Publisher: School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Register
  • Login

Archives of Advances in Biosciences

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Current
    • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Privacy Statement
    • Financial Policies
    • Indexing/Abstracting
    • Contact
  • For Authors
    • Submissions
    • Author Guidelines
    • Ethical Guidelines
    • Code of Publishing Ethics
    • Allegations of misconduct
    • Principles of Transparency
    • Editorial Policies
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Copyright
    • Article withdrawal
    • Complaints process
    • FAQ
  • For Reviewers
    • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Policies of Peer Review
  • Announcements
  • Manuscript Template
    • Original Article
    • Review Article
    • Case Reports
    • Short Communication
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 7 No. 1 (2016): Winter
  4. Research/Original Articles

Winter
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2016)

Comparison of generalized estimating equations (GEE), mixed effects models (MEM) and repeated measures ANOVA in analysis of menorrhagia data

  • Parisa Naseri
  • Hamid Alavi Majd
  • Nourossadat Kariman
  • Atefeh Sourtiji

Archives of Advances in Biosciences, Vol. 7 No. 1 (2016), , Page 32-40
https://doi.org/10.22037/jps.v7i1.11250 Published 25 January 2016

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

     Menorrhagia is one of the most common gynecological problem and leading causes of poor quality of life and iron deficiency anemia in women of reproductive age. Research in gynecological field relies heavily on repeated measure designs. Repeated measure studies are helpful in understanding how factors of interest change over time. Our goal is to apply statistical methods which are appropriate for analyzing repeated measure data such as gynecological data. Three statistical methods were performed by data collection from 100 patients with menorrhagia. One-hundred patients were randomly assigned to two groups, i.e. intervention group (Urtica Dioica and mefenamic acid) and control group (placebo and mefenamic acid) with an equal size of 50. In this study, generalized estimating equations (GEE) and mixed effects models (MEM) were used for analyzing menorrhagia data to determine the effect of hydroalcoholic extract of Urtica Dioica on Menorrhagia. Finally, these methods are compared to the conventional repeated measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA).

Based on the results, the three methods are found to be similar in terms of statistical estimation, the amount of bleeding before and after treatment between and within groups was compared. Results showed the average amount of bleeding was reduced significantly (P˂0/001). The average menorrhagia score in the third month (second cycles after intervention) were 91.38(71.432) and 149.40(127.823) in Urtica Dioica and control groups, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p =0.036). Because their advantages, GEE and MEM should be strongly considered for the analysis of repeated measure data. In particular, GEE should be utilized to explore overall average effects. When in addition to overall average effects, subject-specific effects are of primary interest, MEM should be utilized. With respect to these methods, it seems the extract of Urtica Dioica can be effective in reducing the amount of menstrual bleeding in women of reproductive age with Menorrhagia.

 

Keywords:
  • Repeated Measure-ANOVA
  • Generalized Estimating Equations
  • Mixed Effects Models
  • Repeated measure study
  • Menorrhagia
  • PDF

How to Cite

Naseri, P., Alavi Majd, H., Kariman, N., & Sourtiji, A. (2016). Comparison of generalized estimating equations (GEE), mixed effects models (MEM) and repeated measures ANOVA in analysis of menorrhagia data. Archives of Advances in Biosciences, 7(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.22037/jps.v7i1.11250
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 2377 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 4716 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram
Open Journal Systems
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Address: P.O. Box: 19395-4618, Darband St., Qods Sq.,Tehran, Iran.

Tel: +98-21-22707346

eISSN: 2783-1264

 Archives of Advances in Biosciences is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International License.( CC BY-NC 4.0)

 

The template of this website is designed by Sinaweb