Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
International Pharmacy Acta
Journal Profile and Governance
Abbreviated Title: Int Pharm Acta
Print ISSN: 2645-3258
Online ISSN: 2645-3266
Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Farshad Hosseini Shirazi
Publisher: Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Editorial Management: Dr. Behzad Pourhossein (Journal Manager and English Editor)
Editorial Principles and Operational Standards
International Pharmacy Acta adheres strictly to the Core Practices and operational flowcharts established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The journal also operates in full conformity with the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals issued by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). The editorial decisions of the journal are conducted with complete editorial independence from the Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center and Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Editorial determinations are governed solely by scientific merit, experimental integrity, methodological rigor, clarity of exposition, and clinical or pharmaceutical relevance, without external commercial, institutional, or personal interference.
Peer-Review Architecture
All original manuscripts, short communications, reviews, and clinical evaluations submitted to the journal undergo an initial internal quality screening by the editorial office under the direction of the Editor-in-Chief to confirm manuscript scope, procedural completeness, format adherence, and primary ethical clearance. Manuscripts clearing this screening undergo rigorous double-blind peer review. The identities of authors and reviewers remain strictly concealed from one another throughout the evaluation process.
A minimum of three independent, external expert reviewers evaluate each manuscript sent for formal peer assessment. Peer reviewers are mandated to maintain absolute confidentiality regarding all materials entrusted to them, recuse themselves immediately if any financial, competitive, or institutional conflict of interest exists, and decline review invitations when timely evaluation cannot be guaranteed. Reviewers are forbidden from transferring, circulating, retaining, or adopting any unpublished data or concepts contained in the submitted texts. Final editorial authority on acceptance, revision, or rejection rests entirely with the Editor-in-Chief.
Authorship Standards and Author Changes
Authorship credit must conform strictly to the four criteria outlined by the ICMJE:
Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the study, or to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data.Drafting the intellectual work or revising it critically for pivotal conceptual content.Final formal approval of the version to be published.Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that queries relating to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the project are investigated and resolved.All contributors who do not satisfy all four authorship requirements should be recognized explicitly in the Acknowledgments section with their written permission.
In strict alignment with COPE guidelines on authorship disputes, any request for alterations to the author line-up (including addition, deletion, or re-ordering of author names) after submission must be accompanied by a formal written explanation from the corresponding author, along with signed documentation from every author (including the individual being added or removed) signifying unanimous agreement. Changes to the authorship list following official acceptance of the manuscript are categorically prohibited, except under substantiated, extraordinary circumstances evaluated directly by the Editor-in-Chief and verified by the authors’ host institutions.
Ethical Approval and Research Governance
Studies involving human subjects or tissues must comply with the ethical standards of the Declaratio
n of Helsinki. All research protocols involving human participants, patient data, clinical intervention trials, or animal experimentation submitted from Iranian institutions must obtain approval from a recognized Institutional Review Board registered within the National Committee for Ethics in Biomedical Research (Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education), and the official Ethics Committee Approval Code must be declared in the Materials and Methods section. Clinical interventional trials must be prospectively registered in a public clinical trial registry, such as the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) or equivalent WHO primary registries, with the valid trial identification number cited within the manuscript abstract and methodology. Studies involving animal subjects must document institutional animal care and use committee approval, verifying compliance with the ARRIVE reporting parameters and humane handling regulations.
Informed Consent and Subject Confidentiality
Authors must protect patient privacy and confidentiality. Informed written consent must be obtained from all human participants or their legally authorized representatives for participation and for the publication of any potentially identifiable personal, diagnostic, or photographic data. The consent to participate in a clinical study cannot be substituted for consent to publish identifiable case material. Identifying clinical descriptions, initials, or facial imagery must be omitted unless indispensable for scientific validity, in which case formal, explicit written patient consent must be documented.
Data Authenticity and Image Presentation
The manufacturing of fabricated data, fraudulent manipulation, selective omission of conflicting data, and inappropriate digital alteration of experimental images (such as electrophoretic gels, Western blots, and histology micrographs) constitute egregious research misconduct. Any graphical adjustment involving brightness, balance, or contrast must apply uniformly across the entire digital frame, must not distort, obscure, or delete specific visual information, and must be stated transparently in the figure legends. The journal reserves the right to demand raw, unprocessed instrument data, original laboratory records, and uncropped image files during review or subsequent inquiry.
Plagiarism and Redundant Publication
The journal applies systematic digital screening using iThenticate and validated text-matching software to identify textual overlap across all submissions upon initial intake and prior to formal publication. The journal operates a zero-tolerance framework toward textual plagiarism, patchwriting, redundant duplication, duplicate publication, uncredited intellectual property appropriation, and salami slicing (the fragmented publication of an interrelated experimental dataset). If substantial overlap or duplicate submission is uncovered, the manuscript will be rejected summarily, and notification will be sent to the authors’ affiliated institutions and relevant regulatory bodies following COPE procedural flowcharts.
Conflicts of Interest and Transparency
Authors, reviewers, and editors are required to disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest that could influence, or be perceived to influence, the reporting or appraisal of the scientific work. Authors must complete and sign standard ICMJE disclosure statements at submission. Financial sponsorships, corporate consulting engagements, honoraria, institutional support, commercial patent filings, and relevant corporate ties must be fully disclosed within the manuscript. In manuscripts authored by members of the editorial board, handling of the submission is transferred entirely to an independent guest editor, and the authoring editor is completely excluded from the review stream and editorial decision-making.
Article Processing Charges and Fee Waivers
Publishing operations for International Pharmacy Acta are supported by the Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. The jour
nal does not impose any Article Processing Charges (APCs), submission fees, or publication surcharges on authors. All submissions are processed and published free of charge. Editorial evaluations are conducted solely on academic merit, independently of any economic considerations.
Corrections, Retractions, and Post-Publication Inquiries
The journal maintains a permanent, accountable academic archive. Legitimate critiques and notifications of technical error from the scientific community are reviewed objectively. Substantive post-publication errors that do not compromise the essential validity of the study are remediated promptly through formal, citable Errata or Corrigenda. In cases of unverified findings under active investigation, an Editorial Expression of Concern will be issued.
If conclusive evidence reveals pervasive scientific falsification, duplicate publication, plagiarism, or profound ethical misconduct, the publication will be retracted in strict conformity with the COPE Retraction Guidelines. Formal retraction notices will cite the specific basis for the withdrawal, will identify the originating author or editorial board decision, and will remain permanently linked to the electronic version of the published manuscript, which will be watermarked clearly as retracted to maintain transparency in the historical literature.
Appeals and Editorial Complaints
Authors wishing to appeal an editorial rejection must transmit a formal, point-by-point rebuttal to the Editor-in-Chief detailing concrete scientific, empirical, or methodological justifications countering the critical comments, without unsubstantiated grievances. The Editor-in-Chief assesses the appeal internally and may assign the file to an independent arbiter from the editorial council. Complaints regarding procedural unfairness, peer-review handling, or editorial bias are investigated internally by the editorial leadership, with recourse to external consultation conforming to COPE protocols if the grievance cannot be resolved amicably within the journal’s governance framework.