghi, Y., Bagheri Alamooti, A., Sabet Eghlidi, N., Shahisavandi, M., Mostafavipoor, S. M., & Niknahad, H. (2018). A comparative study of pharmaceutical institutions in Iran and abroad. International Pharmacy Acta, 1(1), 64–65. https://doi.org/10.22037/ipa.v1i1.20018
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 410 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 243 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Make a Submission

Make a Submission
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Creative Commons License
This journal (and its contents) is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

                                                  Online ISSN: 2645-3266

                                                  Print ISSN: 2645-3258                                                 

Powered by OJSPlus